Literature DB >> 28215374

Collaboration With Deaf Communities to Conduct Accessible Health Surveillance.

Steven L Barnett1, Kelly A Matthews2, Erika J Sutter2, Lori A DeWindt2, Jacqueline A Pransky2, Amanda M O'Hearn2, Tamala M David2, Robert Q Pollard3, Vincent J Samar3, Thomas A Pearson4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Populations of deaf sign language users experience health disparities unmeasured by current public health surveillance. Population-specific health data are necessary to collaboratively identify health priorities and evaluate interventions. Standardized, reproducible, and language-concordant data collection in sign language is impossible via written or telephone surveys.
METHODS: Deaf and hearing researchers, community members, and other stakeholders developed a broad computer-based health survey based on the telephone-administered Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. They translated survey items from English to sign language, evaluated the translations, and filmed the survey items for inclusion in their custom software. They initiated the second Rochester Deaf Health Survey in 2013 (n=211). Analyses (conducted in 2015) compared Rochester Deaf Health Survey 2013 findings with those of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System with the general adult population in the same community (2012, n=1,816).
RESULTS: The Rochester Deaf Health Survey 2013 participants' mean age was 44.7 (range, 18-87) years. Most were deaf since birth or early childhood (87.1%) and highly educated (53.6% with ≥4 years of college). The median household income was <$35,000. The prevalence of current smokers was low (8.1%). Nearly all (93.8%) reported having health insurance, yet barriers to appropriate health care were evident, with high emergency department use (16.2% with two or more past-year visits) and 22.7% forgoing needed health care in the past year because of cost.
CONCLUSIONS: Community-engaged research with deaf populations identifies strengths and priorities, providing essential information otherwise missing from existing public health surveillance, and forming a foundation for collaborative dissemination to facilitate broader inclusion of deaf communities.
Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28215374     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  6 in total

1.  Promoting health equity for deaf patients through the electronic health record.

Authors:  Tyler G James; Meagan K Sullivan; Joshua D Butler; Michael M McKee
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Emergency department utilization among deaf and hard-of-hearing patients: A retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Tyler G James; Michael M McKee; M David Miller; Meagan K Sullivan; Kyle A Coady; Julia R Varnes; Thomas A Pearson; Ali M Yurasek; JeeWon Cheong
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Deaf patient-provider communication and lung cancer screening: Health Information National Trends survey in American Sign Language (HINTS-ASL).

Authors:  P Kushalnagar; Alina Engelman; G Sadler
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-03-05

4.  Community-Engaged Needs Assessment of Deaf American Sign Language Users in Florida, 2018.

Authors:  Tyler G James; Michael M McKee; Meagan K Sullivan; Glenna Ashton; Stephen J Hardy; Yary Santiago; David G Phillips; JeeWon Cheong
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Considering parental hearing status as a social determinant of deaf population health: Insights from experiences of the "dinner table syndrome".

Authors:  Wyatte C Hall; Scott R Smith; Erika J Sutter; Lori A DeWindt; Timothy D V Dye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Conceptual Model of Emergency Department Utilization among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Patients: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Tyler G James; Julia R Varnes; Meagan K Sullivan; JeeWon Cheong; Thomas A Pearson; Ali M Yurasek; M David Miller; Michael M McKee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.