Literature DB >> 28173732

Patient, caregiver and clinician views on engagement in comparative effectiveness research.

Laura P Forsythe1, Lori B Frank1, Thomas A Workman2, Tandrea Hilliard2, Daniel Harwell2, Lauren Fayish1.   

Abstract

AIM: Describe patient, caregiver and clinician views toward engagement as partners in health research. MATERIALS &
METHODS: Online surveys of patients and caregivers managing rare (n = 560 patients, n = 609 caregivers) or chronic conditions (n = 762 patients, n = 776 caregivers) and practicing clinicians (n = 638).
RESULTS: Over half of respondents were unfamiliar with the concept of partnering with researchers but most expressed interest in working in a research partnership. Potential facilitators endorsed were ensuring research is meaningful, applying results in an understandable way, and sharing results. Lack of time is a potential barrier. Clinicians were most interested in helping researchers decide on intervention comparisons and identifying implications for clinical practice.
CONCLUSION: Patients, caregivers and clinicians are interested in research roles that emphasize usefulness and understandability of research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative effectiveness research; stakeholder engagement; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28173732     DOI: 10.2217/cer-2016-0062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  7 in total

1.  Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Sean Grant; Vivian Welch; Jennifer Petkovic; Joseph Selby; Sally Crowe; Anneliese Synnot; Regina Greer-Smith; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Ellen Tambor; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  PaTH to partnership in stakeholder-engaged research: A framework for stakeholder engagement in the PaTH to Health Diabetes study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Poger; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Cindy L Bryce; Jennifer K Carroll; Lan Kong; Erica B Francis; Jennifer L Kraschnewski
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2019-05-14

3.  Good practices for real-world data studies of treatment and/or comparative effectiveness: Recommendations from the joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on real-world evidence in health care decision making.

Authors:  Marc L Berger; Harold Sox; Richard J Willke; Diana L Brixner; Hans-Georg Eichler; Wim Goettsch; David Madigan; Amr Makady; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Rosanna Tarricone; Shirley V Wang; John Watkins; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Patient Interaction Involving Older Adults: Provider vs. Caregiver Expectations.

Authors:  Pooja Shah; Kaitlin Donovan; Robert Hubal
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-17

5.  Technological and Rehabilitative Concerns: Perspectives of Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Are Musicians.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Joke Veltman; Robert Mandara; Mary Beth Napoli; Sarah Smith; Yoon Choi; Gaelen McCormick; Tim McKenzie; Anamaria Nastase
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

6.  Patient-Community Perspectives on Real-World Evidence: Enhancing Engagement, Understanding, and Trust.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Oehrlein; Jennifer S Graff; Jason Harris; Eleanor M Perfetto
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients' Perspectives on Experiences With Music in Everyday Life: A Multifaceted and Dynamic Phenomenon.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Adam Schwalje
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.