Literature DB >> 23206142

Ecomorphological convergence of cave communities.

Peter Trontelj1, Andrej Blejec, Cene Fišer.   

Abstract

Extreme selective environments are commonly believed to funnel evolution toward a few predictable outcomes. Caves are well-known extreme environments with characteristically adapted faunas that are similar in appearance, physiology, and behavior all over the world, even if not closely related. Morphological diversity between closely related cave species has been explained by difference in time since colonization and different ecological influence from the surface. Here, we tested a more classical hypothesis: morphological diversity is niche-based, and different morphologies reflect properties of microhabitats within caves. We analyzed seven communities with altogether 30 species of the subterranean amphipod (crustacean) genus Niphargus using multivariate morphometrics, multinomial logit models cross-validation, and phylogenetic reconstruction. Species clustered into four distinct ecomorph classes-small pore, cave stream, cave lake, and lake giants-associated with specific cave microhabitats and of multiple independent phylogenetic origins. Traits commonly regarded as adaptations to caves, such as antenna length, were shown to be related to microhabitat parameters, such as flow velocity. These results demonstrate that under the selection pressure of extreme environment, the ecomorphological structure of communities can converge. Thus, morphological diversity does not result from adaptive response to temporal and ecological gradients, but from fine-level niche partitioning.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206142     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01734.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  20 in total

1.  Patterns of population genetic variation in sympatric chiltoniid amphipods within a calcrete aquifer reveal a dynamic subterranean environment.

Authors:  T M Bradford; M Adams; M T Guzik; W F Humphreys; A D Austin; S J B Cooper
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Life-history specialization was not an evolutionary dead-end in Pyrenean cave beetles.

Authors:  Alexandra Cieslak; Javier Fresneda; Ignacio Ribera
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Interactions at surface-subterranean ecotones: structure and function of food webs within spring orifices.

Authors:  Parvathi Nair; Peter H Diaz; Weston H Nowlin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Morphological evolution of coexisting amphipod species pairs from sulfidic caves suggests competitive interactions and character displacement, but no environmental filtering and convergence.

Authors:  Cene Fišer; Roman Luštrik; Serban Sarbu; Jean-François Flot; Peter Trontelj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The dorsal chaetotaxy of Trogolaphysa (Collembola, Paronellidae), with descriptions of two new species from caves in Belize.

Authors:  Felipe N Soto-Adames; Steven J Taylor
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 1.546

6.  Can environment predict cryptic diversity? The case of Niphargus inhabiting Western Carpathian groundwater.

Authors:  Ioana Nicoleta Meleg; Valerija Zakšek; Cene Fišer; Beatrice Simona Kelemen; Oana Teodora Moldovan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Diversity and distribution of freshwater amphipod species in Switzerland (Crustacea: Amphipoda).

Authors:  Florian Altermatt; Roman Alther; Cene Fišer; Jukka Jokela; Marjeta Konec; Daniel Küry; Elvira Mächler; Pascal Stucki; Anja Marie Westram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A subterranean adaptive radiation of amphipods in Europe.

Authors:  Špela Borko; Peter Trontelj; Ole Seehausen; Ajda Moškrič; Cene Fišer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Morphologically Cryptic Amphipod Species Are "Ecological Clones" at Regional but Not at Local Scale: A Case Study of Four Niphargus Species.

Authors:  Žiga Fišer; Florian Altermatt; Valerija Zakšek; Tea Knapič; Cene Fišer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does the Cave Environment Reduce Functional Diversity?

Authors:  Camile Sorbo Fernandes; Marco Antonio Batalha; Maria Elina Bichuette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.