Literature DB >> 17253481

Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis.

L La Mantia1, C Milanese, N Mascoli, R D'Amico, B Weinstock-Guttman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a presumed cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Cyclophosphamide (CFX) is a cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agent, used in systemic autoimmune diseases. Controversial results have been reported on its efficacy in MS. We conducted a systematic review of all relevant trials, evaluating the efficacy of CFX in patients with progressive MS.
OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to determine whether CFX slows the progression of MS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane MS Group Trials Register (searched June 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (January 1988 to June 2006) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of CFX treatment in patients affected by clinically definite progressive MS.CFX had to be administered alone or in combination with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or steroids. The comparison group had to be placebo or no treatment or the same co-intervention (ACTH or steroids) DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently decided the eligibility of the study, assessed the trial quality and extracted data. We also contacted study authors for original data. MAIN
RESULTS: Of the 461 identified references, we initially selected 70: only four RCTs were included for the final analysis. Intensive immunosuppression with CFX (alone or associated with ACTH or prednisone) in patients with progressive MS compared to placebo or no treatment (152 participants) did not prevent the long-term (12, 18, 24 months) clinical disability progression as defined as evolution to a next step of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. However, the mean change in disability (final disability subtracted from the baseline) significantly favoured the treated group at 12 (effect size - 0.21, 95% confidence interval - 0.25 to -0.17) and 18 months (- 0.19, 95% confidence interval - 0.24 to - 0.14) but favoured the control group at 24 months (0.14, CI 0.07 to 0.21). We were unable to verify the efficacy of other schedules. Five patients died; sepsis and amenorrhea frequently occurred in treated patients (descriptive analysis). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to achieve all of the objectives specified for the review. This review shows that the overall effect of CFX (administered as intensive schedule) in the treatment of progressive MS does not support its use in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17253481      PMCID: PMC8078225          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002819.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  84 in total

1.  Cyclophosphamide in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  L La Mantia; M Eoli; A Salmaggi; V Torri; C Milanese
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-02

2.  Interrater variability with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Functional Systems (FS) in a multiple sclerosis clinical trial. The Canadian Cooperation MS Study Group.

Authors:  J H Noseworthy; M K Vandervoort; C J Wong; G C Ebers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis with pulse cyclophosphamide/methylprednisolone: response to therapy is linked to the duration of progressive disease.

Authors:  M J Hohol; M J Olek; E J Orav; L Stazzone; D A Hafler; S J Khoury; D M Dawson; H L Weiner
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Bladder cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  D De Ridder; H van Poppel; L Demonty; B D'Hooghe; R Gonsette; H Carton; L Baert
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols.

Authors:  C M Poser; D W Paty; L Scheinberg; W I McDonald; F A Davis; G C Ebers; K P Johnson; W A Sibley; D H Silberberg; W W Tourtellotte
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  High-dose cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Timothy R McGuire; Peter Gwilt; Konstantine Manouvilov; Kathleen Healey; M M Ursick; Richard A Nash; Steven Z Pavletic
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.932

7.  [Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis with monthly pulsed cyclophosphamide-methylprednisolone: predictive factors of treatment response].

Authors:  E Delmont; S Chanalet; V Bourg; M-H Soriani; M Chatel; C Lebrun
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.607

8.  Clinical practice of immunosuppressive treatments in multiple sclerosis: results of a second international questionnaire.

Authors:  O R Hommes; H L Weiner
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Experience with cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis: the cons.

Authors:  W H Likosky
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Cyclophosphamide-induced cystitis and bladder cancer in patients with Wegener granulomatosis.

Authors:  C Talar-Williams; Y M Hijazi; M M Walther; W M Linehan; C W Hallahan; I Lubensky; G S Kerr; G S Hoffman; A S Fauci; M C Sneller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  [Choice of early and escalation treatment options for multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  R A Linker; B C Kieseier
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Drug therapy for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Eleonora Tavazzi; Marco Rovaris; Loredana La Mantia
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  [Intravenous immunoglobulins in multiple sclerosis. An update].

Authors:  S Schwarz; H-M Meinck; B Storch-Hagenlocher
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Authors:  Daniel Ontaneda; Robert J Fox; Jeremy Chataway
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  Disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Fabricio González-Andrade; José Luis Alcaraz-Alvarez
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 6.  The Use of Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Benedikt Kretzschmar; Hannah Pellkofer; Martin S Weber
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 7.  Treatment strategies for multiple sclerosis: When to start, when to change, when to stop?

Authors:  Alberto Gajofatto; Maria Donata Benedetti
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 8.  Disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: common and divergent current and future strategies.

Authors:  N Melzer; S G Meuth
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Development of antifibrotic therapy for stricturing Crohn's disease: lessons from randomized trials in other fibrotic diseases.

Authors:  Si-Nan Lin; Ren Mao; Chenchen Qian; Dominik Bettenworth; Jie Wang; Jiannan Li; David H Bruining; Vipul Jairath; Brian G Feagan; Min-Hu Chen; Florian Rieder
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  Lights and shadows of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Francesco Patti; Salvatore Lo Fermo
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2011-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.