| Literature DB >> 28210996 |
Tadashi Watabe1,2, Yasukazu Kanai3,4, Hayato Ikeda5, Genki Horitsugi5, Keiko Matsunaga3,4, Hiroki Kato5,3, Kayako Isohashi5,3, Kohji Abe3,4,6, Eku Shimosegawa5,3,4, Jun Hatazawa5,3,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intratumoral hypoxia is one of the resistant factors in radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cancer. Although it is detected by 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) PET, the relationship between intratumoral hypoxia and oxygen metabolism has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intratumoral perfusion and oxygen metabolism in hypoxic regions using the rat xenograft model. Ten male Fischer rats with C6 glioma (body weight = 220 ± 15 g) were investigated with 18F-FMISO PET and steady-state inhalation method of 15O-labelled gases PET. The tumoral blood flow (TBF), tumoral metabolic rate of oxygen (TMRO2), oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), and tumoral blood volume (TBV) were measured under artificial ventilation with 15O-CO2, 15O-O2, and 15O-CO gases. Multiple volumes of interest (1-mm diameter sphere) were placed on the co-registered 18F-FMISO (3 h post injection) and functional 15O-labelled gases PET images. The TBF, TMRO2, OEF, and TBV values were compared among the three groups classified by the 18F-FMISO uptake as follows: group Low (L), less than 1.0; group Medium (M), between 1.0 and 2.0; and group High (H), more than 2.0 in the 18F-FMISO standardized uptake value (SUV).Entities:
Keywords: Blood flow; Fluoromisonidazole; Hypoxia; Oxygen consumption; PET
Year: 2017 PMID: 28210996 PMCID: PMC5313496 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0263-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Number of animals and tumor regions which were included in the analysis
| PET | Animal | Tumor |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic 18F-FMISO PET (60 min) | 4 | 8 |
| Static 18F-FMISO PET (3 h post injection) | 10 | 20 |
| 15O–CO2 PET (TBF) | 10 | 20 |
| 15O–O2 PET (TMRO2 and OEF) | 9 | 18 |
| 15O–CO PET (TBV) | 10 | 20 |
In one rat, TMRO2 and OEF images were not generated and excluded from the evaluation due to the technical reason
Fig. 1a The time activity curves of maximum SUV in the tumor and background tissue of 18F-FMISO PET. b Coronal images of 18F-FMISO PET and PET/CT fusion (3 h post injection). Tumors are located in the bilateral shoulder region of rats (red arrows)
Mean ± standard deviation values of BP, HR, and arterial blood gas data during PET measurement
| Systolic/diastolic BP (mmHg) | 119 ± 14/90 ± 10 |
| HR (bpm) | 379 ± 16 |
| pH | 7.420 ± 0.027 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 42.4 ± 3.2 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 113.3 ± 30.2 |
| SaO2 (%) | 97.1 ± 2.1 |
Fig. 2The time activity curves (mean ± standard deviation) of whole tumor of 15O-labelled gases PET (15O–CO2 and 15O–O2 gases, radioactivity count without decay correction; 15O–CO gas, radioactivity count with decay correction)
Fig. 3a Functional images of 15O-labelled gases PET using 6-min data during steady-state acquisition (coronal slices of PET/CT fusion). TBF and TMRO2 images showed marginal dominant distribution (arrow). OEF images showed partial elevation in the area close to the center (arrow head) and TBV images showed a high spot in the marginal zone of the tumor (arrow head). b Axial, c coronal, and d sagittal images of 18F-FMISO PET (rainbow color scale), TBF PET (fire color scale), and co-registered fusion images. The upper figures are tumors in the right side and the lower figures are tumors in the left side
Fig. 4a Relationships between the 18F-FMISO SUV and quantitative values of TBF, TMRO2, OEF, and TBV. b Quantitative values (mean ± standard deviation) of group Low with less than 1.0 in 18F-FMISO SUV, group Medium with between 1.0 and 2.0 in 18F-FMISO SUV, and group High with more than 2 in 18F-FMISO SUV (**p < 0.01 with the multiple comparison test)
Fig. 5Immunohistochemistry of the intratumoral hypoxic region (pimonidazole staining). a Overall image of the tumor (summed image of ×20 magnification), b boundary zone: red color square, c hypoxic region: yellow color square, and d necrotic region: blue color square (×200 magnification)
Fig. 6Comparison among pimonidazole staining, 18F-FMISO PET, TBF, and fusion image. Co-registered 18F-FMISO and TBF images were resliced to the same section as pimonidazole staining for comparison using the PMOD software