| Literature DB >> 28205675 |
Petr Danecek1, Shane A McCarthy1.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Prediction of functional variant consequences is an important part of sequencing pipelines, allowing the categorization and prioritization of genetic variants for follow up analysis. However, current predictors analyze variants as isolated events, which can lead to incorrect predictions when adjacent variants alter the same codon, or when a frame-shifting indel is followed by a frame-restoring indel. Exploiting known haplotype information when making consequence predictions can resolve these issues.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28205675 PMCID: PMC5870570 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinformatics ISSN: 1367-4803 Impact factor: 6.937
Fig. 1Three types of compound variants that lead to incorrect consequence prediction when handled in a localized manner, i.e. each variant separately rather than jointly. (A) Multiple SNVs in the same codon result in a TAG stop codon rather than an amino acid change. (B) A deletion locally predicted as frame-shifting is followed by a frame-restoring variant. Two amino acids are deleted and one changed, the functional consequence on protein function is likely much less severe. (C) Two SNVs separated by an intron occur within the same codon in the spliced transcript. Unchanged areas are shaded for readability. All three examples were encountered in real data (Color version of this figure is available at Bioinformatics online.)
Summary of BCFtools/csq consequence type changes from localized (rows) to haplotype-aware (columns) calling in 1000 Genomes data
Note: Blue/orange background indicates a change to a less/more severe prediction in haplotype-aware calling. Only variants with modified predictions are included in the table. (Color version of this table is available at Bioinformatics online.)