Literature DB >> 28209327

Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years: a systematic review.

Troy A Roberson1, Jared C Bentley1, James T Griscom2, Michael J Kissenberth1, Stefan J Tolan1, Richard J Hawkins1, John M Tokish3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite concerns about the longevity of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in young patients, it remains an attractive option because of the absence of superior options.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed using searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. English-language studies were identified with search terms "total shoulder arthroplasty" (title/abstract) or "shoulder replacement" (title/abstract) and "young" (title/abstract) or "under 65 years of age" (title/abstract). Duplicate studies, studies not reporting outcomes, and those using a humeral resurfacing technique were excluded. Outcomes of interest included pain, range of motion, patient-reported outcome scores, patient satisfaction, radiographic changes, complication and revision rates, and implant survival.
RESULTS: Six studies met inclusion criteria. Significant improvements in pain, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes were found across all studies that reported these measures. At an average of 9.4 years, 17.4% underwent revision and 54% had glenoid lucency. Whereas glenoid loosening is the most common reason for revision (52%), overall implant survivorship was reported at 60% to 80% at 10- to 20-year follow-up. Outcome measures including the Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were reported, with generally satisfactory but not excellent results between 3 and 10 years from surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there is concern with periprosthetic radiolucency and glenoid loosening in the young patient (<65 years) undergoing TSA, overall low revision rates and high implant survivorship are reported in the current literature. Whereas the patient-reported outcomes are inferior to those of the overall TSA population, there is significant improvement from baseline levels in young patients with glenohumeral arthritis.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Total shoulder arthroplasty; implant survivorship; outcomes; pain; range of motion; younger patients

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28209327     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  26 in total

1.  Assessment of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the scapula-weighted Constant-Murley score.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Ilaria Parel; Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Maria Vittoria Filippi; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Insurance Payer Type and Patient Income Are Associated with Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John D Cleveland
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 3.  [Options in joint-preserving surgical treatment of osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Marc-Frederic Pastor; Tomas Smith; Mathias Wellmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Friedrich; D Cucchi; S Walter; S Gravius; D C Wirtz; J Schmolders
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Return to Work After Shoulder Replacement for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Is Similar When Hemiarthroplasty Is Compared to Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph N Liu; Grant H Garcia; Anirudh K Gowd; Gregory Mahony; Alec Sinatro; Hao Hua Wu; David M Dines; Russell F Warren; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-06-17

6.  Preoperative Comorbidities and Postoperative Complications Do Not Influence Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Humeral Head Resurfacing: Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of 106 Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Beck; Hannah Lee; Mitchell Fourman; Juan Giugale; Jason Zlotnicki; Mark Rodosky; Albert Lin
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-02-13

7.  Arthroscopic management of glenohumeral arthritis in the young patient does not negatively impact the outcome of subsequent anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Corey J Schiffman; Anastasia J Whitson; Sagar S Chawla; Frederick A Matsen; Jason E Hsu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Evaluating Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: The Relative Impact of Patient Age, Activity Level, Symptoms, and Kellgren-Lawrence Grade on Treatment.

Authors:  Adam Schumaier; Joseph Abboud; Brian Grawe; J Gabriel Horneff; Charles Getz; Anthony Romeo; Jay Keener; Richard Friedman; Ed Yian; Stephanie Muh; Gregory Nicholson; Ruth Delaney; Randall Otto; William William; J T Tokish; Gerald Williams; Jack Kazanjian; Joshua Dines; Matthew Ramsey; Andrew Green; Scott Paxton; Surena Namdari; Brody Flanagin; Samer Hasan; Scott Kaar; Anthony Miniaci; Frances Cuomo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

9.  Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty is Associated with Increased Thirty-Day Postoperative Complications and Wound Infections Relative to Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Venkat Boddapati; Michael C Fu; William W Schairer; Lawrence V Gulotta; David M Dines; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-09-11

10.  Prevalence of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States and the Increasing Burden of Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin X Farley; Jacob M Wilson; Anjali Kumar; Michael B Gottschalk; Charles Daly; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Eric R Wagner
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.