Lilian Riad-Allen1, Sarah Siodmok Dermody1, Yarissa Herman1, Kim Bellissimo1, Peter Selby1,2, Tony Peter George1,3. 1. Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Departments of Family and Community Medicine, Psychiatry and Dalla Lana School of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Divison of Brain and Therapeutics, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Complete tobacco bans in mental health facilities are thought to have the potential for adverse consequences. We evaluated staff and patient attitudes and adverse events associated with implementing Canada's largest, multi-site academic psychiatric hospital tobacco ban. METHODS: A total of 1,173 staff and 422 patients completed an anonymous attitudes survey at prior to implementation (baseline), and 4-6 months and 10-12 months post-implementation. The tobacco-free initiative was implemented in a phased approach, allowing the prospective measurement of changes in attitudes and adverse outcomes such as agitation over a 1-year period. RESULTS: We observed positive changes in staff and patient attitudes toward the tobacco-free policy for both staff and patients. Moreover, there was also a statistically significant decrease in patient agitation F (2, 99) = 3.25, p = .04, but no change F (2, 21) = 1.09, p = .35 in fire-related incidents. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: We observed positive changes in staff and patients attitudes and significant decrease in patient agitation during the first year of this tobacco-free hospital initiative. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: During the first year of this tobacco-free psychiatric hospital policy, implementation of a tobacco-free environment in a large mental health and addictions setting was feasible and perceived as desirable by the majority of staff and patients surveyed and a decrease in incidents related to patient agitation was also observed. Further well-controlled studies with longer study durations are warranted. (Am J Addict 2017;26:183-191).
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Complete tobacco bans in mental health facilities are thought to have the potential for adverse consequences. We evaluated staff and patient attitudes and adverse events associated with implementing Canada's largest, multi-site academic psychiatric hospital tobacco ban. METHODS: A total of 1,173 staff and 422 patients completed an anonymous attitudes survey at prior to implementation (baseline), and 4-6 months and 10-12 months post-implementation. The tobacco-free initiative was implemented in a phased approach, allowing the prospective measurement of changes in attitudes and adverse outcomes such as agitation over a 1-year period. RESULTS: We observed positive changes in staff and patient attitudes toward the tobacco-free policy for both staff and patients. Moreover, there was also a statistically significant decrease in patientagitation F (2, 99) = 3.25, p = .04, but no change F (2, 21) = 1.09, p = .35 in fire-related incidents. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: We observed positive changes in staff and patients attitudes and significant decrease in patientagitation during the first year of this tobacco-free hospital initiative. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: During the first year of this tobacco-free psychiatric hospital policy, implementation of a tobacco-free environment in a large mental health and addictions setting was feasible and perceived as desirable by the majority of staff and patients surveyed and a decrease in incidents related to patientagitation was also observed. Further well-controlled studies with longer study durations are warranted. (Am J Addict 2017;26:183-191).
Authors: Sabrina Voci; Susan Bondy; Laurie Zawertailo; Louise Walker; Tony P George; Peter Selby Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Michael Fendrich; Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti; Timothy P Johnson; Amy Hubbell; Joseph S Wislar Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Elena Ratschen; John Britton; Gillian A Doody; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Ann McNeill Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Debbie Robson; Gilda Spaducci; Ann McNeill; Mary Yates; Melissa Wood; Sol Richardson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andrea Niederhauser; Stephanie Züllig; Jonas Marschall; Alexander Schweiger; Gregor John; Stefan P Kuster; David Lb Schwappach Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 2.692