Literature DB >> 1920696

Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties.

R L Kravitz1, J E Rolph, K McGuigan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: --To identify potentially preventable sources of medical injury in obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, anesthesiology, and radiology.
DESIGN: --Retrospective review of physician malpractice claim records.
SETTING: --Large New Jersey physician malpractice insurer. PARTICIPANTS: --Physicians practicing obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, anesthesiology, and radiology and covered by the insurance carrier during any portion of 1977 through 1989. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: --Proportion of claims due to negligence associated with errors in (1) patient management, (2) technical performance, and (3) medical and nursing staff coordination and the clinical and financial consequences of such errors.
RESULTS: --Among 1371 claims ascribed to negligence, patient management errors were cited most frequently in all four specialties (48% to 75%) and, compared with performance and coordination problems, were generally associated with a higher frequency of serious injury and higher median payments. Coordination problems accounted for about 9% of claims. In obstetrics and gynecology, newborn delivery claims usually arose from management errors (57% to 68%), whereas gynecologic procedure claims were most often associated with performance errors (55% to 73%). Underperformance of cesarean section was cited more frequently than overperformance (31% vs 3%). General surgery claims were about equally divided between management and performance types regardless of procedure. Failure to perform appropriate diagnostic testing or monitoring was the main problem in 3% to 8% of claims.
CONCLUSION: --Malpractice data can be used to identify problem-prone clinical processes and suggest interventions that may reduce negligence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1920696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  10 in total

1.  Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States.

Authors:  R L Phillips; L A Bartholomew; S M Dovey; G E Fryer; T J Miyoshi; L A Green
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

2.  The importance of negative defensive medicine in the effects of malpractice reform.

Authors:  Daniel Montanera
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-09

3.  Characteristics of surgeons with high and low malpractice claims rates.

Authors:  T E Adamson; D C Baldwin; T J Sheehan; A A Oppenberg
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-01

4.  Outcomes of medical malpractice claims in assisted reproductive technology over a 10-year period from a single carrier.

Authors:  Gerard Letterie
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  What can patients do to improve health care?

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Richard Grol
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Patient safety and telephone medicine : some lessons from closed claim case review.

Authors:  Harvey P Katz; Dawn Kaltsounis; Liz Halloran; Maureen Mondor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A descriptive study of medical malpractice cases in Turkey.

Authors:  Umit N Gundogmus; Mehmet S Erdogan; Mine Sehiralti; Omer Kurtas
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  Intraoperative injuries from abdominopelvic surgery: an analysis of national medicolegal data.

Authors:  Guylaine Lefebvre; Kirsten A Devenny; Diane L Héroux; Cara L Bowman; Heather K Neilson; Richard Mimeault; Sukhbir S Singh; Lisa A Calder
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Cesarean sections and social inequalities in 305 cities of Latin America.

Authors:  Mónica Serena Perner; Ana Ortigoza; Andrés Trotta; Goro Yamada; Ariela Braverman Bronstein; Amélia Augusta Friche; Marcio Alazraqui; Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-09-27

10.  Improving communication between obstetric and neonatology teams for high-risk deliveries: a quality improvement project.

Authors:  Nathan C Sundgren; Frances C Kelly; Emily M Weber; Merle L Moore; Ganga Gokulakrishnan; Joseph L Hagan; M Colleen Brand; Jennifer O Gallegos; Barbara E Levy; Regine M Fortunov
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2017-12-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.