Literature DB >> 28209366

Quantifying Aortic Valve Calcification using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Abdulrahman M Alqahtani1, Kevin E Boczar2, Vinay Kansal2, Kwan Chan2, Girish Dwivedi2, Benjamin J W Chow3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Aortic valve calcification (AVC) has been associated with major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. We sought to develop and validate a method to quantify AVC using coronary CT angiography (CTA).
METHODS: Of 59 patients who underwent both non-contrast and contrast enhanced coronary CTA, 25 patients served as the derivation cohort and 34 patients served as the validation cohort. For non-contrast enhanced CT, quantification of AVC was performed using the Agatston method for coronary artery calcification (CAC). For contrast enhanced coronary CTA, a region of interest (ROI) was placed in the ascending aorta and the mean aortic attenuation value (HUAorta) and standard deviation (SD) were measured. Using a calcium threshold of mean HUAorta + 2SD, the AVCCTA was calculated. All other Agatston score parameters (weighting factors and area calculations) remained unchanged.
RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the correlation between AVCCAC and AVCCTA was excellent (r = 0.982). Using the line of best fit, a correction factor was calculated enabling the conversion of AVCCTA results to a AVCCAC equivalent (AVCCorrected = 1.868 × AVCCTA). Using this correction in the validation cohort, the correlation and agreement between AVCCAC and AVCCorrected were good (ICC = 0.939; 95% CI: 0.881-0.969; kappa = 0.700; 95% CI: 0.469-0.931).
CONCLUSION: The quantification of AVCCorrected using contrast enhanced CTA is feasible using a systematic approach with very good reliability and good agreement with AVCCAC. Larger-scale validation studies are needed to determine whether the use of AVCCAC can be eliminated in favour of AVCCorrected.
Copyright © 2017 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve calcification; Cardiac CT angiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28209366     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  8 in total

1.  Association of Time Between Left Ventricular and Aortic Systolic Pressure Peaks With Severity of Aortic Stenosis and Calcification of Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Kimi Sato; Arnav Kumar; Yash Jobanputra; Jorge Betancor; Mohamed Halane; Robin George; Vivek Menon; Amar Krishnaswamy; E Murat Tuzcu; Serge Harb; Wael A Jaber; Stephanie Mick; Lars G Svensson; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Impact of aortic valve calcification severity on device success after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jeremy Larroche; Loïc Panh; Thibault Lhermusier; Vincent Bataille; Marie-Agnès Marachet; Thomas Chollet; Antoine Petermann; Frederic Bouisset; Nicolas Boudou; Bertrand Marcheix; Hervé Rousseau; Michel Galinier; Didier Carrié; Olivier Lairez; Yoan Lavie-Badie
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Topographic Pattern of Valve Calcification: A New Determinant of Disease Severity in Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Antonio de Santis; Flavio Tarasoutchi; Jose de Arimatéia B Araujo Filho; Marcelo C Vieira; Cesar H Nomura; Marcelo Katz; Guilherme S Spina; Roney O Sampaio; Tarso A D Accorsi; Vitor E E Rosa; João R C Fernandes; Jonathan Brown; Elazer R Edelman; Pedro A Lemos
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12-13

4.  Paravalvular leak prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable prosthesis based on quantitative aortic calcification analysis.

Authors:  Agata Wiktorowicz; Adrian Wit; Krzysztof Piotr Malinowski; Artur Dziewierz; Lukasz Rzeszutko; Dariusz Dudek; Pawel Kleczynski
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-02

5.  New insights on potential permanent pacemaker predictors in TAVR using the largest self-expandable device.

Authors:  Verena Veulemans; Derk Frank; Hatim Seoudy; Steffen Wundram; Kerstin Piayda; Oliver Maier; Christian Jung; Amin Polzin; Norbert Frey; Malte Kelm; Tobias Zeus
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-12

6.  Aortic Root Calcification Score as an Independent Factor for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Hirofumi Okada; Hayato Tada; Kenshi Hayashi; Hiroki Kawashima; Tadanori Takata; Kenji Sakata; Atsushi Nohara; Hiroshi Mabuchi; Masakazu Yamagishi; Masa-Aki Kawashiri
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.928

7.  Estimation of Aortic Valve Calcium Score Based on Angiographic Phase Versus Reduction of Ionizing Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Paweł Gać; Bartłomiej Kędzierski; Piotr Macek; Krystyna Pawlas; Rafał Poręba
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23

8.  Aortic valve calcification is subject to aortic stenosis severity and the underlying flow pattern.

Authors:  Verena Veulemans; Kerstin Piayda; Oliver Maier; Georg Bosbach; Amin Polzin; Katharina Hellhammer; Shazia Afzal; Kathrin Klein; Lisa Dannenberg; Saif Zako; Christian Jung; Ralf Westenfeld; Malte Kelm; Tobias Zeus
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.037

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.