Literature DB >> 28195707

Influence of Coupling and Embedding Schemes on QM Size Convergence in QM/MM Approaches for the Example of a Proton Transfer in DNA.

Sven Roßbach1,2, Christian Ochsenfeld1,2.   

Abstract

The influence of embedding and coupling schemes on the convergence of the QM size in the QM/MM approach is investigated for the transfer of a proton in a DNA base pair. We find that the embedding scheme (mechanical or electrostatic) has a much greater impact on the convergence behavior than the coupling scheme (additive QM/MM or subtractive ONIOM). To achieve size convergence, QM regions with up to 6000 atoms are necessary for pure QM or mechanical embedding. In contrast, electrostatic embedding converges faster: for the example of the transfer of a proton between DNA base pairs, we recommend including at least five base pairs and 5 Å of solvent (including counterions) into the QM region, i.e., a total of 1150 atoms.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28195707     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  11 in total

1.  Revealing quantum mechanical effects in enzyme catalysis with large-scale electronic structure simulation.

Authors:  Zhongyue Yang; Rimsha Mehmood; Mengyi Wang; Helena W Qi; Adam H Steeves; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  React Chem Eng       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Large-scale QM/MM free energy simulations of enzyme catalysis reveal the influence of charge transfer.

Authors:  Heather J Kulik
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  The influence of base pair tautomerism on single point mutations in aqueous DNA.

Authors:  A Gheorghiu; P V Coveney; A A Arabi
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the "Burning Issues"?

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Tanmoy Pal; Luke Xie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  On the Difference Between Additive and Subtractive QM/MM Calculations.

Authors:  Lili Cao; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 5.221

6.  Do Better Quality Embedding Potentials Accelerate the Convergence of QM/MM Models? The Case of Solvated Acid Clusters.

Authors:  Junming Ho; Yihan Shao; Jin Kato
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  QM/MM study of the binding of H2 to MoCu CO dehydrogenase: development and applications of improved H2 van der Waals parameters.

Authors:  Anna Rovaletti; Claudio Greco; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Can Water Act as a Nucleophile in CO Oxidation Catalysed by Mo/Cu CO-Dehydrogenase? Answers from Theory.

Authors:  Anna Rovaletti; Giorgio Moro; Ugo Cosentino; Ulf Ryde; Claudio Greco
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 9.  The Role of Proton Transfer on Mutations.

Authors:  Ruby Srivastava
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.221

10.  Novel Tautomerisation Mechanisms of the Biologically Important Conformers of the Reverse Löwdin, Hoogsteen, and Reverse Hoogsteen G*·C* DNA Base Pairs via Proton Transfer: A Quantum-Mechanical Survey.

Authors:  Ol'ha O Brovarets'; Timothy A Oliynyk; Dmytro M Hovorun
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.