| Literature DB >> 28205627 |
Gen Li1,2, Jian Sun2,3, Ke Ma2, Qingguang Yan2, Xiaolin Zheng1, Mingxin Qin2, Gui Jin2, Xu Ning2, Wei Zhuang2, Hua Feng3, Shiyuwei Huang2,4.
Abstract
The real-time monitoring and evaluation of the severity and progression of cerebral hemorrhage is essential to its intensive care and its successful emergency treatment. Based on magnetic induction phase shift technology combined with a PCI data acquisition system and LabVIEW software, this study established a real-time monitoring system for cerebral hemorrhage. To test and evaluate the performance of the system, the authors performed resolution conductivity experiments, salted water simulation experiments and cerebral hemorrhage experiments in rabbits and found that when the conductivity difference was 0.73 S/m, the phase difference was 13.196°. The phase difference change value was positively proportional to the volume of saline water, and the conductivity value was positively related to the phase difference of liquid under the same volume conditions. After injecting 3 mL blood into six rabbits, the average change in the blood phase difference was -2.03783 ± 0.22505°, and it was positively proportional to the volume of blood, which was consistent with the theoretical results. The results show that the system can monitor the progressive development of cerebral hemorrhage in real-time and has the advantages of low cost, small size, high phase accuracy, and good clinical application potentiality.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28205627 PMCID: PMC5311960 DOI: 10.1038/srep42842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Monitoring system of rabbit cerebral hemorrhage experiment. (b) The software platform.
Phase difference measurement results of different liquids.
| Target solution | Edema | Hemorrhage | Normal saline | Saline (5%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conductivity (S/m) | 0.281 | 1.101 | 3.6 | 5.85 |
| Phase difference (°) | 65.108 | 78.304 | 78.438 | 86.883 |
Figure 2Conductivity-phase characteristic fitting curve.
Figure 3MIPS changes in 4 different liquid injection processes.
(a) simulated edema fluid; (b) simulated cerebral hemorrhage solution; (c) physiological saline; (d) high-concentration saline (5%).
MIPS values after injecting 5 mL and 10 mL of 4 solutions of different conductivities.
| Target solution | MIPS (°) | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 mL | 10 mL | |
| Edema | 70.2040 ± 0.5360 | 94.2350 ± 0.1104 |
| Hemorrhage | 73.7142 ± 0.3616 | 98.9468 ± 0.1229 |
| Normal saline | 75.6464 ± 0.3994 | 103.3409 ± 0.1248 |
| Saline (5%) | 93.2278 ± 0.2534 | 105.6064 ± 0.1006 |
Figure 4(a) Original MIPS data for rabbit No. 1. (b) Original MIPS data for rabbit No. 1 from 0.6 mL to 0.7 mL. (c) MIPS data after signal preprocessing for rabbit No. 1.
Figure 5Mean MIPS value and standard deviation for 6 experimental rabbits and 5 control rabbits.
Figure 6MR image of the 98th slices of the sagittal plane for the experimental group rabbits with the increase in the blood volume injection.
From (1) to (10), the injected blood volumes are 0, 0.33 mL, 0.66 mL …to 3 mL. The red circle in (10) shows the injected blood.