| Literature DB >> 28178161 |
Ching-Fang Hu1, Tieh-Cheng Fu, Chung-Yao Chen, Carl Pai-Chu Chen, Yu-Ju Lin, Chih-Chin Hsu.
Abstract
Unilateral fibrous contracture of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle is the major pathophysiology in infants with congenital muscular torticollis (CMT). Physical examination is not always sufficient to detect minimal muscle fibrosis in involved SCM muscles.A prospective study for SCM muscle fibrosis in CMT infants by quantifying echotexture and muscle thickness during the course of treatment is highlighted in the study.Convenience samples of 21 female and 29 male infants with CMT, who were 1 to 12 months old, underwent physiotherapy for at least 3 months and were followed for 4.7 ± 0.4 months. All infants had at least 2 clinical assessments and ultrasonographic examinations for bilateral SCM muscles during follow-up. The K value, derived from the difference in echo intensities between the involved and uninvolved SCM muscles on longitudinal sonograms, was used to represent the severity of muscle fibrosis. Bilateral SCM muscle thickness and ratio of involved to uninvolved muscle thickness (Ratio I/U) were obtained simultaneously. Clinical outcome was also recorded.No subjects underwent surgical intervention during follow-up. The K value decreased from 6.85 ± 0.58 to 1.30 ± 0.36 at the end of follow-up (P < 0.001), which reflected the decrease of muscle fibrosis. The Ratio I/U decreased from 1.11 ± 0.04 to 0.97 ± 0.02 during treatment, which was possibly related to the increased uninvolved SCM muscle thickness.In conclusion, echotexture is an efficient indicator for reflecting a wide degree of muscle fibrosis in infants with CMT and is informative during the treatment course.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28178161 PMCID: PMC5313018 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Figure 1Flowchart of infant selection, intervention, and follow-up.
Figure 2US of bilateral SCM muscles in infants with CMT. (A) Longitudinal sonograms of maximum anterior–posterior diameters of the involved (MTi) and uninvolved (MTu) SCM muscles. Ratio I/U was calculated as MTi/MTu. (B) Longitudinal sonograms of the MEI of every pixel in the ROI in the uninvolved (dotted line) and involved (solid line) muscles. The K value was calculated by MEIuninvolved − MEIinvolved.
Figure 3Measurements of (A) K value and (B) scatter diagrams for K value during follow-up. (A) ∗P values between the 1st and 2nd, 3rd, and 4th measurements (all P < 0.001). †P values between the 2nd and 3rd (P < 0.001) and 4th measurements (P = 0.015). (B) The K value of involved SCM muscles shows a negative-slope linear regression trend line (solid line).
Figure 4Measurement of (A) muscle thickness and (B) scatter diagrams for muscle thickness during follow-up. (A) Difference in involved muscle thickness (black bar) between each measurement was not significant. ∗P values for the uninvolved muscles (white bar) between the 1st and 2nd (P = 0.004), 3rd (P = 0.039), and 4th measurements (P = 0.026). ∗P value for Ratio I/U between the 1st and 4th measurement (P = 0.006). (B) Linear regression trend lines for uninvolved (dotted line) and involved (solid line) SCM muscle thickness, and for Ratio I/U (dashed line) during follow-up.
Correlation between ultrasonographic measurement and clinical information.