PURPOSE: In phase I/II trials, the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4-blocking monoclonal antibody tremelimumab induced durable responses in a subset of patients with advanced melanoma. This phase III study evaluated overall survival (OS) and other safety and efficacy end points in patients with advanced melanoma treated with tremelimumab or standard-of-care chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with treatment-naive, unresectable stage IIIc or IV melanoma were randomly assigned at a ratio of one to one to tremelimumab (15 mg/kg once every 90 days) or physician's choice of standard-of-care chemotherapy (temozolomide or dacarbazine). RESULTS: In all, 655 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. The test statistic crossed the prespecified futility boundary at second interim analysis after 340 deaths, but survival follow-up continued. At final analysis with 534 events, median OS by intent to treat was 12.6 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 14.3) for tremelimumab and 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.36 to 11.96) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.88; P = .127). Objective response rates were similar in the two arms: 10.7% in the tremelimumab arm and 9.8% in the chemotherapy arm. However, response duration (measured from date of random assignment) was significantly longer after tremelimumab (35.8 v 13.7 months; P = .0011). Diarrhea, pruritus, and rash were the most common treatment-related adverse events in the tremelimumab arm; 7.4% had endocrine toxicities. Seven deaths in the tremelimumab arm and one in the chemotherapy arm were considered treatment related by either investigators or sponsor. CONCLUSION: This study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival advantage of treatment with tremelimumab over standard-of-care chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: In phase I/II trials, the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4-blocking monoclonal antibody tremelimumab induced durable responses in a subset of patients with advanced melanoma. This phase III study evaluated overall survival (OS) and other safety and efficacy end points in patients with advanced melanoma treated with tremelimumab or standard-of-care chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with treatment-naive, unresectable stage IIIc or IV melanoma were randomly assigned at a ratio of one to one to tremelimumab (15 mg/kg once every 90 days) or physician's choice of standard-of-care chemotherapy (temozolomide or dacarbazine). RESULTS: In all, 655 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. The test statistic crossed the prespecified futility boundary at second interim analysis after 340 deaths, but survival follow-up continued. At final analysis with 534 events, median OS by intent to treat was 12.6 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 14.3) for tremelimumab and 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.36 to 11.96) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.88; P = .127). Objective response rates were similar in the two arms: 10.7% in the tremelimumab arm and 9.8% in the chemotherapy arm. However, response duration (measured from date of random assignment) was significantly longer after tremelimumab (35.8 v 13.7 months; P = .0011). Diarrhea, pruritus, and rash were the most common treatment-related adverse events in the tremelimumab arm; 7.4% had endocrine toxicities. Seven deaths in the tremelimumab arm and one in the chemotherapy arm were considered treatment related by either investigators or sponsor. CONCLUSION: This study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival advantage of treatment with tremelimumab over standard-of-care chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma.
Authors: Caroline Robert; Luc Thomas; Igor Bondarenko; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey Weber; Claus Garbe; Celeste Lebbe; Jean-François Baurain; Alessandro Testori; Jean-Jacques Grob; Neville Davidson; Jon Richards; Michele Maio; Axel Hauschild; Wilson H Miller; Pere Gascon; Michal Lotem; Kaan Harmankaya; Ramy Ibrahim; Stephen Francis; Tai-Tsang Chen; Rachel Humphrey; Axel Hoos; Jedd D Wolchok Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Antoni Ribas; Douglas C Hanson; Dennis A Noe; Robert Millham; Deborah J Guyot; Steven H Bernstein; Paul C Canniff; Amarnath Sharma; Jesus Gomez-Navarro Journal: Oncologist Date: 2007-07
Authors: Antoni Ribas; Luis H Camacho; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Dmitri Pavlov; Cecile A Bulanhagui; Robert Millham; Begoña Comin-Anduix; James M Reuben; Elisabeth Seja; Charla A Parker; Amarnath Sharma; John A Glaspy; Jesus Gomez-Navarro Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M R Middleton; J J Grob; N Aaronson; G Fierlbeck; W Tilgen; S Seiter; M Gore; S Aamdal; J Cebon; A Coates; B Dreno; M Henz; D Schadendorf; A Kapp; J Weiss; U Fraass; P Statkevich; M Muller; N Thatcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S J O'Day; M Maio; V Chiarion-Sileni; T F Gajewski; H Pehamberger; I N Bondarenko; P Queirolo; L Lundgren; S Mikhailov; L Roman; C Verschraegen; R Humphrey; R Ibrahim; V de Pril; A Hoos; J D Wolchok Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M B Atkins; M T Lotze; J P Dutcher; R I Fisher; G Weiss; K Margolin; J Abrams; M Sznol; D Parkinson; M Hawkins; C Paradise; L Kunkel; S A Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John M Kirkwood; Paul Lorigan; Peter Hersey; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; David McDermott; Margaret A Marshall; Jesus Gomez-Navarro; Jane Q Liang; Cecile A Bulanhagui Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Luis H Camacho; Scott Antonia; Jeffrey Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Thomas F Gajewski; Bruce Redman; Dmitri Pavlov; Cecile Bulanhagui; Viviana A Bozon; Jesus Gomez-Navarro; Antoni Ribas Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lidia Robert; Jennifer Tsoi; Xiaoyan Wang; Ryan Emerson; Blanca Homet; Thinle Chodon; Stephen Mok; Rong Rong Huang; Alistair J Cochran; Begoña Comin-Anduix; Richard C Koya; Thomas G Graeber; Harlan Robins; Antoni Ribas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Valsamo Anagnostou; Mark Yarchoan; Aaron R Hansen; Hao Wang; Franco Verde; Elad Sharon; Deborah Collyar; Laura Q M Chow; Patrick M Forde Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531