| Literature DB >> 28180002 |
Diaa El Din Mohamed El Hennawi1, Mohamed Rifaat Ahmed1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recurrent tonsillitis is a common disease with marked evidence of affecting children quality of life (QOL) such as their progression in school and increased burden to extended families. The aim of this study was to compare the QOL outcomes after conventional dissection tonsillectomy versus azithromycin treatment in controlling recurrent tonsillitis.Entities:
Keywords: azithromycin; children; quality of life; recurrent tonsillitis; tonsillectomy
Year: 2016 PMID: 28180002 PMCID: PMC5283771 DOI: 10.1556/1646.8.2016.4.2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interv Med Appl Sci ISSN: 2061-1617
Mean degree of different recurrent tonsillitis symptoms in both groups before treatment
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Dysphagia | 8.1 | 1.5 | 8.7 | 1.1 | 0.14 | 0.864 |
| Fever | 9.3 | 1.1 | 8.9 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.719 |
| Arthralgia | 7.2 | 0.9 | 7.9 | 1.4 | 0.66 | 0.782 |
| Body ache | 8.7 | 1.4 | 8.1 | 0.8 | 0.48 | 0.965 |
Insignificant p > 0.05
Mean degree of different recurrent tonsillitis symptoms in both groups after treatment
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Dysphagia | 5.3 | 1.8 | 4.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.568 |
| Fever | 4.3 | 0.9 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.759 |
| Arthralgia | 3.9 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.657 |
| Body ache | 3.7 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.801 |
Insignificant p > 0.05
Quality of life scale assessment in Group A pre- and post-tonsillectomy
| Preoperative( | Postoperative( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | |||||
| Poor | 44 | 47.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0001 | |
| Fair | 36 | 39.1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Average | 9 | 9.9 | 8 | 8.6 | ||
| Good | 3 | 3.3 | 84 | 91.4 | ||
Highly significant at p < 0.01
Quality of life scale assessment in Group B pre- and post-tonsillectomy
| Pre-treatment ( | Post-treatment ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | |||||
| Poor | 48 | 47.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0001 | |
| Fair | 32 | 39.1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Average | 7 | 9.9 | 4 | 4.3 | ||
| Good | 5 | 3.3 | 88 | 95.7 | ||
Highly significant at p < 0.01
Fig. 1.Quality of life scale assessment in both groups after treatment
Quality of life scale assessment in both groups after treatment
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | |||||
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.548 | |
| Fair | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Average | 8 | 8.6 | 4 | 4.3 | ||
| Good | 84 | 91.4 | 88 | 95.7 | ||
Insignificant p > 0.05