| Literature DB >> 28178274 |
Weixin Liu1,2, Sergei Golovatch3, Thomas Wesener2, Mingyi Tian1.
Abstract
Animal life in caves has fascinated researchers and the public alike because of the unusual and sometimes bizarre morphological adaptations observed in numerous troglobitic species. Despite their worldwide diversity, the adaptations of cave millipedes (Diplopoda) to a troglobitic lifestyle have rarely been examined. In this study, morphological characters were analyzed in species belonging to four different orders (Glomerida, Polydesmida, Chordeumatida, and Spirostreptida) and six different families (Glomeridae, Paradoxosomatidae, Polydesmidae, Haplodesmidae, Megalotylidae, and Cambalopsidae) that represent the taxonomic diversity of class Diplopoda. We focused on the recently discovered millipede fauna of caves in southern China. Thirty different characters were used to compare cave troglobites and epigean species within the same genera. A character matrix was created to analyze convergent evolution of cave adaptations. Males and females were analyzed independently to examine sex differences in cave adaptations. While 10 characters only occurred in a few phylogenetic groups, 20 characters were scored for in all families. Of these, four characters were discovered to have evolved convergently in all troglobitic millipedes. The characters that represented potential morphological cave adaptations in troglobitic species were: (1) a longer body; (2) a lighter body color; (3) elongation of the femora; and (4) elongation of the tarsi of walking legs. Surprisingly, female, but not male, antennae were more elongated in troglobites than in epigean species. Our study clearly shows that morphological adaptations have evolved convergently in different, unrelated millipede orders and families, most likely as a direct adaptation to cave life.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28178274 PMCID: PMC5298257 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Photographs of troglobitic cave millipedes.
(A) Hyleoglomeris sp. (Glomeridae, Glomerida); (B) Epanerchodus sp. (Polydesmidae, Polydesmida); (C) Glyphiulus sp. (Cambalopsidae, Spirostreptida); (D) Eutrichodesmus sp. (Haplodesmidae, Polydesmida); (E) Nepalella sp. (Megalotylidae, Chordeumatida); (F) Desmoxytes sp. (Paradoxosomatidae, Polydesmida).
Fig 2Phylogenetic tree and selected taxa.
Species pairs included in this study are marked in red. Modified from [100].
Specimens selected and repositories of the vouchers.
Troglobites are marked in bold. Abbreviations for museum repositories: MNHN = Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Pairs, France; SCAU = South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; SWUNM = Srinakharinwirot University Natural History Museum, Bangkok, Thailand; ZMUC = Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; ZMUM = Zoological Museum, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
| Order | Family | Species | Ecology (locality) | Repository/collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glomerida | Glomeridae | Cave Qiaoqu, Guangxi, China | SCAU, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ paratypes | |
| Thailand | SWUNM, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ | |||
| Polydesmida | Paradoxosomatidae | Cave Fengliu, Guangxi, China | SCAU, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ paratypes | |
| lowland rainforest, Yala, Thailand | ZMUC, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ paratypes | |||
| Polydesmida | Polydesmidae | Cave Zhakou, Hubei, China | SCAU, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ | |
| Yunnan, China | ZMUM, 1 ♂ | |||
| Yunnan, China | ZMUM, 1 ♀ | |||
| Polydesmida | Haplodesmidae | Cave Zhenzhuyan, Guangxi, China | SCAU, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ | |
| Sichuan, China | SCAU, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ | |||
| Chordeumatida | Megalotylidae | Cave Hejia, Guizhou, China | SCAU, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ | |
| Sichuan, China | ZMUM, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ | |||
| Spirostreptida | Cambalopsidae | Cave Shuilian, Hubei, China | SCAU, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ | |
| Jiangxi, China | SCAU, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ |
Character discussion.
| Characters |
|---|
Fig 3Epanerchodus sp. (Polydesmidae, Polydesmida).
Morphological characters selected to compare cave and epigean millipede species.
Fig 4SEM plate measurements.
(A) Antenna of a troglobitic Glyphiulus sp., antenna measurements, C8–C12; (B) Antenna of an epigean Hyleoglomeris sp., C13; (C) Midleg of a troglobitic Glyphiulus sp., midleg measurements, C24–C28; (D) Midleg of an epigean Glyphiulus sp., C29; (E) Mandible of a troglobitic Glyphiulus sp., C16–C17; (F) Mandible of an epigean Hyleoglomeris sp., mandible measurements, C18; (G) Telson of a troglobitic Glyphiulus sp., C30; (H) Head of an epigean Hyleoglomeris sp., number and size of ocelli, C4, C6; Tömösváry organ’s measurements, C7. Abbreviations: A1–A7 = antennomeres 1–7; Cx = coxa; Pre = prefemur; Fem = femur; Post = postfemur; Tib = tibia; Tar = tarsus; s = accessory spine; eT = external tooth; iT = internal tooth; Pl = pectinate lamellae; iA = intermediate area; Mp = molar plate; Pre-a = Pre-anal; TO = Tömösváry organ; O = ocelli.
Fig 5SEM plate of Glyphiulus spp.
(A) Head and collum of a troglobitic Glyphiulus sp.; (B) Head and collum of an epigean Glyphiulus sp. Abbreviations: O = ocelli.
Fig 6Male midbody legs of each of the six families.
Red color represents the leg of a troglobite; black color marks the epigean congener. 1: coxa; 2: prefemur; 3: femur; 4: postfemur; 5: tibia; 6: tarsus.
Fig 7Male antennae in each of the six families.
Green color represents the troglobite species; black color the epigean species. 1–7: antennomeres 1–7. Differences in the length/width ratio of the antennomeres were only obvious in the family Paradoxosomatidae (Polydesmida).