Literature DB >> 28213133

The relation between ECAP measurements and the effect of rate on behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Colette M McKay1, Nicholas Smale2.   

Abstract

It has been shown that electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds are not sufficiently predictive of behavioral thresholds to allow their use as a totally objective method to program a cochlear implant. Previous animal studies have shown that two other ECAP parameters (the ECAP amplitude growth slope and the effect on ECAPs of changing the phase duration (PD) or interphase gap (IPG)), and the way that behavioral thresholds change with increasing rate of stimulation, are associated with cochlear health. This experiment tested the hypotheses that a) the degree to which behavioral thresholds change with rate of stimulation is associated with either or both of those two ECAP parameters, and that b) the accuracy of ECAP thresholds for predicting behavioral thresholds at clinically relevant rates can be increased by including those additional ECAP parameters. Both these hypotheses were confirmed by the data. The ECAP slope was associated with within-subject variation across electrode positions of both behavioral thresholds and the change of thresholds with increasing rate. The effect of changes in IPG or PD on ECAPs was moderately associated with between-subjects variations in both average absolute behavioral thresholds and the average effect of rate on thresholds. The inclusion of the IPG/PD effect to predict average absolute behavioral thresholds for each subject and inclusion of the ECAP growth slope to predict variation in relative thresholds across electrode positions in the same subject led to a significant increase in accuracy of the predicted behavioral thresholds.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Electrically evoked compound action potential; Rate of stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28213133     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A Fast Approximate Method for Predicting the Behavior of Auditory Nerve Fibers and the Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Signal.

Authors:  Azam Ghanaei; S Mohammad P Firoozabadi; Hamed Sadjedi
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2021-07-21

3.  The Effect of Increasing Interphase Gap on N1 Latency of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and the Stimulation Level Offset in Human Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Measurements of the local evoked potential from the cochlear nucleus in patients with an auditory brainstem implant and its implication to auditory perception and audio processor programming.

Authors:  Lutz Gärtner; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Relationship between Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds and Auditory, Language, and Speech Progress after Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy; Navid Nourizadeh; Farzad Mobedshahi; Sadegh Jafarzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07

6.  Evaluating and Comparing Behavioural and Electrophysiological Estimates of Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Charlotte Garcia; Manohar Bance; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-04

7.  Interpreting the Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and on Neural Health Estimates.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; Colette M McKay; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.