| Literature DB >> 28192433 |
Felipe Maurício Soeiro Sampaio1, Bodo Wanke1, Dayvison Francis Saraiva Freitas1, Janice Mery Chicarino de Oliveira Coelho1, Maria Clara Gutierrez Galhardo1, Marcelo Rosandiski Lyra1, Maria Cristina da Silva Lourenço1, Rodrigo de Almeida Paes1, Antonio Carlos Francesconi do Valle1.
Abstract
Mycetoma is caused by the subcutaneous inoculation of filamentous fungi or aerobic filamentous bacteria that form grains in the tissue. The purpose of this study is to describe the epidemiologic, clinic, laboratory, and therapeutic characteristics of patients with mycetoma at the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 1991 and 2014. Twenty-one cases of mycetoma were included in the study. There was a predominance of male patients (1.3:1) and the average patient age was 46 years. The majority of the cases were from the Southeast region of Brazil and the feet were the most affected anatomical region (80.95%). Eumycetoma prevailed over actinomycetoma (61.9% and 38.1% respectively). Eumycetoma patients had positive cultures in 8 of 13 cases, with isolation of Scedosporium apiospermum species complex (n = 3), Madurella mycetomatis (n = 2) and Acremonium spp. (n = 1). Two cases presented sterile mycelium and five were negative. Six of 8 actinomycetoma cases had cultures that were identified as Nocardia spp. (n = 3), Nocardia brasiliensis (n = 2), and Nocardia asteroides (n = 1). Imaging tests were performed on all but one patients, and bone destruction was identified in 9 cases (42.68%). All eumycetoma cases were treated with itraconazole monotherapy or combined with fluconazole, terbinafine, or amphotericin B. Actinomycetoma cases were treated with sulfamethoxazole plus trimethoprim or combined with cycles of amikacin sulphate. Surgical procedures were performed in 9 (69.2%) eumycetoma and in 3 (37.5%) actinomycetoma cases, with one amputation case in each group. Clinical cure occurred in 11 cases (7 for eumycetoma and 4 for actinomycetoma), and recurrence was documented in 4 of 21 cases. No deaths were recorded during the study. Despite of the scarcity of mycetoma in our institution the cases presented reflect the wide clinical spectrum and difficulties to take care of this neglected disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28192433 PMCID: PMC5336304 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Demographic, clinical and laboratorial characteristics of 21 patients diagnosed with mycetoma at the Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro—Brazil, from 1991 to 2014.
| Demographic characteristics | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 57.14 | |
| 9 | 42.85 | |
| 7 | 33.33 | |
| 14 | 66.66 | |
| 15 | 71.42 | |
| 6 | 28.57 | |
| 3 | 14.28 | |
| 9 | 42.85 | |
| 9 | 42.85 | |
| 7 | 33.33 | |
| 3 | 14.28 | |
| 1 | 4.76 | |
| 1 | 4.76 | |
| 11 | 52.38 | |
| 17 | 80.95 | |
| 1 | 4.76 | |
| 1 | 4.76 | |
| 2 | 9.52 | |
| 9 | 42.85 | |
| 12 | 57.14 |
HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.
* Some patients have more than one comorbidity.
Fig 1HIV patient with actinomycetoma before treatment.
Fig 2HIV patient with actinomycetoma after treatment.
Fig 3Foot affected with actinomycetoma.
Fig 4Right foot affected with actinomycetoma and the left foot without disease.
Fig 5Right foot affected with actinomycetoma after treatment.
Main characteristics of 13 patients with Eumycetoma.
| Patient | Sex | Etiologic agent | Grains | Treatment | Time for treatment (months) | Surgery | Bone involvement | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | H | ITZ / AMB | 24 | Yes | Yes | Cure | |
| 2 | M | H/DM | ITZ + FLZ | 60 | Yes | No | Cure | |
| 3 | M | H | ITZ + FLZ | 144 | Yes | Yes | No Cure | |
| 4 | M | H/DM | ITZ | 46 | Yes | No | Cure | |
| 5 | M | H/DM | ITZ + TBF | No | No | |||
| 6 | M | H | ITZ + TBF / ITZ + FLZ | 74 | No | Yes | ||
| 7 | M | Filamentous fungi | H | ITZ | 123 | Yes | No | Cure |
| 8 | F | Filamentous fungi | H/DM | ITZ | No | Yes | ||
| 9 | F | Negative culture | H/DM | ITZ | 24 | Yes | No | Cure |
| 10 | F | Negative culture | H | ITZ | 36 | Yes | Yes | No cure |
| 11 | M | Negative culture | H | ITZ | 7 | Yes | No | Cure |
| 12 | F | Negative culture | H | ITZ | 9 | Yes | No | Cure |
| 13 | M | Negative culture | H | ITZ | 6 | No | No |
F: female; M: male
H: histopathology; DM: direct microscopy; ITZ: itraconazole; FLZ: fluconazole; TBF: terbinafine; AMB: amphotericin B.
*Amputation;
** Abandon of follow up;
*** Still in treatment.
Main characteristics of 8 patients with Actinomycetoma.
| Patient | Sex | Etiologic agente | Grains | Treatment | Time for treatment (months) | Surgery | Bone involvement | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | H | TMP + SMX | 48 | Yes | Yes | ||
| 2 | M | H/ DM | TMP + SMX | 38 | No | Yes | ||
| 3 | F | DM | TMP + SMX | 36 | No | No | Cure | |
| 4 | M | DM | TMP + SMX | 10 | No | No | Cure | |
| 5 | M | H | TMP + SMX | 8 | No | No | ||
| 6 | F | H | TMP + SMX / cefalexin | 19 | Yes | Yes | Cure | |
| 7 | F | Negative culture | H | — | 0 | Yes | No | Cure |
| 8 | F | Negative culture | H | TMP + SMX/ 5 cycles of amikacine | 24 | No | Yes |
F: female; M: male
H: histopathology; DM: direct microscopy; TMP + SMX: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
* Amputation;
** Abandon of follow up;
*** Still in treatment.
Fig 6Radiography showing bone destruction.
Mycetoma cases in Brazil published during 1980–2014.
| Reference | Year | Study | Classification | Number of cases | Etiologic agent | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 1980 | Clinical report + review | unknown | 4 | Unknow | Amazonas (North) |
| [ | 1980 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | - | |
| [ | 1981 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | Minas Gerais (Southeast) | |
| [ | 1981 | Retrospective (1944–1978) | ▪Eumycetoma | 41 113 | ▪Unknown (Histopathological aspects) | Unknow |
| [ | 1982 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 6 | São Paulo (Southeast) | |
| [ | 1982 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | - | |
| [ | 1984 | Clinical report + review | Actinomycetoma | 1 | ▪ | São Paulo (Southeast) |
| [ | 1986 | Case series | Actinomycetoma | 4 | Rio Grande do Sul (South) | |
| [ | 1988 | Retrospective | Unknown | 2 | Unknow | Amazonas (North) |
| [ | 1988 | Clinical report + review | Eumycetoma | 1 | ▪ | Bahia (Northeast) |
| [ | 1988 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | - | |
| [ | 1989 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | - | |
| [ | 1989 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | - | |
| [ | 1990 | Comunication | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Unknow | Ceará (Northeast) |
| [ | 1991 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | Goiás (Midwest) | |
| [ | 1991 | - | - | - | - | Goiânia-Goiás (Midwest) |
| [ | 1992 | Clinical report + review | Actinomycetoma | 2 | ▪ | Rio de Janeiro (Southeast) Pernambuco (Northeast) |
| [ | 1992 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 2 | ▪ | Bahia (Northeast) |
| [ | 1993 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Rio de Janeiro (Southeast) | |
| [ | 1993 | Retrospective 1978–1989 | ▪Eumycetoma | 13 28 | ▪ | Northeast Southeast South |
| [ | 1993 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 2 | Bahia and Piauí(Northeast) | |
| [ | 1994 | Clinical report + review | Actinomycetoma | 1 | ▪ | Pará (North) |
| [ | 1995 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Minas Gerais (Southeast) | |
| [ | 1999 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Unknow | São Paulo (Southeast) |
| [ | 1999 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | Rio Grande do Sul (South) | |
| [ | 1999 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | Bahia (Northeast) | |
| [ | 1999 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | ▪ | Rio Grande do Sul (South) |
| [ | 2002 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | São Paulo (Southeast) | |
| [ | 2004 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Minas Gerais (Southeast) | |
| [ | 2004 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | ▪ | Rondônia (North) |
| [ | 2007 | Case series | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Rio Grande do Sul (South) | |
| [ | 2008 | Retrospective | ▪Eumycetoma | 13 14 | ▪ | Southeast Northeast Southeast Northeast |
| [ | 2010 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Paraíba (Northeast) | |
| [ | 2010 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Minas Gerais (Southeast) | |
| [ | 2011 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 1 | Northeast | |
| [ | 2011 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | - | São Paulo (Southeast) |
| [ | 2011 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | Paraná (South) | |
| [ | 2013 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | Ceará (Northeast) | |
| [ | 2013 | Clinical report + review | Eumycetoma | 1 | Rio Grande do Sul (Southeast) | |
| [ | 2014 | Clinical report | Actinomycetoma | 1 | São Paulo (Southeast) | |
| [ | 2014 | Clinical report | Eumycetoma | 1 | Rio de Janeiro (Southeast) |
* Article with reference but not found.
** Article with doubt about the diagnostic proposed by the author because he has not reported the existence of grain.
*** Case report inside the study.
**** Review of the author.