Literature DB >> 2820359

Cyclophosphamide in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Maintenance vs nonmaintenance therapy.

D E Goodkin, S Plencner, J Palmer-Saxerud, M Teetzen, D Hertsgaard.   

Abstract

Twenty-seven patients with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis were treated with high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide induction on either an impatient or outpatient basis. Following induction, patients were randomized to alternate-month outpatient "maintenance" or "no maintenance" therapy. These groups, as well as 24 nonrandomized control patients, were compared with each other after 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up. All groups were similar in age, sex, duration of disease, and degree of disability before treatment. Fifty-nine percent of all cyclophosphamide-treated patients were stable at 12 months compared with 17% of all patients in the nonrandomized control group at 12 months. A statistically significant difference persisted at 18 and 24 months. A trend favoring maintenance therapy when compared with no maintenance therapy was evident at 12, 18, and 24 months, but was not statistically significant. Inpatient vs outpatient induction therapy failed to influence treatment outcome. Toxic side effects of nausea and vomiting presented a serious obstacle to maintenance therapy as administered in this protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2820359     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520200027013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  10 in total

1.  Cyclophosphamide in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  L La Mantia; M Eoli; A Salmaggi; V Torri; C Milanese
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-02

Review 2.  Management of secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gavin Giovannoni
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Chemotherapeutics in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Bernd C Kieseier; Douglas R Jeffery
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 4.  Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L La Mantia; C Milanese; N Mascoli; R D'Amico; B Weinstock-Guttman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 5.  Immunosuppressive agents in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Oliver Neuhaus; Bernd C Kieseier; Hans-Peter Hartung
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 6.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The need for a new strategy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A N Davison
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Role of steroids and immunosuppression and effects of interferon beta-1b in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D E Goodkin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-09

9.  The combination of cyclophosphamide plus interferon beta as rescue therapy could be used to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients-- twenty-four months follow-up.

Authors:  Ester Reggio; Alessandra Nicoletti; Teresa Fiorilla; Guido Politi; Arturo Reggio; Francesco Patti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Stabilization of rapidly worsening multiple sclerosis for 36 months in patients treated with interferon beta plus cyclophosphamide followed by interferon beta.

Authors:  Francesco Patti; Ester Reggio; Filippo Palermo; Teresa Fiorilla; Guido Politi; Alessandra Nicoletti; Arturo Reggio
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.849

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.