Stacey Crane1, Marion E Broome2. 1. Predoctoral Fellow, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 2. Ruby F. Wilson Distinguished Professor and Dean, Vice-Chancellor for Nursing Affairs, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The past 20 years have seen distinct shifts in the way the participation of children and adolescents in research is viewed. This has been emphasized by the growing pediatric research enterprise. Additional information on children's and adolescents' experiences during research participation is needed to better inform researchers on the ethical conduct of research with this vulnerable population. AIMS: The objective of this analysis was to examine ethical issues in research with children and adolescents from their perspective as participants, including: assent, parental consent, risk perception, impact of research participation, and incentives. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted per the Long, Godfrey, Randall, Brettle, and Grant framework by means of an iterative searching process. Using the key words "research ethics" and "child or pediatric or adolescent," PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases were searched to identify articles. Limitations placed on the searches were: English language, year of publication between 2003 and 2014, humans, abstract available, and age birth-18 years. FINDINGS: Twenty-three empiric studies were identified and formed the sample. Included studies represented a diverse range of areas of research, methods, settings, sample demographics, authors, and journals. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Even young children demonstrated the ability to understand essential elements of research, although there is variability in children's level of understanding. Trust was a significant contributing factor to children's and adolescents' participation in research, and also shaped their assessments of risk. Research participation was mainly beneficial for children and adolescents. Incentives were mainly viewed positively, although concerns of possible undue influence were expressed.
BACKGROUND: The past 20 years have seen distinct shifts in the way the participation of children and adolescents in research is viewed. This has been emphasized by the growing pediatric research enterprise. Additional information on children's and adolescents' experiences during research participation is needed to better inform researchers on the ethical conduct of research with this vulnerable population. AIMS: The objective of this analysis was to examine ethical issues in research with children and adolescents from their perspective as participants, including: assent, parental consent, risk perception, impact of research participation, and incentives. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted per the Long, Godfrey, Randall, Brettle, and Grant framework by means of an iterative searching process. Using the key words "research ethics" and "child or pediatric or adolescent," PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases were searched to identify articles. Limitations placed on the searches were: English language, year of publication between 2003 and 2014, humans, abstract available, and age birth-18 years. FINDINGS: Twenty-three empiric studies were identified and formed the sample. Included studies represented a diverse range of areas of research, methods, settings, sample demographics, authors, and journals. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Even young children demonstrated the ability to understand essential elements of research, although there is variability in children's level of understanding. Trust was a significant contributing factor to children's and adolescents' participation in research, and also shaped their assessments of risk. Research participation was mainly beneficial for children and adolescents. Incentives were mainly viewed positively, although concerns of possible undue influence were expressed.
Authors: Dorian E Traube; Julie A Cederbaum; Dara Kerkorian; Chetan Bhupali; Mary M McKay Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Benedetto Vitiello; Christopher J Kratochvil; Susan Silva; John Curry; Mark Reinecke; Sanjeev Pathak; Bruce Waslick; Carroll W Hughes; Ernest D Prentice; Diane E May; John S March Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Kara Hawley; Jeannie S Huang; Matthew Goodwin; Damaris Diaz; Virginia R de Sa; Kathryn A Birnie; Christine T Chambers; Kenneth D Craig Journal: Ethics Behav Date: 2018-04-30
Authors: Thirimon Moe-Byrne; Peter Knapp; Daniel Perry; Juul Achten; Louise Spoors; Duncan Appelbe; Jenny Roche; Jacqueline M Martin-Kerry; Rebecca Sheridan; Steven Higgins Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Jacqueline M Martin-Kerry; Peter Knapp; Karl Atkin; Peter Bower; Ian Watt; Catherine Stones; Steven Higgins; Rebecca Sheridan; Jenny Preston; Danielle Horton Taylor; Paul Baines; Bridget Young Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Markus Saarijärvi; Lars Wallin; Philip Moons; Hanna Gyllensten; Ewa-Lena Bratt Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 4.615