Literature DB >> 28210818

Open-circuit respirometry: a brief historical review of the use of Douglas bags and chemical analyzers.

Roy J Shephard1,2.   

Abstract

The Douglas bag technique is reviewed as one in a series of articles looking at historical insights into measurement of whole body metabolic rate. Consideration of all articles looking at Douglas bag technique and chemical gas analysis has here focused on the growing appreciation of errors in measuring expired volumes and gas composition, and subjective reactions to airflow resistance and dead space. Multiple small sources of error have been identified and appropriate remedies proposed over a century of use of the methodology. Changes in the bag lining have limited gas diffusion, laboratories conducting gas analyses have undergone validation, and WHO guidelines on airflow resistance have minimized reactive effects. One remaining difficulty is a contamination of expirate by dead space air, minimized by keeping the dead space <70 mL. Care must also be taken to ensure a steady state, and formal validation of the Douglas bag method still needs to be carried out. We may conclude that the Douglas bag method has helped to define key concepts in exercise physiology. Although now superceded in many applications, the errors in a meticulously completed measurement are sufficiently low to warrant retention of the Douglas bag as the gold standard when evaluating newer open-circuit methodology.

Keywords:  Dead space; Expired gas volumes; Gas analysis; Gas diffusion; Haldane apparatus; Respiratory resistance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28210818     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3556-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  3 in total

1.  Energy expenditure during paddling.

Authors:  V Seliger; I Pachlopníková; M Mann; R Selecká; J Treml
Journal:  Physiol Bohemoslov       Date:  1969-07

2.  Variance of direct and indirect measurements of aerobic power.

Authors:  G R Wright; K Sidney; R J Shephard
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  A comparison of paramagnetic and chemical methods for the determination of oxygen.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1966-08-04
  3 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Foundational insights into the estimation of whole-body metabolic rate.

Authors:  Nigel A S Taylor; Roy J Shephard; Michael I Lindinger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Open-circuit respirometry: a historical review of portable gas analysis systems.

Authors:  Duncan J Macfarlane
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  State of Knowledge on Molecular Adaptations to Exercise in Humans: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kaleen M Lavin; Paul M Coen; Liliana C Baptista; Margaret B Bell; Devin Drummer; Sara A Harper; Manoel E Lixandrão; Jeremy S McAdam; Samia M O'Bryan; Sofhia Ramos; Lisa M Roberts; Rick B Vega; Bret H Goodpaster; Marcas M Bamman; Thomas W Buford
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 8.915

4.  Clinical Correlates of Measured and Predicted Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients with Anorexia Nervosa: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rami Bou Khalil; Ariane Sultan; Maude Seneque; Sami Richa; Patrick Lefebvre; Eric Renard; Philippe Courtet; Laurent Maimoun; Sebastien Guillaume
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 5.  Open-circuit respirometry: real-time, laboratory-based systems.

Authors:  Susan A Ward
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The scaling of human basal and resting metabolic rates.

Authors:  Heather M Bowes; Catriona A Burdon; Nigel A S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Heat Acclimation Does Not Modify Q 10 and Thermal Cardiac Reactivity.

Authors:  Bernhard Kampmann; Peter Bröde
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  The use of a portable metabolic monitoring device for measuring RMR in healthy adults.

Authors:  Suey S Y Yeung; Marijke C Trappenburg; Carel G M Meskers; Andrea B Maier; Esmee M Reijnierse
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.718

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.