| Literature DB >> 28182555 |
Jorge Bernal, Nima Tajkbaksh, Francisco Javier Sanchez, Bogdan J Matuszewski, Quentin Angermann, Olivier Romain, Bjorn Rustad, Ilangko Balasingham, Konstantin Pogorelov, Quentin Debard, Lena Maier-Hein, Stefanie Speidel, Danail Stoyanov, Patrick Brandao, Henry Cordova, Cristina Sanchez-Montes, Suryakanth R Gurudu, Gloria Fernandez-Esparrach, Xavier Dray, Aymeric Histace.
Abstract
Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colon cancer screening though some polyps are still missed, thus preventing early disease detection and treatment. Several computational systems have been proposed to assist polyp detection during colonoscopy but so far without consistent evaluation. The lack of publicly available annotated databases has made it difficult to compare methods and to assess if they achieve performance levels acceptable for clinical use. The Automatic Polyp Detection sub-challenge, conducted as part of the Endoscopic Vision Challenge (http://endovis.grand-challenge.org) at the international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2015, was an effort to address this need. In this paper, we report the results of this comparative evaluation of polyp detection methods, as well as describe additional experiments to further explore differences between methods. We define performance metrics and provide evaluation databases that allow comparison of multiple methodologies. Results show that convolutional neural networks are the state of the art. Nevertheless, it is also demonstrated that combining different methodologies can lead to an improved overall performance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28182555 DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging ISSN: 0278-0062 Impact factor: 10.048