Literature DB >> 28181055

Endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography improves immediate postoperative outcome: a case-control study in off-pump coronary surgery.

Thomas Leclercq1, Marc Lilot2, Thomas Schulz2, Alexandre Meyer2, Fadi Farhat3, Jean-Luc Fellahi2,4.   

Abstract

The feasibility and clinical utility of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor (ECOM) to optimize intraoperative hemodynamics and improve short-term outcome in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is unknown. We aimed to compare ECOM with a standard of care in that specific surgical setting. Twenty consecutive adult ECOM-monitored patients undergoing OPCAB were prospectively included (ECOM group) and retrospectively compared to 42 patients scheduled for similar surgery without ECOM monitoring (Control group). The primary endpoint was the global rate of postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary endpoints were the time to extubation, the length of stay in ICU and in hospital, the postoperative levels of lactate and troponin and the feasibility of ECOM. The rate of postoperative admission to the ICU was 38/42 (90%) in the Control group versus 11/20 (55%) in the ECOM group, P = 0.008. None unexpected admission for hemodynamic instability was observed in the ECOM group. The time to extubation, the length of stay in ICU, and both troponin level at admission and lactate level at H6 were all significantly decreased in the ECOM group. On a scale ranging from 0 to 5, convenience and satisfaction regarding ECOM were 4.30 ± 1.17 and 3.45 ± 0.68, respectively. The systematic use of ECOM is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of admission to the ICU and an improvement in immediate outcome in OPCAB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac surgery; Endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography; Hemodynamic monitoring; Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28181055     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-9996-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  24 in total

Review 1.  The current status of off-pump coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  Julie Huffmyer; Jacob Raphael
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.706

2.  Endotracheal cardiac output monitor.

Authors:  A W Wallace; A Salahieh; A Lawrence; K Spector; C Owens; D Alonso
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Beating-Heart Versus Conventional On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Umar A R Chaudhry; Leanne Harling; Amir H Sepehripour; George Stavridis; John Kokotsakis; Hutan Ashrafian; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults.

Authors:  Michael P W Grocott; Michael G Mythen; Tong J Gan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Fellahi; Marc-Olivier Fischer; Olivier Rebet; Massimo Massetti; Jean-Louis Gérard; Jean-Luc Hanouz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Comparison of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor to thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Timothy R Ball; Benjamin C Culp; Vivekkumar Patel; David F Gloyna; David P Ciceri; William C Culp
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  A A Smetkin; A Hussain; V V Kuzkov; L J Bjertnæs; M Y Kirov
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 8.  Electrical bioimpedance cardiography: an old technology with new hopes for the future.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Fellahi; Marc-Olivier Fischer
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.

Authors:  Timothy M Maus; Bradley Reber; Dalia A Banks; Ashley Berry; Emmanuel Guerrero; Gerard R Manecke
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Can endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising following cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Jean-Luc Fellahi; Marc-Olivier Fischer; Audrey Dalbera; Massimo Massetti; Jean-Louis Gérard; Jean-Luc Hanouz
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring for Hemodynamic Management in Perioperative Medicine.

Authors:  Julia Y Nicklas; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-11-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.