Literature DB >> 28197824

In vitro cytotoxicity and surface topography evaluation of additive manufacturing titanium implant materials.

Jukka T Tuomi1, Roy V Björkstrand1, Mikael L Pernu1, Mika V J Salmi1, Eero I Huotilainen1, Jan E H Wolff2, Pekka K Vallittu3, Antti A Mäkitie4,5,6.   

Abstract

Custom-designed patient-specific implants and reconstruction plates are to date commonly manufactured using two different additive manufacturing (AM) technologies: direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) and electron beam melting (EBM). The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the surface structure and to assess the cytotoxicity of titanium alloys processed using DMLS and EBM technologies as the existing information on these issues is scarce. "Processed" and "polished" DMLS and EBM disks were assessed. Microscopic examination revealed titanium alloy particles and surface flaws on the processed materials. These surface flaws were subsequently removed by polishing. Surface roughness of EBM processed titanium was higher than that of DMLS processed. The cytotoxicity results of the DMLS and EBM discs were compared with a "gold standard" commercially available titanium mandible reconstruction plate. The mean cell viability for all discs was 82.6% (range, 77.4 to 89.7) and 83.3% for the control reconstruction plate. The DMLS and EBM manufactured titanium plates were non-cytotoxic both in "processed" and in "polished" forms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28197824     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-017-5863-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  7 in total

1.  A classification of cranial implants based on the degree of difficulty in computer design and manufacture.

Authors:  Jules Poukens; Paul Laeven; Maikel Beerens; Gerard Nijenhuis; Jos Vander Sloten; Paul Stoelinga; Peter Kessler
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.547

2.  Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) of a customized titanium mesh for prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches.

Authors:  L Ciocca; M Fantini; F De Crescenzio; G Corinaldesi; R Scotti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Chemical and physical properties of regenerative medicine materials controlling stem cell fate.

Authors:  Emilia Kaivosoja; Gonçalo Barreto; Kalle Levón; Sannakaisa Virtanen; Mari Ainola; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  Histological and biomechanical analysis of porous additive manufactured implants made by direct metal laser sintering: a pilot study in sheep.

Authors:  Stefan Stübinger; Isabel Mosch; Pierfrancesco Robotti; Michéle Sidler; Karina Klein; Stephen J Ferguson; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  In vitro biocompatibility of titanium alloy discs made using direct metal fabrication.

Authors:  Carla Maria Haslauer; Jessica Collins Springer; Ola L A Harrysson; Elizabeth G Loboa; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere; Denis J Marcellin-Little
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  Biocompatibility of Advanced Manufactured Titanium Implants-A Review.

Authors:  Alfred T Sidambe
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting.

Authors:  Lawrence E Murr; Sara M Gaytan; Edwin Martinez; Frank Medina; Ryan B Wicker
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-08-21
  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Preparation and In Vitro Analysis of Craniofacial Titanium Implants Surfaces Produced by Additive 3D Printing and Conventional Manufacturing.

Authors:  Muhanad M Hatamleh
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-11-05

2.  Effects of Build Orientation on Surface Morphology and Bone Cell Activity of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Specimens.

Authors:  Volker Weißmann; Philipp Drescher; Hermann Seitz; Harald Hansmann; Rainer Bader; Anika Seyfarth; Annett Klinder; Anika Jonitz-Heincke
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs).

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Mona A Montasser; Eman Saad Radwan; Luisa Bernardinelli; Roberto Alcozer; Paola Gandini; Maria Francesca Sfondrini
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Bioartificial Organ Manufacturing Technologies.

Authors:  Xiaohong Wang
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Simulation of Ti-6Al-4V Additive Manufacturing Using Coupled Physically Based Flow Stress and Metallurgical Model.

Authors:  Bijish Babu; Andreas Lundbäck; Lars-Erik Lindgren
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Effect of Shot Peening on the Mechanical Properties and Cytotoxicity Behaviour of Titanium Implants Produced by 3D Printing Technology.

Authors:  Remigiusz Żebrowski; Mariusz Walczak; Agnieszka Korga; Magdalena Iwan; Mirosław Szala
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 7.  Additive Manufacturing Processes in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Mika Salmi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Implementation of Industrial Additive Manufacturing: Intelligent Implants and Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Jan Sher Akmal; Mika Salmi; Antti Mäkitie; Roy Björkstrand; Jouni Partanen
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-06-29

9.  Optimizing 3D Printed Metallic Object's Postprocessing: A Case of Gamma-TiAl Alloys.

Authors:  M A K Chowdhury; Amm Sharif Ullah; Roberto Teti
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.