A K S Salama1, S J Moschos2. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 2. Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Abstract
Background: Cancers escape immune surveillance via distinct mechanisms that involve central (negative selection within the thymus) or peripheral (lack of costimulation, receipt of death/anergic signals by tumor, immunoregulatory cell populations) immune tolerance. During the 1990s, moderate clinical benefit was seen using several cytokine therapies for a limited number of cancers. Over the past 20 years, extensive research has been performed to understand the role of various components of peripheral immune tolerance, with the co-inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death 1 (PD-1), and its ligand (PD-L1) being the most well-characterized at preclinical and clinical levels. Patients and methods: We used PubMed and Google Scholar searches to identify key articles published reporting preclinical and clinical studies investigating CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1, frequently cited review articles, and clinical studies of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitors, including combination therapy strategies. We also searched recent oncology congress presentations and clinicaltrials.gov to cover the most up-to-date clinical trial data and ongoing clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations. Results: Inhibiting CTLA-4 and PD-1 using monoclonal antibody therapies administered as single agents has been associated with clinical benefit in distinct patient subgroups across several malignancies. Concurrent blockade of CTLA-4 and components of the PD-1/PD-L1 system using various schedules has shown synergy and even higher incidence of durable antitumor responses at the expense of increased rates of immune-mediated adverse events, which can be life-threatening, but are rarely fatal and are reversible in most cases using established treatment guidelines. Conclusions: Dual immune checkpoint blockade has demonstrated promising clinical benefit in numerous solid tumor types. This example of concurrent modulation of multiple components of the immune system is currently being investigated in other cancers using various immunomodulatory strategies.
Background: Cancers escape immune surveillance via distinct mechanisms that involve central (negative selection within the thymus) or peripheral (lack of costimulation, receipt of death/anergic signals by tumor, immunoregulatory cell populations) immune tolerance. During the 1990s, moderate clinical benefit was seen using several cytokine therapies for a limited number of cancers. Over the past 20 years, extensive research has been performed to understand the role of various components of peripheral immune tolerance, with the co-inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death 1 (PD-1), and its ligand (PD-L1) being the most well-characterized at preclinical and clinical levels. Patients and methods: We used PubMed and Google Scholar searches to identify key articles published reporting preclinical and clinical studies investigating CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1, frequently cited review articles, and clinical studies of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitors, including combination therapy strategies. We also searched recent oncology congress presentations and clinicaltrials.gov to cover the most up-to-date clinical trial data and ongoing clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations. Results: Inhibiting CTLA-4 and PD-1 using monoclonal antibody therapies administered as single agents has been associated with clinical benefit in distinct patient subgroups across several malignancies. Concurrent blockade of CTLA-4 and components of the PD-1/PD-L1 system using various schedules has shown synergy and even higher incidence of durable antitumor responses at the expense of increased rates of immune-mediated adverse events, which can be life-threatening, but are rarely fatal and are reversible in most cases using established treatment guidelines. Conclusions: Dual immune checkpoint blockade has demonstrated promising clinical benefit in numerous solid tumor types. This example of concurrent modulation of multiple components of the immune system is currently being investigated in other cancers using various immunomodulatory strategies.
Authors: Evan J Lipson; Jeremy G Vincent; Myriam Loyo; Luciane T Kagohara; Brandon S Luber; Hao Wang; Haiying Xu; Suresh K Nayar; Timothy S Wang; David Sidransky; Robert A Anders; Suzanne L Topalian; Janis M Taube Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Mabel Ryder; Margaret Callahan; Michael A Postow; Jedd Wolchok; James A Fagin Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Alexandra Snyder; Vladimir Makarov; Taha Merghoub; Jianda Yuan; Jedd D Wolchok; Timothy A Chan; Jesse M Zaretsky; Alexis Desrichard; Logan A Walsh; Michael A Postow; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Travis J Hollmann; Cameron Bruggeman; Kasthuri Kannan; Yanyun Li; Ceyhan Elipenahli; Cailian Liu; Christopher T Harbison; Lisu Wang; Antoni Ribas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Antoni Ribas; Richard Kefford; Margaret A Marshall; Cornelis J A Punt; John B Haanen; Maribel Marmol; Claus Garbe; Helen Gogas; Jacob Schachter; Gerald Linette; Paul Lorigan; Kari L Kendra; Michele Maio; Uwe Trefzer; Michael Smylie; Grant A McArthur; Brigitte Dreno; Paul D Nathan; Jacek Mackiewicz; John M Kirkwood; Jesus Gomez-Navarro; Bo Huang; Dmitri Pavlov; Axel Hauschild Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eliezer M Van Allen; Diana Miao; Bastian Schilling; Sachet A Shukla; Christian Blank; Lisa Zimmer; Antje Sucker; Uwe Hillen; Marnix H Geukes Foppen; Simone M Goldinger; Jochen Utikal; Jessica C Hassel; Benjamin Weide; Katharina C Kaehler; Carmen Loquai; Peter Mohr; Ralf Gutzmer; Reinhard Dummer; Stacey Gabriel; Catherine J Wu; Dirk Schadendorf; Levi A Garraway Journal: Science Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jason Madore; Ricardo E Vilain; Alexander M Menzies; Hojabr Kakavand; James S Wilmott; Jessica Hyman; Jennifer H Yearley; Richard F Kefford; John F Thompson; Georgina V Long; Peter Hersey; Richard A Scolyer Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Bernard Escudier; David F McDermott; Saby George; Hans J Hammers; Sandhya Srinivas; Scott S Tykodi; Jeffrey A Sosman; Giuseppe Procopio; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel Castellano; Toni K Choueiri; Howard Gurney; Frede Donskov; Petri Bono; John Wagstaff; Thomas C Gauler; Takeshi Ueda; Yoshihiko Tomita; Fabio A Schutz; Christian Kollmannsberger; James Larkin; Alain Ravaud; Jason S Simon; Li-An Xu; Ian M Waxman; Padmanee Sharma Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Baosheng Chen; David M Alvarado; Micah Iticovici; Nathan S Kau; Haeseong Park; Parag J Parikh; Dinesh Thotala; Matthew A Ciorba Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Jacob Appelbaum; David Wells; Joseph B Hiatt; Gideon Steinbach; F Marc Stewart; Hannah Thomas; Paul Nghiem; Raj P Kapur; John A Thompson; Shailender Bhatia Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 13.751