Literature DB >> 1740858

Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries.

G B Hickson1, E W Clayton, P B Githens, F A Sloan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify self-reported reasons that prompt families to file malpractice claims following perinatal injuries.
DESIGN: Families were interviewed by telephone using a questionnaire that contained structured and open-ended questions. PARTICIPANTS: Mothers of infants who had experienced permanent injuries or deaths and had closed malpractice claims in Florida between 1986 and August 1989 were interviewed. Questionnaires were completed by 127 (35%) of a total of 368 such families. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reasons prompting families to file and families' descriptions of medical events, advice from acquaintances, and the quality of physician-family communication.
RESULTS: Families volunteered numerous reasons for filing: advised by knowledgeable acquaintances (33% of respondents), recognized cover-up (24%), needed money (24%), recognized that their child would have no future (23%), needed information (20%), and decided to seek revenge or protect others from harm (19%). Over one third of all families indicated that they were told by medical personnel prior to filing that the care provided had caused their children's injuries. Families expressed dissatisfaction with physician-patient communication. Families believed that physicians would not listen (13% of sample), would not talk openly (32%), attempted to mislead them (48%), or did not warn about long-term neurodevelopmental problems (70%).
CONCLUSION: Families give many reasons for filing a claim. Obtaining money may not be the only goal for some families who file suit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1740858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  62 in total

1.  Medical malpractice among physicians: who will be sued and who will pay?

Authors:  D A Weycker; G A Jensen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-09

2.  Not afraid to blame: the neglected role of blame attribution in medical consumerism and some implications for health policy.

Authors:  Marsha Rosenthal; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Measuring empathy in pharmacy students.

Authors:  Nancy Fjortoft; Lon J Van Winkle; Mohammadreza Hojat
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Medical school attended as a predictor of medical malpractice claims.

Authors:  T M Waters; F V Lefevre; P P Budetti
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10

5.  Malpractice suits and physician apologies in cancer care.

Authors:  Eugene Chung; Jill R Horwitz; John A E Pottow; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  Act first and look up the law afterward?: medical malpractice and the ethics of defensive medicine.

Authors:  K De Ville
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-12

7.  Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship: from evidence and experience.

Authors:  Moira Stewart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Communication gaffes: a root cause of malpractice claims.

Authors:  Beth Huntington; Nettie Kuhn
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-04

9.  "Health courts" and accountability for patient safety.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; David M Studdert; Allen B Kachalia; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  Faculty Development Programming at Academic Medical Centers: Identifying Financial Benefits and Value.

Authors:  David R Topor; David H Roberts
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2016-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.