Literature DB >> 28189608

Group prenatal care.

Sara E Mazzoni1, Ebony B Carter2.   

Abstract

Patients participating in group prenatal care gather together with women of similar gestational ages and 2 providers who cofacilitate an educational session after a brief medical assessment. The model was first described in the 1990s by a midwife for low-risk patients and is now practiced by midwives and physicians for both low-risk patients and some high-risk patients, such as those with diabetes. The majority of literature on group prenatal care uses CenteringPregnancy, the most popular model. The first randomized controlled trial of CenteringPregnancy showed that it reduced the risk of preterm birth in low-risk women. However, recent meta-analyses have shown similar rates of preterm birth, low birthweight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission between women participating in group prenatal care and individual prenatal care. There may be subgroups, such as African Americans, who benefit from this type of prenatal care with significantly lower rates of preterm birth. Group prenatal care seems to result in increased patient satisfaction and knowledge and use of postpartum family planning as well as improved weight gain parameters. The literature is inconclusive regarding breast-feeding, stress, depression, and positive health behaviors, although it is theorized that group prenatal care positively affects these outcomes. It is unclear whether group prenatal care results in cost savings, although it may in large-volume practices if each group consists of approximately 8-10 women. Group prenatal care requires a significant paradigm shift. It can be difficult to implement and sustain. More randomized trials are needed to ascertain the true benefits of the model, best practices for implementation, and subgroups who may benefit most from this innovative way to provide prenatal care. In short, group prenatal care is an innovative and promising model with comparable pregnancy outcomes to individual prenatal care in the general population and improved outcomes in some demographic groups.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CenteringPregnancy; group prenatal care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28189608     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric Group Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emily Gaskin; Kim Weber Yorga; Rebecca Berman; Mandy Allison; Jeanelle Sheeder
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-05-07

2.  Assessing the impact of group antenatal care on gestational length in Rwanda: A cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Felix Sayinzoga; Tiffany Lundeen; Sabine F Musange; Elizabeth Butrick; David Nzeyimana; Nathalie Murindahabi; Hana Azman-Firdaus; Nancy L Sloan; Alejandra Benitez; Beth Phillips; Rakesh Ghosh; Dilys Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impact of Group Prenatal Care on Contraceptive Use at Twelve Weeks Postpartum.

Authors:  Aishat Olatunde; Safiyah Hosein; Andrew Paoletti; Alexis Pitcairn-Ramirez; Elizabeth P Gurney
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-02-25

4.  Not just a number: examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Lenka Benova; Özge Tunçalp; Allisyn C Moran; Oona Maeve Renee Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-04-12

5.  Evaluating process fidelity during the implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Mexico.

Authors:  Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera; Ileana Heredia-Pi; Zafiro Andrade-Romo; Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal; Lourdes Bravo; Laurie Jurkiewicz; Blair G Darney
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The Mexican Experience Adapting CenteringPregnancy: Lessons Learned in a Publicly Funded Health Care System Serving Vulnerable Women.

Authors:  Ileana B Heredia-Pi; Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera; Zafiro Andrade-Romo; María de Lourdes Bravo Bolaños Cacho; Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal; Laurie Jurkiewicz; Blair G Darney
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Association of Delivery Outcomes With the Number of Childbirth Education Sessions.

Authors:  Jennifer Vanderlaan; Christen Sadler; Kristen Kjerulff
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep 01       Impact factor: 1.638

8.  Occurrence of fatal police violence during pregnancy and hazard of preterm birth in California.

Authors:  Dana E Goin; Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Kriszta Farkas; Catherine Duarte; Deborah Karasek; Brittany D Chambers; Andrea V Jackson; Jennifer Ahern
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.103

9.  Patient Preferences for Prenatal and Postpartum Care Delivery: A Survey of Postpartum Women.

Authors:  Alex Friedman Peahl; Alli Novara; Michele Heisler; Vanessa K Dalton; Michelle H Moniz; Roger D Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Use of a Facilitated Group Process to Design and Implement a Group Antenatal and Postnatal Care Program in Rwanda.

Authors:  Felix Sayinzoga; Tiffany Lundeen; Mathias Gakwerere; Emmanuel Manzi; Yvonne Delphine U Nsaba; M Providence Umuziga; Ina R Kalisa; Sabine F Musange; Dilys Walker
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.