Roman Shrestha1, Pramila Karki2, Frederick L Altice3, Tania B Huedo-Medina2, Jaimie P Meyer4, Lynn Madden5, Michael Copenhaver2. 1. Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA; Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. Electronic address: Roman.Shrestha@UConn.edu. 2. Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. 3. Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, AIDS Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, AIDS Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 5. APT Foundation, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although people who use drugs (PWUD) are key populations recommended to receive pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV, few data are available to guide PrEP delivery in this underserved group. We therefore examined the willingness to initiate PrEP and the anticipation of HIV risk reduction while on PrEP among high-risk PWUD. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of 400 HIV-negative, opioid dependent persons enrolled in a methadone program and reporting recent risk behaviors, we examined independent correlates of being willing to initiate PrEP. RESULTS: While only 72 (18%) were aware of PrEP, after being given a description of it, 251 (62.7%) were willing to initiate PrEP. This outcome was associated with having neurocognitive impairment (aOR=3.184, p=0.004) and higher perceived HIV risk (aOR=8.044, p<0.001). Among those willing to initiate PrEP, only 12.5% and 28.2%, respectively, indicated that they would always use condoms and not share injection equipment while on PrEP. Consistent condom use was associated with higher income (aOR=8.315, p=0.016), always using condoms with casual partners (aOR=6.597, p=0.001), and inversely associated with ongoing drug injection (aOR=0.323, p=0.027). Consistent safe injection, however, was inversely associated with age (aOR=0.948, p=0.035), ongoing drug injection (aOR=0.342, p<0.001), and perceived HIV risk (aOR=0.191, p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: While willingness to initiate PrEP was high and correlated with being at elevated risk for HIV, anticipated higher risk behaviors in this group even while on PrEP suggests that the next generation of HIV prevention approaches may need to combine biomedical and behavioral components to sustain HIV risk reduction over time.
BACKGROUND: Although people who use drugs (PWUD) are key populations recommended to receive pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV, few data are available to guide PrEP delivery in this underserved group. We therefore examined the willingness to initiate PrEP and the anticipation of HIV risk reduction while on PrEP among high-risk PWUD. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of 400 HIV-negative, opioid dependent persons enrolled in a methadone program and reporting recent risk behaviors, we examined independent correlates of being willing to initiate PrEP. RESULTS: While only 72 (18%) were aware of PrEP, after being given a description of it, 251 (62.7%) were willing to initiate PrEP. This outcome was associated with having neurocognitive impairment (aOR=3.184, p=0.004) and higher perceived HIV risk (aOR=8.044, p<0.001). Among those willing to initiate PrEP, only 12.5% and 28.2%, respectively, indicated that they would always use condoms and not share injection equipment while on PrEP. Consistent condom use was associated with higher income (aOR=8.315, p=0.016), always using condoms with casual partners (aOR=6.597, p=0.001), and inversely associated with ongoing drug injection (aOR=0.323, p=0.027). Consistent safe injection, however, was inversely associated with age (aOR=0.948, p=0.035), ongoing drug injection (aOR=0.342, p<0.001), and perceived HIV risk (aOR=0.191, p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: While willingness to initiate PrEP was high and correlated with being at elevated risk for HIV, anticipated higher risk behaviors in this group even while on PrEP suggests that the next generation of HIV prevention approaches may need to combine biomedical and behavioral components to sustain HIV risk reduction over time.
Authors: Brenda Hoagland; Raquel B De Boni; Ronaldo I Moreira; José Valdez Madruga; Esper G Kallas; Silvia Pereira Goulart; Natalia Cerqueira; Thiago S Torres; Paula M Luz; Nilo Martinez Fernandes; Albert Y Liu; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Valdilea G Veloso Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-05
Authors: Michael C Thigpen; Poloko M Kebaabetswe; Lynn A Paxton; Dawn K Smith; Charles E Rose; Tebogo M Segolodi; Faith L Henderson; Sonal R Pathak; Fatma A Soud; Kata L Chillag; Rodreck Mutanhaurwa; Lovemore Ian Chirwa; Michael Kasonde; Daniel Abebe; Evans Buliva; Roman J Gvetadze; Sandra Johnson; Thom Sukalac; Vasavi T Thomas; Clyde Hart; Jeffrey A Johnson; C Kevin Malotte; Craig W Hendrix; John T Brooks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Leonieke C van Boekel; Evelien P M Brouwers; Jaap van Weeghel; Henk F L Garretsen Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ana Wheelock; Andreas B Eisingerich; Jintanat Ananworanich; Gabriela B Gomez; Timothy B Hallett; Mark R Dybul; Peter Piot Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sheena McCormack; David T Dunn; Monica Desai; David I Dolling; Mitzy Gafos; Richard Gilson; Ann K Sullivan; Amanda Clarke; Iain Reeves; Gabriel Schembri; Nicola Mackie; Christine Bowman; Charles J Lacey; Vanessa Apea; Michael Brady; Julie Fox; Stephen Taylor; Simone Antonucci; Saye H Khoo; James Rooney; Anthony Nardone; Martin Fisher; Alan McOwan; Andrew N Phillips; Anne M Johnson; Brian Gazzard; Owen N Gill Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Roman Shrestha; Frederick L Altice; Brian Sibilio; Jude Ssenyonjo; Michael M Copenhaver Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Roman Shrestha; Pramila Karki; Frederick L Altice; Oleksandr Dubov; Liana Fraenkel; Tania Huedo-Medina; Michael Copenhaver Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2018-04
Authors: Roman Shrestha; Pramila Karki; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Michael Copenhaver Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Susan G Sherman; Kristin E Schneider; Ju Nyeong Park; Sean T Allen; Derrick Hunt; C Patrick Chaulk; Brian W Weir Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jennifer L Glick; Rienna Russo; Belinda Jivapong; Lori Rosman; Danielle Pelaez; Katherine H A Footer; Susan G Sherman Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-05
Authors: Suzan M Walters; Bethany Coston; Alan Neaigus; Alexis V Rivera; Lila Starbuck; Valentina Ramirez; Kathleen H Reilly; Sarah L Braunstein Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2020-02-21