Maria Rita Migliorino1, Antonio Santo2, Giampiero Romano3, Diego Cortinovis4, Domenico Galetta5, Oscar Alabiso6, Giacomo Cartenì7, Sabrina Vari8, Gianpiero Fasola9, Antonio Pazzola10, Dario Giuffrida11, Alberto Zaniboni12, Alberto Caprioli13, Flavia Longo14, Valentina Acciai15, Filippo de Marinis16. 1. A.O. San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy. ritamigliorino@tiscali.it. 2. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy. 3. Ospedale V. Fazzi, Lecce, Italy. 4. Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy. 5. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" I.R.C.C.S., Bari, Italy. 6. A.O.U. Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy. 7. A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy. 8. Istituto Regina Elena, Rome, Italy. 9. A.O.U. Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy. 10. Ospedale Civile SS. Annunziata, Sassari, Italy. 11. Istituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy. 12. Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy. 13. A.O. Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy. 14. Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy. 15. Boehringer Ingelheim Italia Spa, Milan, Italy. 16. Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a condition with significant clinical burden for patients and relevant economic impact. Limited evidence exists on the management costs of NSCLC patients, especially in the late phases of the disease. The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate the economic impact of clinical management of NSCLC patients in the Italian population. METHODS: This evaluation was an economic analysis of the observational and multicentre study LIFE, which described the therapeutic approach in routine clinical practice for NSCLC patients, progressing after first-line treatment. This study evaluated resource consumption in different Italian hospitals, including specialist visits, hospitalizations, accesses to first aid, pharmacological treatment, laboratory tests and palliative care. The National Healthcare Service perspective was adopted. RESULTS: In this study, N = 191 patients enrolled in the LIFE study were included. Patients were aged 64.2 years and were predominantly males (66%). In the different line of treatments, monthly costs of patients ranged between €1471 (first line) and €1788 (third line). The overall healthcare cost over the average period of observation (16.4 months) was €25,859 per patient. Overall, oncology therapy was the cost driver, although the composition of medical costs changed across the different lines of treatment, with costs for concomitant medication and palliative care being predominant in late phase of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of NSCLC is extremely high during the overall period of treatment, and a significant level of care is required in each stage of the disease.
PURPOSE:Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a condition with significant clinical burden for patients and relevant economic impact. Limited evidence exists on the management costs of NSCLCpatients, especially in the late phases of the disease. The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate the economic impact of clinical management of NSCLCpatients in the Italian population. METHODS: This evaluation was an economic analysis of the observational and multicentre study LIFE, which described the therapeutic approach in routine clinical practice for NSCLCpatients, progressing after first-line treatment. This study evaluated resource consumption in different Italian hospitals, including specialist visits, hospitalizations, accesses to first aid, pharmacological treatment, laboratory tests and palliative care. The National Healthcare Service perspective was adopted. RESULTS: In this study, N = 191 patients enrolled in the LIFE study were included. Patients were aged 64.2 years and were predominantly males (66%). In the different line of treatments, monthly costs of patients ranged between €1471 (first line) and €1788 (third line). The overall healthcare cost over the average period of observation (16.4 months) was €25,859 per patient. Overall, oncology therapy was the cost driver, although the composition of medical costs changed across the different lines of treatment, with costs for concomitant medication and palliative care being predominant in late phase of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of NSCLC is extremely high during the overall period of treatment, and a significant level of care is required in each stage of the disease.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cost per line of treatment; Economic burden; Line of treatment; Non-small cell lung cancer; Observational study
Authors: Dae Ho Lee; Keunchil Park; Joo Hang Kim; Jong-Seok Lee; Sang Won Shin; Jin-Hyoung Kang; Myung-Ju Ahn; Jin Seok Ahn; Cheolwon Suh; Sang-We Kim Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Cesare Gridelli; Filippo de Marinis; Andrea Ardizzoni; Silvia Novello; Gabriella Fontanini; Federico Cappuzzo; Francesco Grossi; Antonio Santo; Diego Cortinovis; Adolfo Favaretto; Vito Lorusso; Domenico Galetta; Salvatore Siena; Anna Bettini; Monica Iurlaro; Alberto Caprioli Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: J Ferlay; E Steliarova-Foucher; J Lortet-Tieulent; S Rosso; J W W Coebergh; H Comber; D Forman; F Bray Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Joan L Warren; K Robin Yabroff; Angela Meekins; Marie Topor; Elizabeth B Lamont; Martin L Brown Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-06-10 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Kenneth O'Byrne; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Sergey Orlov; Chun-Ming Tsai; Michael Boyer; Wu-Chou Su; Jaafar Bennouna; Terufumi Kato; Vera Gorbunova; Ki Hyeong Lee; Riyaz Shah; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Mehdi Shahidi; Martin Schuler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ulrich Gatzemeier; Anna Pluzanska; Aleksandra Szczesna; Eckhard Kaukel; Jaromir Roubec; Flavio De Rosa; Janusz Milanowski; Hanna Karnicka-Mlodkowski; Milos Pesek; Piotr Serwatowski; Rodryg Ramlau; Terezie Janaskova; Johan Vansteenkiste; Janos Strausz; Georgy Moiseevich Manikhas; Joachim Von Pawel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ruxu You; Jinyu Liu; David Bin-Chia Wu; XinYu Qian; Boxiang Lyu; Yu Zhang; Nan Luo Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 3.989