Tomas Forslund1,2, Björn Wettermark2,3, Morten Andersen3, Paul Hjemdahl1. 1. Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Healthcare Development, Stockholm County Council, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Medicine Solna, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
Aims: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) effectively reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). Three non-vitamin K antagonist OACs (NOACs) are introduced in regular care based on promising results compared with warfarin in randomized trials. This study compares outcomes with NOAC vs. warfarin treatment in OAC naïve AF patients in routine care, including primary care, in a large region with decentralized anticoagulant treatment. Methods and results: Population-based cohort study. Individuals with non-valvular AF who initiated treatment with NOAC (n = 9279) or warfarin (n = 12 919) from 2012 to 2015 were identified in the Stockholm administrative health data register (population 2.2 million). Adjusted Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate TIA/ischaemic or unspecified stroke/death, and severe bleeds (co-primary endpoints); and secondarily for components of the composites. NOAC patients were younger (72.9 vs. 74.1 years) and had lower CHA2DS2VASc scores (3.42 vs. 3.68) than warfarin patients. NOAC vs. warfarin treatment was associated with similar risks for TIA/ischaemic or unspecified stroke/death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94; 0.85-1.05] and severe bleeds (HR 1.02; 0.88-1.19); lower risks of intracranial bleeds (HR 0.72; 0.53-0.97) or haemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.56; 0.34-0.93), but a higher risk for gastrointestinal bleeds (HR 1.28; 1.04-1.59). The advantages with NOAC treatment were most pronounced with standard dose in patients below 80 years, and with dose reduction in patients aged 80 and above. Conclusion: This population-based cohort study of routine care indicates similar or better effectiveness and safety with NOAC compared with warfarin treatment. NOACs were associated with fewer intracranial bleeds, but more gastrointestinal bleeds. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Aims: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) effectively reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). Three non-vitamin K antagonist OACs (NOACs) are introduced in regular care based on promising results compared with warfarin in randomized trials. This study compares outcomes with NOAC vs. warfarin treatment in OAC naïve AFpatients in routine care, including primary care, in a large region with decentralized anticoagulant treatment. Methods and results: Population-based cohort study. Individuals with non-valvular AF who initiated treatment with NOAC (n = 9279) or warfarin (n = 12 919) from 2012 to 2015 were identified in the Stockholm administrative health data register (population 2.2 million). Adjusted Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate TIA/ischaemic or unspecifiedstroke/death, and severe bleeds (co-primary endpoints); and secondarily for components of the composites. NOACpatients were younger (72.9 vs. 74.1 years) and had lower CHA2DS2VASc scores (3.42 vs. 3.68) than warfarinpatients. NOAC vs. warfarin treatment was associated with similar risks for TIA/ischaemic or unspecifiedstroke/death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94; 0.85-1.05] and severe bleeds (HR 1.02; 0.88-1.19); lower risks of intracranial bleeds (HR 0.72; 0.53-0.97) or haemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.56; 0.34-0.93), but a higher risk for gastrointestinal bleeds (HR 1.28; 1.04-1.59). The advantages with NOAC treatment were most pronounced with standard dose in patients below 80 years, and with dose reduction in patients aged 80 and above. Conclusion: This population-based cohort study of routine care indicates similar or better effectiveness and safety with NOAC compared with warfarin treatment. NOACs were associated with fewer intracranial bleeds, but more gastrointestinal bleeds. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Konstantinos C Siontis; Xiaosong Zhang; Ashley Eckard; Nicole Bhave; Douglas E Schaubel; Kevin He; Anca Tilea; Austin G Stack; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Xiaoxi Yao; Peter A Noseworthy; Nilay D Shah; Rajiv Saran; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Per Wändell; Axel C Carlsson; Martin J Holzmann; Johan Ärnlöv; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Ann Med Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 4.709
Authors: Per Wändell; Axel C Carlsson; Danijela Gasevic; Martin J Holzmann; Johan Ärnlöv; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Stine Munk Hald; Sören Möller; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Mike Sharma; Hanne Christensen; Maja Hellfritzsch; Anton Pottegård; Jesper Hallas; David Gaist Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-05-03
Authors: Joris J Komen; Eibert R Heerdink; Olaf H Klungel; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Tomas Forslund; Björn Wettermark; Paul Hjemdahl Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother Date: 2021-04-09
Authors: Irene Eriksson; Thomas Cars; Fredrik Piehl; Rickard E Malmström; Björn Wettermark; Mia von Euler Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Xiaoyan Li; Allison Keshishian; Melissa Hamilton; Ruslan Horblyuk; Kiran Gupta; Xuemei Luo; Jack Mardekian; Keith Friend; Anagha Nadkarni; Xianying Pan; Gregory Y H Lip; Steve Deitelzweig Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 3.240