Erica Phillips1, Christina Harris2, Wei Wei Lee3, Amber T Pincavage3, Karin Ouchida4, Rachel K Miller5, Saima Chaudhry6, Vineet M Arora3. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. erp2001@med.cornell.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 5. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While there has been increasing emphasis and innovation nationwide in training residents in inpatient handoffs, very little is known about the practice and preparation for year-end clinic handoffs of residency outpatient continuity practices. Thus, the latter remains an identified, yet nationally unaddressed, patient safety concern. OBJECTIVES: The 2014 annual Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (APDIM) survey included seven items for assessing the current year-end clinic handoff practices of internal medicine residency programs throughout the country. DESIGN: Nationwide survey. PARTICIPANTS: All internal medicine program directors registered with APDIM. MAIN MEASURES: Descriptive statistics of programs and tools used to formulate a year-end handoff in the ambulatory setting, methods for evaluating the process, patient safety and quality measures incorporated within the process, and barriers to conducting year-end handoffs. KEY RESULTS: Of the 361 APDIM member programs, 214 (59%) completed the Transitions of Care Year-End Clinic Handoffs section of the survey. Only 34% of respondent programs reported having a year-end ambulatory handoff system, and 4% reported assessing residents for competency in this area. The top three barriers to developing a year-end handoff system were insufficient overlap between graduating and incoming residents, inability to schedule patients with new residents in advance, and time constraints for residents, attendings, and support staff. CONCLUSIONS: Most internal medicine programs do not have a year-end clinic handoff system in place. Greater attention to clinic handoffs and resident assessment of this care transition is needed.
BACKGROUND: While there has been increasing emphasis and innovation nationwide in training residents in inpatient handoffs, very little is known about the practice and preparation for year-end clinic handoffs of residency outpatient continuity practices. Thus, the latter remains an identified, yet nationally unaddressed, patient safety concern. OBJECTIVES: The 2014 annual Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (APDIM) survey included seven items for assessing the current year-end clinic handoff practices of internal medicine residency programs throughout the country. DESIGN: Nationwide survey. PARTICIPANTS: All internal medicine program directors registered with APDIM. MAIN MEASURES: Descriptive statistics of programs and tools used to formulate a year-end handoff in the ambulatory setting, methods for evaluating the process, patient safety and quality measures incorporated within the process, and barriers to conducting year-end handoffs. KEY RESULTS: Of the 361 APDIM member programs, 214 (59%) completed the Transitions of Care Year-End Clinic Handoffs section of the survey. Only 34% of respondent programs reported having a year-end ambulatory handoff system, and 4% reported assessing residents for competency in this area. The top three barriers to developing a year-end handoff system were insufficient overlap between graduating and incoming residents, inability to schedule patients with new residents in advance, and time constraints for residents, attendings, and support staff. CONCLUSIONS: Most internal medicine programs do not have a year-end clinic handoff system in place. Greater attention to clinic handoffs and resident assessment of this care transition is needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
continuity of care; handoff; patient safety; sign-out; transfer of care
Authors: Amber T Pincavage; Shana Ratner; Megan L Prochaska; Meryl Prochaska; Julie Oyler; Andrew M Davis; Vineet M Arora Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Laurie C Caines; Diane M Brockmeyer; Anjala V Tess; Hans Kim; Gila Kriegel; Carol K Bates Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrew S Hwang; Steven J Atlas; Patrick Cronin; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Sachin J Shah; Wei He; Clemens S Hong Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrew Coyle; Ira Helenius; Christina M Cruz; E Allison Lyons; Natalie May; John Andrilli; M Merav Bannet; Rachel Pinotti; David C Thomas Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2019-04
Authors: Cheryl K Zogg; David Metcalfe; Claire M Sokas; Michael K Dalton; Sameer A Hirji; Kimberly A Davis; Adil H Haider; Zara Cooper; Judith H Lichtman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 13.787