Literature DB >> 28189309

Agroforestry versus farm mosaic systems - Comparing land-use efficiency, economic returns and risks under climate change effects.

Carola Paul1, Michael Weber2, Thomas Knoke3.   

Abstract

Increasing land-use conflicts call for the development of land-use systems that reconcile agricultural production with the provisioning of multiple ecosystem services, including climate change mitigation. Agroforestry has been suggested as a global solution to increase land-use efficiency, while reducing environmental impacts and economic risks for farmers. Past research has often focused on comparing tree-crop combinations with agricultural monocultures, but agroforestry has seldom been systematically compared to other forms of land-use diversification, including a farm mosaic. This form of diversification mixes separate parcels of different land uses within the farm. The objective of this study was to develop a modelling approach to compare the performance of the agroforestry and farm mosaic diversification strategies, accounting for tree-crop interaction effects and economic and climate uncertainty. For this purpose, Modern Portfolio Theory and risk simulation were coupled with the process-based biophysical simulation model WaNuLCAS 4.0. For an example application, we used data from a field trial in Panama. The results show that the simulated agroforestry systems (Taungya, alley cropping and border planting) could outperform a farm mosaic approach in terms of cumulative production and return. Considering market and climate uncertainty, agroforestry showed an up to 21% higher economic return at the same risk level (i.e. standard deviation of economic returns). Farm compositions with large shares of land allocated to maize cultivation were also more severely affected by an increasing drought frequency in terms of both risks and returns. Our study demonstrates that agroforestry can be an economically efficient diversification strategy, but only if the design allows for economies of scope, beneficial interactions between trees and crops and higher income diversification compared to a farm mosaic. The modelling approach can make an important contribution to support land-use decisions at the farm level and reduce land-use conflicts at the landscape level.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change; Ecosystem services; Land Equivalent Ratio; Land-use diversification; Portfolio theory; WaNuLCAS

Year:  2017        PMID: 28189309     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Modelling Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) in response to climate change scenarios for the SAARC nations.

Authors:  Ram Kumar Singh; Vinay Shankar Prasad Sinha; Pawan Kumar Joshi; Manoj Kumar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges.

Authors:  Nathalie Seddon; Alexandre Chausson; Pam Berry; Cécile A J Girardin; Alison Smith; Beth Turner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Which Socio-economic Conditions Drive the Selection of Agroforestry at the Forest Frontier?

Authors:  Elizabeth Gosling; Thomas Knoke; Esther Reith; Alyna Reyes Cáceres; Carola Paul
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Integrated agroforestry systems improve soil carbon storage, water productivity, and economic returns in the marginal land of the semi-arid region.

Authors:  Sanjay Singh Rathore; Subhash Babu; Ahmed H El-Sappah; Kapila Shekhawat; Vinod K Singh; Rajiv K Singh; P K Upadhyay; Raghavendra Singh
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.052

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.