Literature DB >> 28196405

Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy.

Catherine Chamberlain1,2,3,4, Alison O'Mara-Eves5, Jessie Porter2, Tim Coleman6, Susan M Perlen4, James Thomas5, Joanne E McKenzie3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking remains one of the few preventable factors associated with complications in pregnancy, and has serious long-term implications for women and babies. Smoking in pregnancy is decreasing in high-income countries, but is strongly associated with poverty and is increasing in low- to middle-income countries.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy on smoking behaviour and perinatal health outcomes. SEARCH
METHODS: In this sixth update, we searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (13 November 2015), checked reference lists of retrieved studies and contacted trial authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, cluster-randomised trials, and quasi-randomised controlled trials of psychosocial smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and trial quality, and extracted data. Direct comparisons were conducted in RevMan, with meta-regression conducted in STATA 14. MAIN
RESULTS: The overall quality of evidence was moderate to high, with reductions in confidence due to imprecision and heterogeneity for some outcomes. One hundred and two trials with 120 intervention arms (studies) were included, with 88 trials (involving over 28,000 women) providing data on smoking abstinence in late pregnancy. Interventions were categorised as counselling, health education, feedback, incentives, social support, exercise and dissemination.In separate comparisons, there is high-quality evidence that counselling increased smoking cessation in late pregnancy compared with usual care (30 studies; average risk ratio (RR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 1.73) and less intensive interventions (18 studies; average RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.47). There was uncertainty whether counselling increased the chance of smoking cessation when provided as one component of a broader maternal health intervention or comparing one type of counselling with another. In studies comparing counselling and usual care (largest comparison), it was unclear whether interventions prevented smoking relapse among women who had stopped smoking spontaneously in early pregnancy. However, a clear effect was seen in smoking abstinence at zero to five months postpartum (11 studies; average RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.01) and 12 to 17 months (two studies, average RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.96), with a borderline effect at six to 11 months (six studies; average RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.77). In other comparisons, the effect was unclear for most secondary outcomes, but sample sizes were small.Evidence suggests a borderline effect of health education compared with usual care (five studies; average RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.55), but the quality was downgraded to moderate as the effect was unclear when compared with less intensive interventions (four studies; average RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.70), alternative interventions (one study; RR 1.88, 95% CI 0.19 to 18.60), or when smoking cessation health education was provided as one component of a broader maternal health intervention.There was evidence feedback increased smoking cessation when compared with usual care and provided in conjunction with other strategies, such as counselling (average RR 4.39, 95% CI 1.89 to 10.21), but the confidence in the quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate as this was based on only two studies and the effect was uncertain when feedback was compared to less intensive interventions (three studies; average RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.20).High-quality evidence suggests incentive-based interventions are effective when compared with an alternative (non-contingent incentive) intervention (four studies; RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.09). However pooled effects were not calculable for comparisons with usual care or less intensive interventions (substantial heterogeneity, I2 = 93%).High-quality evidence suggests the effect is unclear in social support interventions provided by peers (six studies; average RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.07), in a single trial of support provided by partners, or when social support for smoking cessation was provided as part of a broader intervention to improve maternal health.The effect was unclear in single interventions of exercise compared to usual care (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.01) and dissemination of counselling (RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.62 to 4.32).Importantly, high-quality evidence from pooled results demonstrated that women who received psychosocial interventions had a 17% reduction in infants born with low birthweight, a significantly higher mean birthweight (mean difference (MD) 55.60 g, 95% CI 29.82 to 81.38 g higher) and a 22% reduction in neonatal intensive care admissions. However the difference in preterm births and stillbirths was unclear. There did not appear to be adverse psychological effects from the interventions.The intensity of support women received in both the intervention and comparison groups has increased over time, with higher-intensity interventions more likely to have higher-intensity comparisons, potentially explaining why no clear differences were seen with increasing intervention intensity in meta-regression analyses. Among meta-regression analyses: studies classified as having 'unclear' implementation and unequal baseline characteristics were less effective than other studies. There was no clear difference between trials implemented by researchers (efficacy studies), and those implemented by routine pregnancy staff (effectiveness studies), however there was uncertainty in the effectiveness of counselling in four dissemination trials where the focus on the intervention was at an organisational level. The pooled effects were similar in interventions provided for women classified as having predominantly low socio-economic status, compared to other women. The effect was significant in interventions among women from ethnic minority groups; however not among indigenous women. There were similar effect sizes in trials with biochemically validated smoking abstinence and those with self-reported abstinence. It was unclear whether incorporating use of self-help manuals or telephone support increased the effectiveness of interventions. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions to support women to stop smoking in pregnancy can increase the proportion of women who stop smoking in late pregnancy and the proportion of infants born low birthweight. Counselling, feedback and incentives appear to be effective, however the characteristics and context of the interventions should be carefully considered. The effect of health education and social support is less clear. New trials have been published during the preparation of this review and will be included in the next update.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28196405      PMCID: PMC6472671          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  2 in total

1.  Clinical trials and tribulations: lessons learned from recruiting pregnant ex-smokers for relapse prevention.

Authors:  Elena N Lopez; Vani Nath Simmons; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cathy D Meade; Thomas N Chirikos; Thomas H Brandon
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Recruitment and retention of low-income minority women in a behavioral intervention to reduce smoking, depression, and intimate partner violence during pregnancy.

Authors:  M Nabil El-Khorazaty; Allan A Johnson; Michele Kiely; Ayman A E El-Mohandes; Siva Subramanian; Haziel A Laryea; Kennan B Murray; Jutta S Thornberry; Jill G Joseph
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total
  113 in total

1.  Are We Justified in Introducing Carbon Monoxide Testing to Encourage Smoking Cessation in Pregnant Women?

Authors:  Catherine Bowden
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2019-06

2.  Biomarker feedback intervention for smoking cessation among Alaska Native pregnant women: Randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Christi A Patten; Kathryn R Koller; Christie A Flanagan; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Christine A Hughes; Abbie W Wolfe; Paul A Decker; Kristin Fruth; Tabetha A Brockman; Molly Korpela; Diana Gamez; Carrie Bronars; Neil J Murphy; Dorothy Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Timothy K Thomas
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-10-12

3.  The interaction of sociodemographic risk factors and measures of nicotine dependence in predicting maternal smoking during pregnancy.

Authors:  Alexandra N Houston-Ludlam; Kathleen K Bucholz; Julia D Grant; Mary Waldron; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 4.  Prenatal risk factors for internalizing and externalizing problems in childhood.

Authors:  Joyce Tien; Gary D Lewis; Jianghong Liu
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.764

5.  Contingency Management Versus Psychotherapy for Prenatal Smoking Cessation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Sarah M Wilson; Amie R Newins; Alyssa M Medenblik; Nathan A Kimbrel; Eric A Dedert; Terrell A Hicks; Lydia C Neal; Jean C Beckham; Patrick S Calhoun
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2018-07-27

6.  Impact of an incentive-based prenatal smoking cessation program for low-income women in Colorado.

Authors:  Kristen J Polinski; Rachel Wolfe; Anne Peterson; Ashley Juhl; Marcelo Coca Perraillon; Arnold H Levinson; Tessa L Crume
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.462

7.  Use of higher-nicotine/tar-yield (regular full-flavor) cigarettes is associated with nicotine dependence and smoking during pregnancy among U.S. women.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Ryan Redner; Christopher A Arger; Allison N Kurti; Jeff S Priest; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Neighborhood affluence protects against antenatal smoking: evidence from a spatial multiple membership model.

Authors:  Jennifer B Kane; Ehsan Farshchi
Journal:  Math Popul Stud       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 0.720

9.  Reducing the Risk of Preterm Birth by Ambulatory Risk Factor Management.

Authors:  Richard Berger; Werner Rath; Harald Abele; Yves Garnier; Ruben-J Kuon; Holger Maul
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  The Healthy Pregnancies Project: Study protocol and baseline characteristics for a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a community intervention to reduce tobacco use among Alaska Native pregnant women.

Authors:  Christi A Patten; Harry A Lando; Chris A Desnoyers; Yvette Barrows; Joseph Klejka; Paul A Decker; Christine A Hughes; Martha J Bock; Rahnia Boyer; Kenneth Resnicow; Linda Burhansstipanov
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.