Literature DB >> 26892420

Diagnostic Strategies for the Evaluation of Chest Pain: Clinical Implications From SCOT-HEART and PROMISE.

Christopher B Fordyce1, David E Newby2, Pamela S Douglas3.   

Abstract

SCOT-HEART (Scottish COmputed Tomography of the HEART) and PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain) represent the 2 largest and most comprehensive cardiovascular imaging outcome trials in patients with stable chest pain and provide significant insights into patient diagnosis, management, and outcomes. These trials are particularly timely, given the well-recognized knowledge gaps and widespread use of noninvasive imaging. The overall goal of this review is to distill the data generated from these 2 pivotal trials to better inform the practicing clinician in the selection of noninvasive testing for stable chest pain. Similarities and differences between SCOT-HEART and PROMISE are highlighted, and clinical and practical implications are discussed. Both trials show that coronary computed tomography angiography should have a greater role in the diagnostic pathway of patients with stable chest pain.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angina pectoris; coronary artery disease; noninvasive cardiac imaging; patient selection

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26892420      PMCID： PMC4771619          DOI： 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN： 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  43 in total

1.  The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial.

Authors:  James A Goldstein; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Aiden Abidov; Stephan Achenbach; Daniel S Berman; Sean W Hayes; Udo Hoffmann; John R Lesser; Issam A Mikati; Brian J O'Neil; Leslee J Shaw; Michael Y H Shen; Uma S Valeti; Gilbert L Raff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Stephen Schroeder; Stephan Achenbach; Frank Bengel; Christof Burgstahler; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim de Feyter; Richard George; Philipp Kaufmann; Andreas F Kopp; Juhani Knuuti; Dieter Ropers; Joanne Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Potential for coronary CT angiography to tailor medical therapy beyond preventive guideline-based recommendations: insights from the ROMICAT I trial.

Authors:  Amit Pursnani; Christopher L Schlett; Thomas Mayrhofer; Csilla Celeng; Pearl Zakroysky; Fabian Bamberg; John T Nagurney; Quynh A Truong; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2015-02-18

4.  CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Harold I Litt; Constantine Gatsonis; Brad Snyder; Harjit Singh; Chadwick D Miller; Daniel W Entrikin; James M Leaming; Laurence J Gavin; Charissa B Pacella; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Coronary artery disease detected by coronary computed tomographic angiography is associated with intensification of preventive medical therapy and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Avinainder Singh; Daniel O'Leary; Mitalee P Christman; Wafa Osmani; Suhny Abbara; Michael L Steigner; Quynh A Truong; Khurram Nasir; Frank F Rybicki; Josh Klein; Jon Hainer; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Rory Hachamovitch; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 6.  Cardiovascular imaging research at the crossroads.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; James K Min; Rory Hachamovitch; Eric D Peterson; Robert C Hendel; Pamela K Woodard; Daniel S Berman; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03

7.  Risk stratification using stress echocardiography: incremental prognostic value over historic, clinical, and stress electrocardiographic variables across a wide spectrum of bayesian pretest probabilities for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Devi Gopinath; Siu-Sun Yao; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization.

Authors:  Christian Layritz; Jasmin Schmid; Stephan Achenbach; Stefan Ulzheimer; Wolfgang Wuest; Matthias May; Dieter Ropers; Lutz Klinghammer; Werner G Daniel; Tobias Pflederer; Michael Lell
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G Mowatt; E Cummins; N Waugh; S Walker; J Cook; X Jia; G S Hillis; C Fraser
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Saul Blecker; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391
View more
  22 in total

1.  Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Christopher B Fordyce; Pamela S Douglas; Rhonda S Roberts; Udo Hoffmann; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Manesh R Patel; Christopher B Granger; John Kostis; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; James E Udelson
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multicenter Study With 48 000 Patient-Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  John F Heitner; Raymond J Kim; Han W Kim; Igor Klem; Dipan J Shah; Dany Debs; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Venkateshwar Polsani; Jiwon Kim; Jonathan Weinsaft; Chetan Shenoy; Andrew Hughes; Preston Cargile; Jean Ho; Robert O Bonow; Elizabeth Jenista; Michele Parker; Robert M Judd
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Integrating FFRCT Into Routine Clinical Practice: A Solid PLATFORM or Slippery Slope?

Authors:  René R Sevag Packard; Ronald P Karlsberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  A phenomapping-derived tool to personalize the selection of anatomical vs. functional testing in evaluating chest pain (ASSIST).

Authors:  Evangelos K Oikonomou; David Van Dijk; Helen Parise; Marc A Suchard; James de Lemos; Charalambos Antoniades; Eric J Velazquez; Edward J Miller; Rohan Khera
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  The prospective randomized trial of the optimal evaluation of cardiac symptoms and revascularization: Rationale and design of the PRECISE trial.

Authors:  Michael G Nanna; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Christopher B Fordyce; Daniel B Mark; Manesh R Patel; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Michelle Kelsey; Beth Martinez; Eric Yow; Sarah Mullen; Gregg W Stone; Ori Ben-Yehuda; James E Udelson; Campbell Rogers; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  George Cm Siontis; Dimitris Mavridis; John P Greenwood; Bernadette Coles; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Peter Jüni; Georgia Salanti; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-02-21

7.  Association of Circulating IGFBP1 Level with the Severity of Coronary Artery Lesions in Patients with Unstable Angina.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Yayu Lai; Peng Jin; Wenzhu Gu; Qi Zhou; Xiaojing Wu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.434

8.  Comparison of International Guidelines for Assessment of Suspected Stable Angina: Insights From the PROMISE and SCOT-HEART.

Authors:  Philip D Adamson; David E Newby; C Larry Hill; Adrian Coles; Pamela S Douglas; Christopher B Fordyce
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-09

9.  Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry.

Authors:  Timothy A Fairbairn; Koen Nieman; Takashi Akasaka; Bjarne L Nørgaard; Daniel S Berman; Gilbert Raff; Lynne M Hurwitz-Koweek; Gianluca Pontone; Tomohiro Kawasaki; Niels Peter Sand; Jesper M Jensen; Tetsuya Amano; Michael Poon; Kristian Øvrehus; Jeroen Sonck; Mark Rabbat; Sarah Mullen; Bernard De Bruyne; Campbell Rogers; Hitoshi Matsuo; Jeroen J Bax; Jonathon Leipsic; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Identification of patients with stable chest pain deriving minimal value from coronary computed tomography angiography: An external validation of the PROMISE minimal-risk tool.

Authors:  Philip D Adamson; Christopher B Fordyce; David A McAllister; James E Udelson; Pamela S Douglas; David E Newby
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.164
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.