Literature DB >> 28209401

The Effect of Prophylactic Cerclage Wires in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study.

Andrew C Waligora1, John R Owen1, Jennifer S Wayne1, Shane R Hess1, Gregory J Golladay1, William A Jiranek1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite literature to support the use of various cerclage techniques to address intraoperative femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty, there are limited data to support prophylactic cerclage wiring of the femur during cementless implant placement. This study aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic calcar cerclage wires on the biomechanical parameters required to produce periprosthetic femoral fractures and on the morphology of these fracture patterns in stable cementless femoral implants.
METHODS: Ten pairs of matched fresh frozen cadaveric femurs were implanted with anatomic tapered cementless implants with or without the addition of 2 monofilament calcar wires. Specimens were axially loaded and externally rotated to failure. Initial torsional stiffness, rotation and energy to failure, and torque at failure were measured. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Fracture patterns were classified according to a well-known classification system.
RESULTS: Wired specimens required significantly more rotation (P = .039) and energy to failure (P = .048). No significant difference was detected in initial torsional stiffness (P = .63) or torque at failure (P = .10). All unwired samples developed a Vancouver B2 fracture pattern. Seven of the 8 wired specimens also developed a Vancouver B2 fracture pattern, while the eighth wired specimen developed a Vancouver B1 fracture pattern.
CONCLUSION: Prophylactic cerclage wire placement increases the rotation and energy to failure in well-fixed press-fit femoral implants. The increase in torsional energy needed for failure may reduce the risk of early periprosthetic fracture. Further studies are needed to evaluate cost vs benefit and long-term outcomes of prophylactic wiring. Based on the results of our study, consideration of prophylactic wiring should be addressed on a case-to-case basis.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; cementless; cerclage; fracture; hip; periprosthetic

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28209401     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Outcomes of cerclage wiring to manage intra-operative femoral fracture occurring during cementless hemiarthroplasty in older patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Nakarin Saiyudthong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The Impact of Prior Fragility Fractures on Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Austin J Ross; Bailey J Ross; Olivia C Lee; George N Guild; William F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-08-19

Review 3.  Strategies for managing the destruction of calcar femorale.

Authors:  Jin Mei; Lili Pang; Zhongchao Jiang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Intraoperative femoral fractures: Prevention is better than cure.

Authors:  P S Young; S Patil; R M D Meek
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Intraoperative Fractures during Short-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Saurabh Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Vikrant Manhas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-15

6.  Femur Strength is Similar Before and After Iatrogenic Fracture During Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Bailey J Ross; Akshar H Patel; J Heath Wilder; John M Weldy; Charles S Dranoff; Matthew J Weintraub; Nathan E Kim; Hao Wang; William F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-04

7.  More than a reposition tool: additional wire cerclage leads to increased load to failure in plate osteosynthesis for supracondylar femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Christopher Bliemel; Dan Anrich; Tom Knauf; Ludwig Oberkircher; Daphne Eschbach; Antonio Klasan; Florian Debus; Steffen Ruchholtz; Martin Bäumlein
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.