Literature DB >> 28215592

Association between delay to coronary reperfusion and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Norihiro Kuroki1, Daisuke Abe2, Toru Iwama1, Kou Suzuki1, Kazuhiro Sugiyama3, Akiko Akashi3, Yuichi Hamabe3, Kazutaka Aonuma4, Akira Sato4.   

Abstract

AIM: The prognostic effect of early coronary reperfusion therapy with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with cardiac arrest due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has yet to be clarified. We investigated the relationship between time interval from collapse to start of ECPR (CtoE) and coronary reperfusion (CtoR) time and neurological outcome in patients with cardiac arrest due to ACS.
METHODS: A cohort of 119 consecutive patients (63±12 years old) with ACS who underwent ECPR and percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) at our hospital was registered from January 2005 to June 2016. We analyzed patient clinical outcome, which was defined as survival with good neurological outcome at 30 days. We divided the patients into four groups according to CtoR time: Group 1 (time<60min: n=19), Group 2 (60≤time<90min: n=19), Group 3 (time≥90min: n=70) and Group 4 (unsuccessful coronary reperfusion: n=11).
RESULTS: One hundred patients (84%) were successful of PCI. A Kaplan-Meier curve showed that Group 1 had the best outcome among the four groups (good neurological outcome at 30 days; 74% vs 37% vs 23% vs 9%, P<0.0001). In receiver operating characteristics analysis for good neurological outcome at 30 days, the cutoff values for CtoE was 40min. The delay CtoE and CtoR time were independent predictors of poor neurological outcome at 30 days after adjusting multiple confounders (CtoE time; Hazard ratio (HR):1.026, 95% confidential intervals(CI): 1.011-1.042, P=0.001), (CtoR time; HR: 1.004, 95% CI: 1.001-1.008, P=0.020).
CONCLUSIONS: A shorter CtoE and CtoR predicts better clinical outcome in patients with ACS undergoing ECPR.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28215592     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  12 in total

1.  What is extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Authors:  Federico Pappalardo; Andrea Montisci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC.

Authors:  Guido Michels; Tobias Wengenmayer; Christian Hagl; Christian Dohmen; Bernd W Böttiger; Johann Bauersachs; Andreas Markewitz; Adrian Bauer; Jan-Thorsten Gräsner; Roman Pfister; Alexander Ghanem; Hans-Jörg Busch; Uwe Kreimeier; Andreas Beckmann; Matthias Fischer; Clemens Kill; Uwe Janssens; Stefan Kluge; Frank Born; Hans Martin Hoffmeister; Michael Preusch; Udo Boeken; Reimer Riessen; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  [Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC].

Authors:  G Michels; T Wengenmayer; C Hagl; C Dohmen; B W Böttiger; J Bauersachs; A Markewitz; A Bauer; J-T Gräsner; R Pfister; A Ghanem; H-J Busch; U Kreimeier; A Beckmann; M Fischer; C Kill; U Janssens; S Kluge; F Born; H M Hoffmeister; M Preusch; U Boeken; R Riessen; H Thiele
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 4.  [Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC].

Authors:  G Michels; T Wengenmayer; C Hagl; C Dohmen; B W Böttiger; J Bauersachs; A Markewitz; A Bauer; J-T Gräsner; R Pfister; A Ghanem; H-J Busch; U Kreimeier; A Beckmann; M Fischer; C Kill; U Janssens; S Kluge; F Born; H M Hoffmeister; M Preusch; U Boeken; R Riessen; H Thiele
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective propensity score matched study.

Authors:  Daniel Patricio; Lorenzo Peluso; Alexandre Brasseur; Olivier Lheureux; Mirko Belliato; Jean-Louis Vincent; Jacques Creteur; Fabio Silvio Taccone
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults with shock-refractory cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Dennis Miraglia; Jonathan E Ayala
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-01-18

7.  A retrospective analysis of inpatient cardiac arrests over one year at a tertiary heart attack and cardiothoracic centre identifying potential candidates for an inpatient extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation service.

Authors:  Suzanne Harrogate; Benjamin Stretch; Rosie Seatter; Simon Finney; Ben Singer
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2019-05-09

Review 8.  A systematic review of current ECPR protocols. A step towards standardisation.

Authors:  't Joncke Koen; Thelinge Nathanaël; Dewolf Philippe
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-07-19

Review 9.  Pre-hospital extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Ben Singer; Joshua C Reynolds; David J Lockey; Ben O'Brien
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Akihiko Inoue; Toru Hifumi; Tetsuya Sakamoto; Yasuhiro Kuroda
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.