Valeria Panebianco1, Ettore De Berardinis2, Giovanni Barchetti3, Giuseppe Simone4, Constantino Leonardo2, Marcello Domenico Grompone3, Maurizio Del Monte3, Davide Carano3, Michele Gallucci4, James Catto5, Carlo Catalano3. 1. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 336, 00161, Rome, Italy. Valeria.panebianco@uniroma1.it. 2. Department of Gynaecological-Obstetric and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 336, 00161, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 336, 00161, Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Insitute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. 5. Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to determine the ability of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to differentiate muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) from non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: Patients underwent mpMRI before tumour resection. Four MRI sets, i.e. T2-weighted (T2W) + perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), T2W plus diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2W + DWI + PWI, and T2W + DWI + PWI + dif-fusion tensor imaging (DTI) were interpreted qualitatively by two radiologists, blinded to histology results. PWI, DWI and DTI were also analysed quantitatively. Accuracy was determined using histopathology as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 82 tumours were analysed. Ninety-six percent of T1-labeled tumours by the T2W + DWI + PWI image set were confirmed to be NMIBC at histopathology. Overall accuracy of the complete mpMRI protocol was 94% in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC. PWI, DWI and DTI quantitative parameters were shown to be significantly different in cancerous versus non-cancerous areas within the bladder wall in T2-labelled lesions. CONCLUSIONS: MpMRI with DWI and DTI appears a reliable staging tool for bladder cancer. If our data are validated, then mpMRI could precede cystoscopic resection to allow a faster recognition of MIBC and accelerated treatment pathways. KEY POINTS: • A critical step in BCa staging is to differentiate NMIBC from MIBC. • Morphological and functional sequences are reliable techniques in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC. • Diffusion tensor imaging could be an additional tool in BCa staging.
OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to determine the ability of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to differentiate muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) from non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS:Patients underwent mpMRI before tumour resection. Four MRI sets, i.e. T2-weighted (T2W) + perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), T2W plus diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2W + DWI + PWI, and T2W + DWI + PWI + dif-fusion tensor imaging (DTI) were interpreted qualitatively by two radiologists, blinded to histology results. PWI, DWI and DTI were also analysed quantitatively. Accuracy was determined using histopathology as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 82 tumours were analysed. Ninety-six percent of T1-labeled tumours by the T2W + DWI + PWI image set were confirmed to be NMIBC at histopathology. Overall accuracy of the complete mpMRI protocol was 94% in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC. PWI, DWI and DTI quantitative parameters were shown to be significantly different in cancerous versus non-cancerous areas within the bladder wall in T2-labelled lesions. CONCLUSIONS: MpMRI with DWI and DTI appears a reliable staging tool for bladder cancer. If our data are validated, then mpMRI could precede cystoscopic resection to allow a faster recognition of MIBC and accelerated treatment pathways. KEY POINTS: • A critical step in BCa staging is to differentiate NMIBC from MIBC. • Morphological and functional sequences are reliable techniques in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC. • Diffusion tensor imaging could be an additional tool in BCa staging.
Authors: Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Otakar Capoun; Daniel Cohen; Eva M Compérat; Virginia Hernández; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Morgan Rouprêt; Bas W G van Rhijn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Viktor Soukup; Richard J Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Kate D Linton; Derek J Rosario; Francis Thomas; Naomi Rubin; John R Goepel; Maysam F Abbod; James W F Catto Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Maurizio Brausi; Laurence Collette; Karlheinz Kurth; Adrian P van der Meijden; Wim Oosterlinck; J A Witjes; Donald Newling; Christian Bouffioux; Richard J Sylvester Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Giovanni Barchetti; Giuseppe Simone; Isabella Ceravolo; Vincenzo Salvo; Riccardo Campa; Francesco Del Giudice; Ettore De Berardinis; Dorelsa Buccilli; Carlo Catalano; Michele Gallucci; James W F Catto; Valeria Panebianco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: V Hechler; M Rink; D Beyersdorff; M Beer; A J Beer; V Panebianco; M Pecoraro; C Bolenz; G Salomon Journal: Urologe A Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Thaisa Gvozdenovic Medina Bricio; Gabriel Lion Gouvea; Rafael Vasconcelos Barros; Fernando Chahud; Jorge Elias; Rodolfo B Reis; Valdair F Muglia Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 5.605
Authors: Valeria Panebianco; Yoshifumi Narumi; Ersan Altun; Bernard H Bochner; Jason A Efstathiou; Shaista Hafeez; Robert Huddart; Steve Kennish; Seth Lerner; Rodolfo Montironi; Valdair F Muglia; Georg Salomon; Stephen Thomas; Hebert Alberto Vargas; J Alfred Witjes; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Jelle Barentsz; James W F Catto Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 20.096