Literature DB >> 28190212

Outcomes of medical malpractice claims in assisted reproductive technology over a 10-year period from a single carrier.

Gerard Letterie1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medical malpractice claims vary by specialty. Contributory factors to malpractice in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) are not well defined. We sought to determine claims' frequency, basis of claims, and outcomes of settled claims in REI.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective, descriptive review of 10 years of claims.
SETTING: The setting is private practices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Claims were monitored within one malpractice carrier between 2006 and 2015 covering 10 practices and 184,015 IVF cycles. Total claims, basis of claims, and indemnity paid were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were 176 incidents resulting in 30 settled claims with indemnity payments in 21. Categories of claims settled included misdiagnosis (N = 4), lack of informed consent (N = 5), embryology errors (N = 8), and surgical complications (N = 4). Total and average awards were $15,062,000 and $717,238, respectively. Misdiagnosis and lack of informed consent had highest total award amount at $11,583,000 accounting for 76% of award dollars. The two highest awards were $4.5 million and $3.0 million for cancer and genetic misdiagnosis, respectively. Excluding these two awards, payments totaled $7,562,000, ranged from $6000 to $900,000 and averaged $170,363. Errors in handling of embryos were highest in frequency accounting for 38% of claims paid for a total of $1,593,000 with average payment of $199,188. Settlements for surgical complications totaled $1,855,000 and averaged $463,750 per claim.
CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis and lack of informed consent are the highest award categories. Embryology lab errors are the most frequent causes of claims with the lowest award per settlement. The average cost for claims settled is relatively high compared to settlements in other specialties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Claim settlements; Medical error; Medical malpractice; Misdiagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28190212      PMCID: PMC5401702          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0889-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  17 in total

1.  Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; Atul A Gawande; Tejal K Gandhi; Allen Kachalia; Catherine Yoon; Ann Louise Puopolo; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation.

Authors:  T A Brennan; C M Sox; H R Burstin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Medical error reduction and tort reform through private, contractually-based quality medicine societies.

Authors:  Duncan MacCourt; Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2009

4.  Application of root cause analysis on malpractice claim files related to diagnostic failures.

Authors:  I van Noord; M P Eikens; A M Hamersma; M C de Bruijne
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-07-14

5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a systematic review of litigation in the face of new technology.

Authors:  Tochi Amagwula; Peter L Chang; Amjad Hossain; Joey Tyner; Aimée L Rivers; John Y Phelps
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986-2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank.

Authors:  Ali S Saber Tehrani; HeeWon Lee; Simon C Mathews; Andrew Shore; Martin A Makary; Peter J Pronovost; David E Newman-Toker
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; J E Rolph; K McGuigan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Classifying health information technology patient safety related incidents - an approach used in Wales.

Authors:  D Warm; P Edwards
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Quality review of an adverse incident reporting system and root cause analysis of serious adverse surgical incidents in a teaching hospital of Scotland.

Authors:  Maziar Khorsandi; Christos Skouras; Kevin Beatson; Afshin Alijani
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2012-08-29

10.  Negligence, genuine error, and litigation.

Authors:  David H Sohn
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2013-02-15
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Liability for embryo mix-ups in fertility practices in the USA.

Authors:  Melody A Rasouli; Christopher P Moutos; John Y Phelps
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Lawsuit frequency and claims basis over lost, damaged, and destroyed frozen embryos over a 10-year period.

Authors:  Gerard Letterie; Dov Fox
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-07-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.