Literature DB >> 2821280

Mathematical modeling of the effects of the signal recognition particle on translation and translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

T A Rapoport1, R Heinrich, P Walter, T Schulmeister.   

Abstract

The kinetics of the signal recognition particle(SRP)-mediated process of protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane was studied by mathematical modeling and complementary experiments. The following results were obtained. (1) A model according to which SRP directs the ribosome, rather than the mRNA, to the membrane is supported by experiments designed to discriminate between the two alternatives. (2) This model describes both steady-state and synchronized translation experiments and makes a number of predictions. (3) The interaction between a nascent protein and SRP may be described by two parameters: (i) a binding constant which can be attributed to the structure of the signal peptide, and (ii) the size of the "SRP-window", i.e. the distance between the first and the last site on the polypeptide chain that can interact with SRP. For preprolactin a binding constant of 1 to 2.5 nmol-1l was estimated. Modeling of the synchronized synthesis of ovalbumin indicates that it has a much weaker binding constant than preprolactin (approximately 0.25 nmol-1l) although we cannot exclude the possibility that the SRP-window may be also smaller. (4) A better understanding of the molecular effects of SRP on translation and translocation through the rough endoplasmic reticulum membrane has been achieved. Inhibition of the steady-state rate of translation by SRP requires a stoichiometric interaction of SRP with ribosomes carrying nascent polypeptide chains and will occur only when ribosomes are piled up back to the initiation site. Translocation, on the other hand, requires only the catalytic action of SRP and is determined by the local concentration of protein-synthesizing ribosomes accumulated at the site(s) of SRP interaction. As a consequence, translational inhibition by SRP may sometimes fail to occur, depending either on the type of protein or on experimental conditions, such as a high mRNA concentration, even if translocation can be demonstrated. (5) A rough extrapolation to the conditions in vivo indicates that all synthesized polypeptide chains destined for translocation across or integration into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane are indeed quantitatively translocated and that no translational inhibition occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2821280     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90186-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  19 in total

Review 1.  Ribonucleoparticle-independent transport of proteins into mammalian microsomes.

Authors:  R Zimmermann; M Zimmermann; H Wiech; G Schlenstedt; G Müller; F Morel; P Klappa; C Jung; W W Cobet
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.945

2.  SRP keeps polypeptides translocation-competent by slowing translation to match limiting ER-targeting sites.

Authors:  Asvin K K Lakkaraju; Camille Mary; Anne Scherrer; Arthur E Johnson; Katharina Strub
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Synonymous codons, ribosome speed, and eukaryotic gene expression regulation.

Authors:  Daniel Tarrant; Tobias von der Haar
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  In vitro processing of dengue virus structural proteins: cleavage of the pre-membrane protein.

Authors:  L Markoff
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Cassette mutagenic analysis of the yeast invertase signal peptide: effects on protein translocation.

Authors:  J K Ngsee; W Hansen; P Walter; M Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  A truncation in the 14 kDa protein of the signal recognition particle leads to tertiary structure changes in the RNA and abolishes the elongation arrest activity of the particle.

Authors:  Y Thomas; N Bui; K Strub
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Escherichia coli SRP, its protein subunit Ffh, and the Ffh M domain are able to selectively limit membrane protein expression when overexpressed.

Authors:  Ido Yosef; Elena S Bochkareva; Eitan Bibi
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 7.867

8.  Effects of replacement of promoters and modification of the leader peptide region of the amy gene of Streptomyces griseus on synthesis and secretion of alpha-amylase by Streptomyces lividans.

Authors:  T Vigal; J A Gil; A Daza; M D García-González; P Villadas; J F Martín
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1991-12

Review 9.  Fidelity of cotranslational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Shu-ou Shan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.981

10.  Ribosome pausing and stacking during translation of a eukaryotic mRNA.

Authors:  S L Wolin; P Walter
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.