Literature DB >> 28171741

Effectiveness of technologies in the treatment of post-stroke anomia: A systematic review.

Monica Lavoie1, Joël Macoir2, Nathalie Bier3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technologies are becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of language disorders and offer numerous possibilities, but little is known about their effectiveness and limitations. AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of treatments delivered by technology in the management of post-stroke anomia.
METHODS: As a guideline for conducting this review, we used the PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions. We conducted a systematic search of publications in PubMed, PsycInfo and Current Contents. We also consulted Google Scholar. Without any limitations as to publication date, we selected studies designed to assess the effectiveness of an intervention delivered by a technology, namely computer or smart tablet, to specifically improve anomia in post-stroke participants. The main outcomes studied were improvement in naming skills and generalisation to untreated items and daily communication.
RESULTS: We examined 23 studies in this review. To date, computers constitute the most popular technology by far; only a few studies explored the effectiveness of smart tablets. In some studies, technology was used as a therapy tool in a clinical setting, in the presence of the clinician, while in others, therapy with technology was self-administered at home, without the clinician. All studies confirmed the effectiveness of therapy provided by technology to improve naming of trained items. However, generalisation to untrained items is unclear and assessment of generalisation to daily communication is rare. DISCUSSION: The results of this systematic review confirm that technology is an efficient approach in the management of post-stroke anomia. In future studies, ecological tasks aimed at evaluating therapy's effectiveness with word retrieval in real-life situations should be added since the ultimate goal of improving anomia is to increase the ability to retrieve words more easily in everyday life.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anomia; Aphasia; Computer; Smart tablet; Technologies

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28171741     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  8 in total

1.  Effects of a Tablet-Based Home Practice Program With Telepractice on Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Aphasia.

Authors:  Jacquie Kurland; Anna Liu; Polly Stokes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Follow-Up in Aphasia Caused by Acute Stroke in a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Experimental Controlled Noninvasive Study With an iPad-Based App (Neolexon®): Study Protocol of the Lexi Study.

Authors:  Dennis C Thunstedt; Peter Young; Clemens Küpper; Katharina Müller; Regina Becker; Franziska Erbert; Katharina Lehner; Marika Rheinwald; Angelika Pfahler; Marianne Dieterich; Lars Kellert; Katharina Feil
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Multisensory cueing facilitates naming in aphasia.

Authors:  Klaudia Grechuta; Belén Rubio Ballester; Rosa Espín Munné; Teresa Usabiaga Bernal; Begoña Molina Hervás; Bettina Mohr; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Rosa Maria San Segundo; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 4.  [Scoping review of the effectiveness of screen-to-screen-therapy compared to face-to-face-therapy on naming performance for patients with aphasia].

Authors:  Lara Cordes; Svetla Loukanova; Johanna Forstner
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2020-10-05

5.  A Virtual, Randomized, Control Trial of a Digital Therapeutic for Speech, Language, and Cognitive Intervention in Post-stroke Persons With Aphasia.

Authors:  Michelle Braley; Jordyn Sims Pierce; Sadhvi Saxena; Emily De Oliveira; Laura Taraboanta; Veera Anantha; Shaheen E Lakhan; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Speech and Language Practitioners' Experiences of Commercially Available Voice-Assisted Technology: Web-Based Survey Study.

Authors:  Pranav Kulkarni; Orla Duffy; Jonathan Synnott; W George Kernohan; Roisin McNaney
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  A Mobile-based Virtual Reality Speech Rehabilitation App for Patients With Aphasia After Stroke: Development and Pilot Usability Study.

Authors:  Xiaofan Bu; Peter Hf Ng; Ying Tong; Peter Q Chen; Rongrong Fan; Qingping Tang; Qinqin Cheng; Shuangshuang Li; Andy Sk Cheng; Xiangyu Liu
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.364

8.  What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK?

Authors:  Rebecca Palmer; Helen Witts; Timothy Chater
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.