Literature DB >> 16965971

Skeletal muscle ultrasonography: Visual versus quantitative evaluation.

Sigrid Pillen1, Mieke van Keimpema, Rutger A J Nievelstein, Aad Verrips, Wilma van Kruijsbergen-Raijmann, Machiel J Zwarts.   

Abstract

In this study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of visual versus quantitative evaluation of skeletal muscle ultrasound in children suspected of having a neuromuscular disorder (NMD). Ultrasonography (US) scans of four muscles (biceps brachii, forearm flexors, quadriceps femoris, anterior tibial muscle) were made in 76 children. All images were visually evaluated using the Heckmatt criteria and quantitatively evaluated with computer-assisted grey-scale analysis of muscle echo intensity. Visual evaluation could achieve a sensitivity up to 71%, with a specificity of 92%. With quantification, a sensitivity of 87% accompanied by a specificity of 67% was found, but other diagnostic values could be achieved, depending on the cut-off point. Quantification resulted in a higher interobserver agreement (kappa 0.86) compared with visual evaluation (kappa 0.53). We conclude that quantification of echo intensity is a more objective and accurate method. Because it can achieve higher sensitivities, it is better-suited for the screening task in the diagnostic phase of children with a NMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16965971     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  48 in total

1.  Sonoanatomy relevant for ultrasound-guided central neuraxial blocks via the paramedian approach in the lumbar region.

Authors:  M K Karmakar; X Li; W H Kwok; A M-H Ho; W D Ngan Kee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Quantitative evaluation of the echo intensity of the median nerve and flexor muscles of the forearm in the young and the elderly.

Authors:  X Li; M K Karmakar; A Lee; W H Kwok; L A H Critchley; T Gin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Qualitative and quantitative skeletal muscle ultrasound in late-onset acid maltase deficiency.

Authors:  Craig M Zaidman; Elizabeth C Malkus; Catherine Siener; Julaine Florence; Alan Pestronk; Muhammad Al-Lozi
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Relationship between quadriceps femoris echo intensity, muscle power, and functional capacity of older men.

Authors:  Eurico Nestor Wilhelm; Anderson Rech; Felipe Minozzo; Regis Radaelli; Cíntia Ehlers Botton; Ronei Silveira Pinto
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-02-11

6.  Measurement of intramuscular fat by muscle echo intensity.

Authors:  Hui-Ju Young; Nathan T Jenkins; Qun Zhao; Kevin K Mccully
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Quantitative muscle ultrasound measures rapid declines over time in children with SMA type 1.

Authors:  Kay W Ng; Anne M Connolly; Craig M Zaidman
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Minimal training is required to reliably perform quantitative ultrasound of muscle.

Authors:  Craig M Zaidman; Jim S Wu; Sarah Wilder; Basil T Darras; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Association between ultrasound measurements of muscle thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity and skeletal muscle strength in the elderly.

Authors:  Eva Maria Strasser; Thomas Draskovits; Markus Praschak; Michael Quittan; Alexandra Graf
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2013-03-02

10.  Physical training in boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: the protocol of the No Use is Disuse study.

Authors:  Merel Jansen; Imelda Jm de Groot; Nens van Alfen; Alexander Ch Geurts
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.