Literature DB >> 28205124

Routine Radiologic Contrast Agent Examination After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Is Not Useful.

Benjamin Struecker1,2, Sascha Chopra3, Ann-Christin Heilmann3, Johanna Spenke3, Christian Denecke3, Igor M Sauer3, Marcus Bahra3, Johann Pratschke3, Andreas Andreou3,4, Matthias Biebl3.   

Abstract

Many studies have showed that routine upper gastrointestinal contrast agent examinations (RCE) for testing the patency of the anastomosis after esophagectomy or the stapler line after sleeve gastrectomy cannot be recommended due to low sensitivity. However, the clinical value of RCE after gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains unclear. We have retrospectively analyzed the clinical course of 377 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer in our institution between 2005 and 2015. To date, we have performed a RCE on the fifth postoperative day before removal of the nasogastric tube and return to oral intake. In total, we have observed 14 anastomotic leaks (AL) (4%) after oncologic gastrectomy. Four AL (28.6%) occurred before the scheduled RCE on the fifth postoperative day (POD) and 7 (50%) late AL after POD 5. Three patients (21.4%) without any clinical symptoms were diagnosed by the RCE. Sensitivity of RCE was 50%. A significant percentage of patients with AL was diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen (50%). The standard therapy for AL after gastrectomy was endoscopic stent placement (n = 11), including three cases of stenting after surgical revision. Based on our data, we cannot recommend a RCE after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The majority of AL occurs before or after a RCE and the sensitivity of the examination is low. In case of clinical suspicion of AL, a CT scan (with oral contrast agent) should be performed. In unclear cases, endoscopy is the preferable method providing the option of direct treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Gastric cancer; Routine radiologic contrast examination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28205124     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3384-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  17 in total

1.  7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach.

Authors:  Kay Washington
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Diagnostic sensitivity of contrast swallow for leakage after gastric resection.

Authors:  Hitoshi Tonouchi; Yasuhiko Mohri; Kouji Tanaka; Masaki Ohi; Minako Kobayashi; Koichiro Yamakado; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The role of upper gastrointestinal swallow study in patients undergoing proximal or total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jeroukhimov Igor; Natan Poluksht; Nava Siegelmann-Danieli; Ron Lavy; Ilan Wassermann; Zvi Halpern; Ruth Gold-Deutch; Ariel Halevy
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.892

Review 4.  The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Should routine assessment of anastomotic integrity be undertaken using radiological contrast swallow after oesophagectomy with intra-thoracic anastomosis? Best evidence topic (BET).

Authors:  Christopher M Jones; Brigette Clarke; Rebecca Heah; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 6.071

6.  Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.

Authors:  M B Tirnaksiz; C Deschamps; M S Allen; D C Johnson; P C Pairolero
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.745

Review 7.  Gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy: review of its prevention and management.

Authors:  Antoine Abou Rached; Melkart Basile; Hicham El Masri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Anastomotic leak predicts diminished long-term survival after resection for gastric and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Matthias Biebl; Mehran Dadras; Benjamin Struecker; Igor M Sauer; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Sascha Chopra; Panagiotis Fikatas; Marcus Bahra; Daniel Seehofer; Johann Pratschke; Sven-Christian Schmidt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Prospective study of routine contrast radiology after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  P J Lamb; S M Griffin; M V Chandrashekar; D L Richardson; D Karat; N Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The safety and efficacy of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) combination in the front-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: phase II trial.

Authors:  Abeer Hussien Anter; Rasha Mohamed Abdel-Latif
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.064

View more
  3 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction Improves Postoperative Outcomes: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Sebastian Knitter; Sascha Chopra; Christian Denecke; Moritz Schmelzle; Benjamin Struecker; Ann-Christin Heilmann; Johanna Spenke; Tobias Hofmann; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Marcus Bahra; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Biebl
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Normal and Abnormal Postoperative Imaging Findings after Gastric Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Cheong Il Shin; Se Hyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 3.  Early postoperative imaging after non-bariatric gastric resection: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Elena Bracchi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-06-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.