Literature DB >> 28192639

A deep learning based strategy for identifying and associating mitotic activity with gene expression derived risk categories in estrogen receptor positive breast cancers.

David Romo-Bucheli1, Andrew Janowczyk2, Hannah Gilmore3, Eduardo Romero1, Anant Madabhushi2.   

Abstract

The treatment and management of early stage estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is hindered by the difficulty in identifying patients who require adjuvant chemotherapy in contrast to those that will respond to hormonal therapy. To distinguish between the more and less aggressive breast tumors, which is a fundamental criterion for the selection of an appropriate treatment plan, Oncotype DX (ODX) and other gene expression tests are typically employed. While informative, these gene expression tests are expensive, tissue destructive, and require specialized facilities. Bloom-Richardson (BR) grade, the common scheme employed in breast cancer grading, has been shown to be correlated with the Oncotype DX risk score. Unfortunately, studies have also shown that the BR grade determined experiences notable inter-observer variability. One of the constituent categories in BR grading is the mitotic index. The goal of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL) classifier to identify mitotic figures from whole slides images of ER+ breast cancer, the hypothesis being that the number of mitoses identified by the DL classifier would correlate with the corresponding Oncotype DX risk categories. The mitosis detector yielded an average F-score of 0.556 in the AMIDA mitosis dataset using a 6-fold validation setup. For a cohort of 174 whole slide images with early stage ER+ breast cancer for which the corresponding Oncotype DX score was available, the distributions of the number of mitoses identified by the DL classifier was found to be significantly different between the high vs low Oncotype DX risk groups (P < 0.01). Comparisons of other risk groups, using both ODX score and histological grade, were also found to present significantly different automated mitoses distributions. Additionally, a support vector machine classifier trained to separate low/high Oncotype DX risk categories using the mitotic count determined by the DL classifier yielded a 83.19% classification accuracy.
© 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer risk; digital pathology; mitosis detection; whole slide images

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28192639      PMCID: PMC6124660          DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  17 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer histopathology image analysis: a review.

Authors:  Mitko Veta; Josien P W Pluim; Paul J van Diest; Max A Viergever
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Cell orientation entropy (COrE): predicting biochemical recurrence from prostate cancer tissue microarrays.

Authors:  George Lee; Sahirzeeshan Ali; Robert Veltri; Jonathan I Epstein; Christhunesa Christudass; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

3.  Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index.

Authors:  John S Meyer; Consuelo Alvarez; Clara Milikowski; Neal Olson; Irma Russo; Jose Russo; Andrew Glass; Barbara A Zehnbauer; Karen Lister; Reza Parwaresch
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Comparison of Oncotype DX and Mammostrat risk estimations and correlations with histologic tumor features in low-grade, estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Geza Acs; John Kiluk; Loretta Loftus; Christine Laronga
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images.

Authors:  Mitko Veta; Paul J van Diest; Stefan M Willems; Haibo Wang; Anant Madabhushi; Angel Cruz-Roa; Fabio Gonzalez; Anders B L Larsen; Jacob S Vestergaard; Anders B Dahl; Dan C Cireşan; Jürgen Schmidhuber; Alessandro Giusti; Luca M Gambardella; F Boray Tek; Thomas Walter; Ching-Wei Wang; Satoshi Kondo; Bogdan J Matuszewski; Frederic Precioso; Violet Snell; Josef Kittler; Teofilo E de Campos; Adnan M Khan; Nasir M Rajpoot; Evdokia Arkoumani; Miangela M Lacle; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  A quantitative histomorphometric classifier (QuHbIC) identifies aggressive versus indolent p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  James S Lewis; Sahirzeeshan Ali; Jingqin Luo; Wade L Thorstad; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Mitosis detection in breast cancer histological images An ICPR 2012 contest.

Authors:  Ludovic Roux; Daniel Racoceanu; Nicolas Loménie; Maria Kulikova; Humayun Irshad; Jacques Klossa; Frédérique Capron; Catherine Genestie; Gilles Le Naour; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2013-05-30

8.  The 21-gene recurrence score complements IBTR! Estimates in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-normal, lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil G Thaker; Karen E Hoffman; Michael C Stauder; Simona F Shaitelman; Eric A Strom; Welela Tereffe; Benjamin D Smith; George H Perkins; Lei Huo; Mark F Munsell; Lajos Pusztai; Thomas A Buchholz; Wendy A Woodward
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-01-30

9.  Co-occurring gland angularity in localized subgraphs: predicting biochemical recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  George Lee; Rachel Sparks; Sahirzeeshan Ali; Natalie N C Shih; Michael D Feldman; Elaine Spangler; Timothy Rebbeck; John E Tomaszewski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases.

Authors:  Andrew Janowczyk; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-07-26
View more
  17 in total

1.  Nuclear shape and orientation features from H&E images predict survival in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Cheng Lu; David Romo-Bucheli; Xiangxue Wang; Andrew Janowczyk; Shridar Ganesan; Hannah Gilmore; David Rimm; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.662

2.  Quantitative nuclear histomorphometry predicts oncotype DX risk categories for early stage ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Jon Whitney; German Corredor; Andrew Janowczyk; Shridar Ganesan; Scott Doyle; John Tomaszewski; Michael Feldman; Hannah Gilmore; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Novel Quantitative Imaging for Predicting Response to Therapy: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 4.  Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Jessica Vamathevan; Dominic Clark; Paul Czodrowski; Ian Dunham; Edgardo Ferran; George Lee; Bin Li; Anant Madabhushi; Parantu Shah; Michaela Spitzer; Shanrong Zhao
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Quantitative Nuclear Histomorphometry Predicts Molecular Subtype and Clinical Outcome in Medulloblastomas: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Jon Whitney; Liisa Dollinger; Benita Tamrazi; Debra Hawes; Marta Couce; Julia Marcheque; Alexander Judkins; Ashley Margol; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-02-17

6.  Automatic cellularity assessment from post-treated breast surgical specimens.

Authors:  Mohammad Peikari; Sherine Salama; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Anne L Martel
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Kurt A Schalper; David L Rimm; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Particle swarm optimization-based automatic parameter selection for deep neural networks and its applications in large-scale and high-dimensional data.

Authors:  Fei Ye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High-throughput adaptive sampling for whole-slide histopathology image analysis (HASHI) via convolutional neural networks: Application to invasive breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Angel Cruz-Roa; Hannah Gilmore; Ajay Basavanhally; Michael Feldman; Shridar Ganesan; Natalie Shih; John Tomaszewski; Anant Madabhushi; Fabio González
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Association of Pathological Fibrosis With Renal Survival Using Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Vijaya B Kolachalama; Priyamvada Singh; Christopher Q Lin; Dan Mun; Mostafa E Belghasem; Joel M Henderson; Jean M Francis; David J Salant; Vipul C Chitalia
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2018-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.