| Literature DB >> 28203206 |
Gema Ruiz-Hurtado1, Concha F García-Prieto2, Helena Pulido-Olmo1, Juan P Velasco-Martín3, Palmira Villa-Valverde4, María E Fernández-Valle4, Lisardo Boscá5, María Fernández-Velasco6, Javier Regadera3, Beatriz Somoza2, María S Fernández-Alfonso7.
Abstract
Caloric restriction (CR) ameliorates cardiac dysfunction associated with obesity. However, most of the studies have been performed under severe CR (30-65% caloric intake decrease) for several months or even years in aged animals. Here, we investigated whether mild (20% food intake reduction) and short-term (2-weeks) CR prevented the obese cardiomyopathy phenotype and improved the metabolic profile of young (14 weeks of age) genetically obese Zucker fa/fa rats. Heart weight (HW) and HW/tibia length ratio was significantly lower in fa/fa rats after 2 weeks of CR than in counterparts fed ad libitum. Invasive pressure measurements showed that systolic blood pressure, maximal rate of positive left ventricle (LV) pressure, LV systolic pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure were all significantly higher in obese fa/fa rats than in lean counterparts, which were prevented by CR. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed that the increase in LV end-systolic volume, stroke volume and LV wall thickness observed in fa/fa rats was significantly lower in animals on CR diet. Histological analysis also revealed that CR blocked the significant increase in cardiomyocyte diameter in obese fa/fa rats. High resolution magic angle spinning magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis of the LV revealed a global decrease in metabolites such as taurine, creatine and phosphocreatine, glutamate, glutamine and glutathione, in obese fa/fa rats, whereas lactate concentration was increased. By contrast, fatty acid concentrations in LV tissue were significantly elevated in obese fa/fa rats. CR failed to restore the LV metabolomic profile of obese fa/fa rats. In conclusion, mild and short-term CR prevented an obesity-induced cardiomyopathy phenotype in young obese fa/fa rats independently of the cardiac metabolic profile.Entities:
Keywords: caloric restriction; hypertension; hypertrophy; metabolite profile; nuclear magnetic resonance; obesity-induced cardiomyopathy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28203206 PMCID: PMC5285365 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Scheme of experimental protocol (A) and body weight gain (B) of lean and fa/fa rats with and without caloric restriction. Half of the animals of each experimental group were fed with 80% of their daily food intake (CR) and the other half were maintained on AL diet. Data are mean±SEM (n = 8 animals per group). **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. lean AL group; +++P < 0.001 vs. lean CR group; ###P < 0.001 vs. fa/fa AL group.
Figure 2Left ventricular pressure characteristics of Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and (B) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in lean and fa/fa rats on AL or CR diet. (C) Maximal rate of pressure increase during systole (dP/dtmax) and maximal rate of pressure decay during diastole (dP/dtmin) in lean and fa/fa rats on AL and CR diet. (D) Peak left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) and (E) Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in lean and fa/fa rats on AL or CR diet. Data are mean±SEM (n = 7–12 animals per group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. lean AL rats; #P < 0.05 vs. fa/fa AL rats.
Figure 3Cardiac cycle MRI images. Representative transverse mid-papillary MR sections along the cardiac cycle obtained from lean and obese fa/fa rats with and without short and moderate caloric restriction.
Cardiac functional parameters determined by MRI.
| HR (bpm) | 275.8±15.5 | 307.7±17.3 | 284.7±18.4 | 293.2±15.1 |
| LVEDV (μL) | 374.5±36.4 | 387.9±12.7 | 494.3±23.8 | 399±33.2 |
| LVESV (μL) | 127.3±8.6 | 116.0±6.3 | 113.5±3.9 | 108.4±3.1 |
| EF (%) | 68.8±2.7 | 70.1±1.5 | 76.9±1.2 | 72.4±2.0 |
| SV (μL) | 256.9±26.0 | 271.9±11.5 | 380.8±22.7 | 290.7±31.8 |
| CO (mL/s) | 1.25±0.16 | 1.40±0.12 | 1.77±0.07 | 1.55±0.23 |
Data are mean ± SEM (N = 4–5 for each group). HR, heart rate; LV, left ventricular; LVEDV, LV end-diastolic volume; LVESD, LV end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output.
P < 0.05 vs. lean AL;
P < 0.05 vs. fa/fa AL.
Figure 4Heart dimensions and cardiomyocyte diameter of Heart weight (HW) (A) and HW to tibia length (TL) ratio (HW/TL) (B) of each group of animals. (C) Representative transverse mid-papillary MR sections during end diastole from lean and obese fa/fa rats with and without short and moderate caloric restriction. (D) Quantitative analysis of LV free wall thickness of each group of animals. Data are mean±SEM (n = 5 animals per group). *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. lean AL rats; #P < 0.05, ###P < 0.001 vs. fa/fa AL rats. (E) Representative images of cardiomyocyte cross-surfaces obtained from lean and fa/fa rats with and without short and moderate caloric restriction (bar: 100 μm). Micrographs of cardiomyocyte sections were stained with PAS reagent. (F) Quantitative analysis of cardiomyocyte diameter measured in μm of each group of animals. Data are mean±SEM (n = 5 animals per group). *** P < 0.005 vs. lean AL rats; ###P < 0.005 vs. fa/fa AL rats.
Metabolites identified by .
| Taurine (3.42) | 44.3±1.42 | 45.9±2.92 | 31.84±1.62 | 32.45±2.96 |
| Creatine | 64.3±1.67 | 61.7±4.03 | 42.2±1.28 | 43.1±3.14 |
| Glutamate (2.33) | 3.6±0.22 | 3.1±0.18 | 2.5±0.16 | 2.3±0.11 |
| Glutamine (3.78) | 14.8±0.44 | 13.9±0.51 | 9.6±0.56 | 10.2±0.79 |
| Glutamine/Glutamate | 4.2±0.32 | 4.5±0.30 | 3.9±0.14 | 4.4±0.34 |
| Glutathione (4.58) | 2.1±0.10 | 1.9±0.21 | 1.4±0.07 | 1.2±0.05 |
| Alanine (1.47) | 4.5±0.17 | 4.4±0.25 | 3.8±0.24 | 4.0±0.38 |
| Lactate (1.33) | 61.5±2.64 | 66.0±2.54 | 82.2±4.22 | 86.0±2.94 |
Data are mean ± SEM (n = 5 for each group).
P < 0.01,
P < 0.001 vs. lean AL;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01,
P < 0.001 vs. lean CR. Number between brackets correspond to the middle point of the bucket.
Fatty acids identified by .
| n-3 acyl chains | 36.5 ± 1.68 | 43.5 ± 4.86 | 60.7 ± 2.31 | 63.2 ± 5.82 |
| Unsaturated fatty acids | 2.5 ± 0.33 | 2.7 ± 0.37 | 5.7 ± 0.38 | 5.2 ± 0.59 |
| Poly-unsaturated fatty acids | 1.7 ± 0.05 | 1.7 ± 0.17 | 2.3 ± 0.11 | 2.1 ± 0.03 |
Data are mean ± SEM (n = 5 for each group).
P < 0.01,
P < 0.001 vs. lean AL;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01,
P < 0.001 vs. lean CR.
Figure 5Principal component analysis (PCA) of NMR data. Blue circle corresponds to lean rats and red circle corresponds to fa/fa rats. Dark blue dots: lean AL rats; light blue dots: lean CR rats; dark red dots: fa/fa AL rats; light red dots: fa/fa CR rats.