Yingning Wang1, Hai-Yen Sung1, Tingting Yao1, James Lightwood2, Wendy Max1. 1. Institute for Health and Aging, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
Introduction: The proportion of smokers who do not smoke daily has increased over time, but nondaily smokers are a heterogeneous group. We compare characteristics and other tobacco product use of infrequent nondaily, frequent nondaily, and daily US adult smokers. Methods: We analyzed data from the 1998, 2000, 2005, and 2010 National Health Interview Surveys. Current smokers were categorized as daily, infrequent nondaily (smoked 1-12 days in the past 30 days), and frequent nondaily (smoked 13-29 days in the past 30 days) smokers. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the correlates of infrequent nondaily, frequent nondaily, and daily smoking. Results: Among current smokers, 8.3% were infrequent nondaily, 8.1% were frequent nondaily, and 83.6% were daily smokers. The prevalence of infrequent versus daily smoking increased over time, with a smaller increase among non-Hispanic Blacks than non-Hispanic Whites. The adjusted odds of both infrequent and frequent smoking versus daily smoking differed by age, race/ethnicity, education, poverty status, marital status, region, quit attempts in the past 12 months, and binge drinking. Snuff users (vs. non-snuff users) were 2.4 times as likely to be infrequent than daily smokers. There were also differences in race/ethnicity, education, marital status, region, quit attempts, and snuff use between infrequent versus frequent smokers. Conclusion: Infrequent smokers differ from both frequent and daily smokers in socio-demographics, quit attempts, and snuff use. The heterogeneity of nondaily smokers should be considered in developing targeted tobacco control and smoking cessation programs. Implications: Infrequent and frequent nondaily smokers were found to differ from daily smokers in age, race/ethnicity, education, poverty status, marital status, region, and quit attempts and they were different from each other in race/ethnicity, education, marital status, region, and quit attempts. Binge drinkers were more likely to be infrequent smokers and frequent smokers versus daily smokers. Current snuff users were found to have increased odds of infrequent smoking versus daily smoking and versus frequent smoking. These results highlight the importance of acknowledging the differences among nondaily smokers in smoking frequency in developing targeted tobacco control and smoking cessation programs.
Introduction: The proportion of smokers who do not smoke daily has increased over time, but nondaily smokers are a heterogeneous group. We compare characteristics and other tobacco product use of infrequent nondaily, frequent nondaily, and daily US adult smokers. Methods: We analyzed data from the 1998, 2000, 2005, and 2010 National Health Interview Surveys. Current smokers were categorized as daily, infrequent nondaily (smoked 1-12 days in the past 30 days), and frequent nondaily (smoked 13-29 days in the past 30 days) smokers. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the correlates of infrequent nondaily, frequent nondaily, and daily smoking. Results: Among current smokers, 8.3% were infrequent nondaily, 8.1% were frequent nondaily, and 83.6% were daily smokers. The prevalence of infrequent versus daily smoking increased over time, with a smaller increase among non-Hispanic Blacks than non-Hispanic Whites. The adjusted odds of both infrequent and frequent smoking versus daily smoking differed by age, race/ethnicity, education, poverty status, marital status, region, quit attempts in the past 12 months, and binge drinking. Snuff users (vs. non-snuff users) were 2.4 times as likely to be infrequent than daily smokers. There were also differences in race/ethnicity, education, marital status, region, quit attempts, and snuff use between infrequent versus frequent smokers. Conclusion: Infrequent smokers differ from both frequent and daily smokers in socio-demographics, quit attempts, and snuff use. The heterogeneity of nondaily smokers should be considered in developing targeted tobacco control and smoking cessation programs. Implications: Infrequent and frequent nondaily smokers were found to differ from daily smokers in age, race/ethnicity, education, poverty status, marital status, region, and quit attempts and they were different from each other in race/ethnicity, education, marital status, region, and quit attempts. Binge drinkers were more likely to be infrequent smokers and frequent smokers versus daily smokers. Current snuff users were found to have increased odds of infrequent smoking versus daily smoking and versus frequent smoking. These results highlight the importance of acknowledging the differences among nondaily smokers in smoking frequency in developing targeted tobacco control and smoking cessation programs.
Authors: Kolawole S Okuyemi; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Rachel Banks; Kari Jo Harris; Michael C Mosier; Niaman Nazir; Joshua Powell Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2004 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Hamed Rezaishiraz; Joseph Bauer; Gary A Giovino; K Michael Cummings Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Erin L Sutfin; Thomas P McCoy; Carla J Berg; Heather Champion; Donald W Helme; Mary Claire O'Brien; Mark Wolfson Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2012-03
Authors: Dina N K Boulos; Christopher A Loffredo; Maged El Setouhy; Fatma Abdel-Aziz; Ebenezer Israel; Mostafa K Mohamed Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Edward Sutanto; Connor Miller; Danielle M Smith; Ron Borland; Andrew Hyland; K Michael Cummings; Anne C K Quah; Steve Shaowei Xu; Geoffrey T Fong; Janine Ouimet; Itsuro Yoshimi; Yumiko Mochizuki; Takahiro Tabuchi; Richard J O'Connor; Maciej L Goniewicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Luz María Sánchez-Romero; Christopher J Cadham; Jana L Hirschtick; Delvon T Mattingly; Beomyoung Cho; Nancy L Fleischer; Andrew Brouwer; Ritesh Mistry; Stephanie R Land; Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza; David T Levy Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 3.295