Literature DB >> 28183511

Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: An Academic Research Consortium Initiative.

Alexandra J Lansky1, Steven R Messé2, Adam M Brickman3, Michael Dwyer4, H Bart van der Worp5, Ronald M Lazar3, Cody G Pietras6, Kevin J Abrams7, Eugene McFadden8, Nils H Petersen9, Jeffrey Browndyke10, Bernard Prendergast11, Vivian G Ng6, Donald E Cutlip12, Samir Kapadia13, Mitchell W Krucoff14, Axel Linke15, Claudia Scala Moy16, Joachim Schofer17, Gerrit-Anne van Es18, Renu Virmani19, Jeffrey Popma20, Michael K Parides20, Susheel Kodali21, Michel Bilello22, Robert Zivadinov4, Joseph Akar23, Karen L Furie24, Daryl Gress25, Szilard Voros26, Jeffrey Moses21, David Greer9, John K Forrest23, David Holmes27, Arie P Kappetein28, Michael Mack29, Andreas Baumbach30.   

Abstract

Surgical and catheter-based cardiovascular procedures and adjunctive pharmacology have an inherent risk of neurological complications. The current diversity of neurological endpoint definitions and ascertainment methods in clinical trials has led to uncertainties in the neurological risk attributable to cardiovascular procedures and inconsistent evaluation of therapies intended to prevent or mitigate neurological injury. Benefit-risk assessment of such procedures should be on the basis of an evaluation of well-defined neurological outcomes that are ascertained with consistent methods and capture the full spectrum of neurovascular injury and its clinical effect. The Neurologic Academic Research Consortium is an international collaboration intended to establish consensus on the definition, classification, and assessment of neurological endpoints applicable to clinical trials of a broad range of cardiovascular interventions. Systematic application of the proposed definitions and assessments will improve our ability to evaluate the risks of cardiovascular procedures and the safety and effectiveness of preventive therapies.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular; methodology; neurological definitions; outcomes; stroke; trials

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28183511     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   27.203


  19 in total

1.  Understanding Neurologic Complications Following TAVR.

Authors:  Ghare Mohammed Imran; Lansky Alexandra
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-01

2.  Effect of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices on CNS Infarction in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Michael J Mack; Michael A Acker; Annetine C Gelijns; Jessica R Overbey; Michael K Parides; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Mark A Groh; Alan J Moskowitz; Neal O Jeffries; Gorav Ailawadi; Vinod H Thourani; Ellen G Moquete; Alexander Iribarne; Pierre Voisine; Louis P Perrault; Michael E Bowdish; Michel Bilello; Christos Davatzikos; Ralph F Mangusan; Rachelle A Winkle; Peter K Smith; Robert E Michler; Marissa A Miller; Karen L O'Sullivan; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Eric A Rose; Richard D Weisel; Karen L Furie; Emilia Bagiella; Claudia Scala Moy; Patrick T O'Gara; Steven R Messé
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Comparison of Post-operative Outcomes Between Direct Axillary Artery Cannulation and Side-Graft Axillary Artery Cannulation in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yi Xie; Yu Liu; Peng Yang; Chen Lu; Jia Hu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Cerebral protection devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a clinical meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Narrative review on endovascular techniques for left subclavian artery revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair and risk factors for postoperative stroke.

Authors:  Mario D'Oria; Kevin Mani; Randall DeMartino; Martin Czerny; Konstantinos P Donas; Anders Wanhainen; Sandro Lepidi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 6.  Cerebral Embolic Protection in TAVI: Friend or Foe.

Authors:  Michael Teitelbaum; Rafail A Kotronias; Luciano A Sposato; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-02

7.  Rationale and design of the ADAPT-TAVR trial: a randomised comparison of edoxaban and dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of leaflet thrombosis and cerebral embolisation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hanbit Park; Do-Yoon Kang; Jung-Min Ahn; Kyung Won Kim; Anthony Y T Wong; Simon C C Lam; Wei-Hsian Yin; Jeng Wei; Yung-Tsai Lee; Hsien-Li Kao; Mao-Shin Lin; Tsung-Yu Ko; Won-Jang Kim; Se Hun Kang; Euihong Ko; Dae-Hee Kim; Hyun Jung Koo; Dong Hyun Yang; Joon-Won Kang; Seung Chai Jung; Jae-Hong Lee; Sung-Cheol Yun; Seung-Jung Park; Duk-Woo Park
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  TAVR: A Review of Current Practices and Considerations in Low-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Jenna Spears; Yousif Al-Saiegh; David Goldberg; Sina Manthey; Sheldon Goldberg
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Cerebral Protection Devices during Transcatheter Interventions: Indications, Benefits, and Limitations.

Authors:  Stephan Haussig; Axel Linke; Norman Mangner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Cerebrovascular Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  German Armijo; Luis Nombela-Franco; Gabriela Tirado-Conte
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.