Ashley M Kopec1, Phillip D Rivera2, Michael J Lacagnina3, Richa Hanamsagar2, Staci D Bilbo2. 1. Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: akopec@partners.org. 2. Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Techniques simultaneously assessing multiple levels of molecular processing are appealing because molecular signaling underlying complex neural phenomena occurs at complementary levels. The TRIzol method isolates RNA and DNA, but protein retrieval is difficult due to inefficient solubilization of precipitated protein pellets. NEW METHOD: We optimized a buffer for the efficient solubilization of protein from TRIzol-precipitated brain tissue for Western blotting analysis, which was also more effective at directly homogenizing brain tissue than RIPA buffer. RESULTS: Protein yield during solubilization, in addition to protein yield via direct homogenization, is increased by optimizing concentrations of chemicals in a standard lysis buffer. Effective incubation parameters for both total protein yield and the analysis of post-translational modifications is remarkably flexible. Importantly, different neural cell types and protein classes are represented in solubilized protein samples. Moreover, we used dissociated mouse brain tissue to isolate microglia from other cell types and successfully resolved cell type-specific proteins from these small and difficult to attain samples. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Solubilization buffers to date have been comprised primarily of SDS or urea; the data herein demonstrate that components common to lysis buffers can also enhance protein solubilization both after direct homogenization and after precipitation. CONCLUSIONS: This method is suitable for assessing gene and protein expression from a single brain sample, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of neural phenomena while minimizing the number of subjects.
BACKGROUND: Techniques simultaneously assessing multiple levels of molecular processing are appealing because molecular signaling underlying complex neural phenomena occurs at complementary levels. The TRIzol method isolates RNA and DNA, but protein retrieval is difficult due to inefficient solubilization of precipitated protein pellets. NEW METHOD: We optimized a buffer for the efficient solubilization of protein from TRIzol-precipitated brain tissue for Western blotting analysis, which was also more effective at directly homogenizing brain tissue than RIPA buffer. RESULTS: Protein yield during solubilization, in addition to protein yield via direct homogenization, is increased by optimizing concentrations of chemicals in a standard lysis buffer. Effective incubation parameters for both total protein yield and the analysis of post-translational modifications is remarkably flexible. Importantly, different neural cell types and protein classes are represented in solubilized protein samples. Moreover, we used dissociated mouse brain tissue to isolate microglia from other cell types and successfully resolved cell type-specific proteins from these small and difficult to attain samples. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Solubilization buffers to date have been comprised primarily of SDS or urea; the data herein demonstrate that components common to lysis buffers can also enhance protein solubilization both after direct homogenization and after precipitation. CONCLUSIONS: This method is suitable for assessing gene and protein expression from a single brain sample, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of neural phenomena while minimizing the number of subjects.
Authors: Kell K Andersen; Cristiano L Oliveira; Kim L Larsen; Flemming M Poulsen; Thomas H Callisen; Peter Westh; Jan S Pedersen; Daniel Otzen Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Andrey P Tikunov; Jeremiah D Tipton; Timothy J Garrett; Sachi V Shinde; Hong Jin Kim; David A Gerber; Laura E Herring; Lee M Graves; Jeffrey M Macdonald Journal: Methods Mol Biol Date: 2022
Authors: Roberto Simone; Faiza Javad; Warren Emmett; Oscar G Wilkins; Filipa Lourenço Almeida; Natalia Barahona-Torres; Justyna Zareba-Paslawska; Mazdak Ehteramyan; Paola Zuccotti; Angelika Modelska; Kavitha Siva; Gurvir S Virdi; Jamie S Mitchell; Jasmine Harley; Victoria A Kay; Geshanthi Hondhamuni; Daniah Trabzuni; Mina Ryten; Selina Wray; Elisavet Preza; Demis A Kia; Alan Pittman; Raffaele Ferrari; Claudia Manzoni; Andrew Lees; John A Hardy; Michela A Denti; Alessandro Quattrone; Rickie Patani; Per Svenningsson; Thomas T Warner; Vincent Plagnol; Jernej Ule; Rohan de Silva Journal: Nature Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lajos V Kemény; Kathleen C Robinson; Andrea L Hermann; Deena M Walker; Susan Regan; Yik Weng Yew; Yi Chun Lai; Nicholas Theodosakis; Phillip D Rivera; Weihua Ding; Liuyue Yang; Tobias Beyer; Yong-Hwee E Loh; Jennifer A Lo; Anita A J van der Sande; William Sarnie; David Kotler; Jennifer J Hsiao; Mack Y Su; Shinichiro Kato; Joseph Kotler; Staci D Bilbo; Vanita Chopra; Matthew P Salomon; Shiqian Shen; Dave S B Hoon; Maryam M Asgari; Sarah E Wakeman; Eric J Nestler; David E Fisher Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 14.957
Authors: Michael J Lacagnina; Ashley M Kopec; Stewart S Cox; Richa Hanamsagar; Corinne Wells; Susan Slade; Peter M Grace; Linda R Watkins; Edward D Levin; Staci D Bilbo Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jane I Khudyakov; Jared S Deyarmin; Ryan M Hekman; Laura Pujade Busqueta; Rasool Maan; Melony J Mody; Reeti Banerjee; Daniel E Crocker; Cory D Champagne Journal: Biol Open Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 2.422
Authors: Markus Krohn; Thomas Wanek; Marie-Claude Menet; Andreas Noack; Xavier Declèves; Oliver Langer; Wolfgang Löscher; Jens Pahnke Journal: Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) Date: 2018-07-06