Literature DB >> 28211888

Discrepancies between the percentage of plasma cells in bone marrow aspiration and BM biopsy: Impact on the revised IMWG diagnostic criteria of multiple myeloma.

N Lee1, S Y Moon1, J-H Lee1, H-K Park2, S-Y Kong3, S-M Bang4, J H Lee5, S-S Yoon6, D S Lee1,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28211888      PMCID: PMC5386332          DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2017.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


× No keyword cloud information.
Diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) is based on diagnostic criteria which include clonal plasma cell (PC) percentage, quantity of monoclonal protein and presence of CRAB symptoms (hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, bone lesion).[1, 2] According to the previously adopted world health organization (WHO) 2008 criteria, the presence of clonal plasma cells is considered as key evidence of clonal plasma cell proliferation, irrespective of the percentage of PC and CRAB features. However, some patients with related organ or tissue impairment symptoms show <10% plasma cells in bone marrow (BM) aspiration. Empirically, there are three indwelling problems with the original criteria utilizing the percentage of plasma cells. Firstly, BM aspiration (BMA) diluted by peripheral blood results in variable plasma cell percentages. At present, no consensus has been made on the ideal diagnostic amount of BM aspirate. Usually, the amount varies from 0.3 to 3 ml depending on the practitioner. Secondly, uneven distribution of plasma cells or patchy infiltration can result in markedly discrepant counts of plasma cells between BMA and biopsy. Thirdly, counting plasma cell % using BM biopsy (BMB) lacks objectiveness, thus making it inapplicable for routine diagnosis. Recently, international myeloma working group (IMWG) presented revised criteria on plasma cell requirement. In the revised criteria, the percentage of BM plasma cells was emphasized for the diagnosis and discrimination between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and MM. The most important criterion in diagnosing MM is the presence of clonal plasma cells >10%, whilst a major change from previous criteria is that CRAB features no longer serve as evidence of clonal PC proliferation if bone marrow plasmacytosis is less than 10% and there is no biopsy-proven plasmacytoma.[3, 4, 5] In addition, to exclude sampling error or patchy bone marrow involvement, IMWG recommend plasma cell % either by aspiration or biopsy, with the higher value being used in cases of discrepancy. This is a modification to the previous version which indicated BMB PC% as non-mandatory.[6] The percentage of BM PC is also mentioned as a biomarker of malignancy, with a percentage greater than 60% regarded as a myeloma defining event.[7, 8, 9] Overall, the exact measurement of BM PC is becoming more crucial for the diagnosis of MM, and the introduction of CD138 immunohistochemical stain using BMB has made it possible for more accurate PC counts.[2, 10, 11] We designed this study to evaluate PC% of BMB in patients with low BMA PC (<10%) and tracked the conversion rate from BMA PC (<10%) to BMB PC (⩾10%). A total of 389 patients newly diagnosed with MM were enrolled and 67 patients of BMA PC count below 10% were selected. Among 73 cases (67 patients with aspiration PC<10% and 6 patients with unknown PC percentage), 58 were available for analysis of BMB (Figure 1a). For image analysis, CD138 staining using ultraView Universal DAB Detection Kit on BM section was conducted and Image J software, provided by National Institutes of Health (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) was utilized. After obtaining the full slide image, the representative image (area cover per spot, 0.96 mm2) was selected, and according to the guidelines, the thresholds of hue, saturation, and brightness were adjusted to detect the cytoplasm of plasma cells and nucleus of the other cells (Figure 1b). The total area of plasma cells and the other cells were evaluated separately, and divided by the average size of each cell to count the number of corresponding cells.
Figure 1

(a) Flow chart for patient selection and study design. In a total of 389 newly diagnosed MM patients, 81.2% (316/389) patients had a PC >10%, and the remaining 18.8% (73/389) of patients had either a PC <10% or were unavailable for BMA PC estimation. Of these 73 patients, 55 patients showed PC >10% after estimation by image analysis in bone marrow biopsy. (b) Screenshot of plasma cell counting via ImageJ software program. Cytoplasm of plasma cells stained with CD138 is represented in red. Adjustment of the ‘Hue', ‘Saturation', and ‘Brightness' thresholds using ImageJ. (c) Distribution of BMB PC percentage among patients with BMA PC less than 10%. When the PC percentage was divided by an interval of 10%, distribution of BMB PC % showed a bimodal peak of 20-30% and 90-100%. (d) Classification of patients by bone marrow aspiration quality. Only 39.7% of patients had adequate aspiration quality; the remaining 60.3% of patients had mild to severe dilution. Patchy infiltration/site variation of plasma cell infiltration was shown in 7 patients. MM, multiple myeloma; BM, bone marrow; PC, plasma cell; BMA PC, bone marrow aspiration plasma cell; BMB PC, bone marrow biopsy plasma cell.

From the aforementioned 58 cases, 55 patients demonstrated a BMB PC count of ⩾10%, and only 3 patients showed a BM PC count below 10% (Figure 1a). Mean percentage of PC in BMB was 52.9%, with a standard deviation of 30.7. Interestingly, we observed a bimodal peak in the 20-30% PC percentage group and packed marrow (90-100%) group (Figure 1c). Upon review of BM reports for specimen adequacy, the aspiration quality of only 39.7% of the patients was adequate, and the remaining 60.3% of patients either had mild to severe dilution, or few visible particles. Most of the patients with diluted BMA were found to have an increased PC% on BMB. Patchy infiltration or site variation of plasma cell infiltration was observed in seven patients (Figure 1d). Clinical features assessed at diagnosis including age, sex, anthropometric laboratory values, and molecular parameters were evaluated by a non-parametric method. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of BMA PC% (⩾10% or <10%) and the patients with BMA PC<10% were further subdivided into two groups on the basis of BMB PC% (⩾10% or <10%). Creatinine and total protein were statistically significant to be higher in BMA PC⩾10% patients than those of BMA PC<10% patients by Mann-Whitney test, whilst albumin was significantly lower in BMA PC⩾10% patients than that of BMA PC<10% patients (Table 1a).
Table 1A

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population

 BMA PC<10%a
BMA PC⩾10% (n=316)P valuea
 BMB PC⩾10% (n= 55)BMB PC<10% (n= 3)  
Age, year62.3±11.560.6±10.163±10.3NS
Male:Female30:252:01172:144NS
Hemoglobin (gdl−1)10.2±2.88.9±1.89.4±2.5NS
Calcium (mgdl−1)9.0±0.98.6±1.59.1±1.1NS
BUN (mgdl−1)21.0±14.08.3±2.124.2±16.9NS
Creatinine (mgdl−1)1.5±1.80.8±0.21.9±1.90.002
β2-Microglobulin (mgdl−1)6.0±5.64.8±2.17.2±6.9NS
Total Protein (mgdl−1)7.3±1.77.4±1.58.0±2.10.025
Albumin (mgdl−1)3.6±0.72.8±0.73.4±0.80.006
BM aspiration PC%4.2±3.54.1±2.739.5±23.4<0.001
BM section PC%32.2±17.84.0±4.0N/ANS

Abbreviations: BMA, bone marrow aspiration; BMB, bone marrow biopsy; PC, plasma cell; CRAB, hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, bone lesion; PEP, protein electrophoresis; N/A, not assessed; NS, not significant.

Values are presented as mean and standard deviation.

Patients were classified into two sub-groups according to bone marrow section plasma cell percentage.

P-value for Mann-Whitney test between group with BMA PC<10% and group with BMA PC⩾10%.

Additionally, the patients who showed BMA PC% below 10% (a total of 58 patients) were enrolled for investigating the correlation of related clinical parameters. There were moderate positive correlations of β2-microglobulin, BUN, and free light chain (FLC) ratio with BMB PC%, and calcium showed mild correlation with BMB PC%. Correlations of aberrant FISH results among PC% were statistically significant in RB1 deletion, IgH rearrangement, and 1q gain (Table 1b). These patients were also evaluated for prognostic importance. Overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier estimation showed adverse survival rates in high BMB PC% compared to low BMB PC% group (p=0.010). The cutoff value was set as the mean of total BMB PC%, and median OS for high and low BMB PC% group was 93.2 and 67.9 months, respectively (Supplementary Figure 1A). Conversely, BMA PC% showed no significant difference in survival times when analyzed with the same parameters (Supplementary Figure 1B). Univariate Cox analysis showed increased creatinine, BMB PC%, and FLC ratio over 100 to be significantly associated with adverse OS. Among the FISH results, percentage of RB deletion and IgH rearrangement were represented to significant factors (Table 1c).
Table 1B

Correlation statistics of PC% in BMB with results of FISH and clinical parameters

 Correlation coefficient (r2)P-value
Hemoglobin (gdl−1)−0.2540.054
Total calcium (mgdl−1)0.3040.021
BUN0.6830.004
Creatinine (mgdl−1)0.3420.009
FLC ratio (>100 or <0.01)0.575<0.001
β2-microglobulin0.6450.009
 
FISH
 RB1 deletion (%)0.3060.034
 IgH rearrangement (%)0.3470.016
 Trisomy 1 (%)0.3870.007

Abbreviations: BMB, bone marrow biopsy; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; FLC, free light chain; PC, plasma cell.

Table 1C

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors significantly associated with overall survival among patients (n=58) with BMA PC less than 10%.

VariablesUnivariate analysis
 Hazard ratio (HR)95% Confidential Interval (CI)P-value
Hemoglobin (gdl−1)1.030.80-1.310.841
Total calcium (mgdl−1)1.410.79-2.540.249
Creatinine (mgdl−1)1.251.06-1.480.010
Bone lesion1.120.34-3.700.846
 
FISH
 RB1 deletion (%)1.031.00-1.070.034
 IgH rearrangement (%)1.041.01-1.070.010
 p16 deletion (%)0.010.00-1117.10.963
 Trisomy 1 (%)1.031.00-1.070.053
BMA PC (%)0.910.74-1.080.239
BMB PC (%)1.041.02-1.070.002
FLC ratio (>100 vs ⩽100)11.12.22-55.070.003

Abbreviations: BMA, bone marrow aspiration; BMB, bone marrow biopsy; FLC, free light chain; PC, plasma cell.

In the present study, we analyzed the percentage of BMB PC in MM patients with low BMA PC (<10%). Objective measurement of PC% in BM biopsy was performed with BM section stained with CD138, using an image analyzer. The conversion rate of BMA PC <10% patients to >10% in BMB was 75.0% (55/73 patients). Most patients with less than 10% of BMA PC% had diluted BM aspiration and showed diffuse infiltration of plasma cells in BMB, whilst several other patients showed patchy or site varied infiltration. According to a previous report, about 4% of patients diagnosed with MM showed low plasma cell counts (<10%).[12] Also, there has been many studies reporting the discrepancy of BMA and BMB.[10, 13] It would currently be difficult to diagnosis myeloma with only a BMA specimen, thus BMB PC% is expected to help calculate the exact PC amount in each patient. The recently revised IMWG MM criteria also indicate that the higher PC count of either aspiration or biopsy should be considered in cases of discrepancy between specimens. In addition, we found that BMB PC% moderately correlated with corresponding end organ disorders, quantitative FISH results, and overall survival in patients with low BMA PC%. In these patients, BMB PC% better reflected the recently revised criteria rather than BMA PC%. These results were concordant with previous reports that the combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is more suitable for the prediction of prognosis in multiple myeloma.[14] Collectively, BMB PC count has more biologic significance in patients with low BMA PC%, and could provide both reliability and diagnostic accuracy in cases with discrepancy. In conclusion, this is the first in-depth study to have proven that a significant proportion of the low BMA PC% group converted to BMB PC ⩾10% group. In the present study, we tried to overcome the lack of objectiveness for counting BMB PC% by applying image analysis (imageJ software) of CD138+ cells in BM biopsy. Despite previous attempts to count accurate PC% via multicolor flow cytometry[15] or computer assisted image analysis,[14] those studies were not practical enough to be incorporated into clinical practice. PC count by image analysis prove to be a practically feasible solution when complemented with automation. In MM, quantification of plasma cells is crucial for diagnosis and prognostication, and the PC count is re-emphasized in the revised IMWG guideline. Since plasma cell counts on BMA or BMB alone harbors the risk of not reflecting the true plasma cell burden, we suggest that the higher value of the PC% among BMB or BMA should be used. In addition, we recommend the potential use of image analysis as a routine tool for objective PC counting in BMB.
  14 in total

1.  Assessment of bone marrow plasma cell infiltrates in multiple myeloma: the added value of CD138 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Samer Z Al-Quran; Lijun Yang; James M Magill; Raul C Braylan; Vonda K Douglas-Nikitin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Dirk Larson; Robert A Kyle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Methods for estimation of bone marrow plasma cell involvement in myeloma: predictive value for response and survival in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  S V Rajkumar; R Fonseca; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; J A Lust; T E Witzig; T M Therneau; R A Kyle; P R Greipp; M A Gertz
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Multiparameter flow cytometry quantification of bone marrow plasma cells at diagnosis provides more prognostic information than morphological assessment in myeloma patients.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Maria-Belén Vidriales; Jose J Pérez; Gema Mateo; Maria Angeles Montalbán; Maria Victoria Mateos; Joan Bladé; Juan José Lahuerta; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Modeling progression risk for smoldering multiple myeloma: results from a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Benjamin M Cherry; Neha Korde; Mary Kwok; Elisabet E Manasanch; Manisha Bhutani; Marcia Mulquin; Diamond Zuchlinski; Mary Ann Yancey; Irina Maric; Katherine R Calvo; Raul Braylan; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Constance Yuan; Prashant Tembhare; Adriana Zingone; Rene Costello; Mark J Roschewski; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-07-29

6.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Bone marrow trephine combined with immunohistochemistry is superior to bone marrow aspirate in follow-up of myeloma patients.

Authors:  R Joshi; D Horncastle; K Elderfield; I Lampert; A Rahemtulla; K N Naresh
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Thomas E Witzig; John A Lust; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; S Vincent Rajkumar; Janice R Offord; Dirk R Larson; Matthew E Plevak; Terry M Therneau; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Extensive bone marrow infiltration and abnormal free light chain ratio identifies patients with asymptomatic myeloma at high risk for progression to symptomatic disease.

Authors:  E Kastritis; E Terpos; L Moulopoulos; M Spyropoulou-Vlachou; N Kanellias; E Eleftherakis-Papaiakovou; M Gkotzamanidou; M Migkou; M Gavriatopoulou; M Roussou; A Tasidou; M A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  Monoclonal gammopathy-associated proliferative glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sethi; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  European Myeloma Network recommendations on tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma: what to use and when.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Laurent Garderet; K Martin Kortüm; Michael E O'Dwyer; Niels W C J van de Donk; Mascha Binder; Sandra Maria Dold; Francesca Gay; Jill Corre; Yves Beguin; Heinz Ludwig; Alessandra Larocca; Christoph Driessen; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Mario Boccadoro; Martin Gramatzki; Sonja Zweegman; Hermann Einsele; Michele Cavo; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Pieter Sonneveld; Michel Delforge; Holger W Auner; Evangelos Terpos; Monika Engelhardt
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Mate pair sequencing outperforms fluorescence in situ hybridization in the genomic characterization of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  James Smadbeck; Jess F Peterson; Kathryn E Pearce; Beth A Pitel; Andrea Lebron Figueroa; Michael Timm; Dragan Jevremovic; Min Shi; A Keith Stewart; Esteban Braggio; Daniel L Riggs; P Leif Bergsagel; George Vasmatzis; Hutton M Kearney; Nicole L Hoppman; Rhett P Ketterling; Shaji Kumar; S Vincent Rajkumar; Patricia T Greipp; Linda B Baughn
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 11.037

3.  Deep Learning Accurately Quantifies Plasma Cell Percentages on CD138-Stained Bone Marrow Samples.

Authors:  Fred Fu; Angela Guenther; Ali Sakhdari; Trevor D McKee; Daniel Xia
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-02-05

4.  Utility of PET/CT in assessing early treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Charalampos Charalampous; Utkarsh Goel; Stephen M Broski; David Dingli; Prashant Kapoor; Morie A Gertz; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis Buadi; Lisa Hwa; Nelson Leung; Yi Lin; Wilson I Gonsalves; Taxiarchis V Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Moritz Binder; Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-05-10

5.  Prognostic impact of posttransplant FDG PET/CT scan in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marcella Kaddoura; David Dingli; Francis K Buadi; Martha Q Lacy; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Prashant Kapoor; Lisa Hwa; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Suzanne Hayman; John Lust; Nelson Leung; Ronald S Go; Yi Lin; Wilson Gonsalves; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; Robert A Kyle; Stephen M Broski; Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-07-13

6.  Whole-genome optical mapping of bone-marrow myeloma cells reveals association of extramedullary multiple myeloma with chromosome 1 abnormalities.

Authors:  Eva Kriegova; Regina Fillerova; Jiri Minarik; Jakub Savara; Jirina Manakova; Anna Petrackova; Martin Dihel; Jana Balcarkova; Petra Krhovska; Tomas Pika; Petr Gajdos; Marek Behalek; Michal Vasinek; Tomas Papajik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Biological properties of bone marrow plasma cells influence their recovery in aspirate specimens: impact on classification of plasma cell disorders and potential bias to evaluation of treatment response.

Authors:  Svitlana Demyanets; Alexandra Kaider; Ingrid Simonitsch-Klupp; Günther Bayer; Almira Subasic; Renate Thalhammer; Harald Esterbauer; Maria T Krauth; Hermine Agis; Thomas Reiter; Ilse Schwarzinger
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.673

8.  Pericentromeric Non-Coding DNA Transcription Is Associated with Niche Impairment in Patients with Ineffective or Partially Effective Multiple Myeloma Treatment.

Authors:  Natella I Enukashvily; Natalia Semenova; Anna V Chubar; Dmitry I Ostromyshenskii; Ekaterina A Gushcha; Sergei Gritsaev; Stanislav S Bessmeltsev; Viktor I Rugal; Egor M Prikhodko; Ivan Kostroma; Anastasia Zherniakova; Anastasia V Kotova; Liubov A Belik; Alexander Shumeev; Irina I Maslennikova; Dmitry I Ivolgin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.