Allen L Ng1, Chien-Fu Chen2, Hyejin Kwon1, Zhiwei Peng1, Cheng S Lee1, YuHuang Wang1,3. 1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland , College Park, Maryland 20742, United States. 2. Institute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University , Taipei, Taiwan 106. 3. Maryland NanoCenter, University of Maryland , College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.
Abstract
A critical challenge to translating field effect transistors into biochemical sensor platforms is the requirement of a gate electrode, which imposes restrictions on sensor device architectures and results in added expense, poorer scalability, and electrical noise. Here we show that it is possible to eliminate the need of the physical gate electrode and dielectrics altogether using a synthetic tube-in-a-tube (Tube∧2) semiconductor. Composed of a semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotube nested in a charged, impermeable covalent functional shell, Tube∧2 allows the semiconducting conduction pathway to be modulated solely by surface functional groups in a chemically gated-all-around configuration. The removal of physical gates significantly simplifies the device architecture and enables photolithography-free, highly scalable fabrication of transistor sensors in nonconventional configurations that are otherwise impossible. We show that concomitant FET sensitivity and single-mismatch selectivity can be achieved with Tube∧2 even in a two-terminal, thin film transistor device configuration that is as simple as a chemiresistor. Miniaturized two-terminal field effect point sensors can also be fabricated, using a straightforward dice-and-dip procedure, for the detection of tuberculosis biomarkers.
A critical challenge to translating field effect transistors into biochemical sensor platforms is the requirement of a gate electrode, which imposes restrictions on sensor device architectures and results in added expense, poorer scalability, and electrical noise. Here we show that it is possible to eliminate the need of the physical gate electrode and dielectrics altogether using a synthetic tube-in-a-tube (Tube∧2) semiconductor. Composed of a semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotube nested in a charged, impermeable covalent functional shell, Tube∧2 allows the semiconducting conduction pathway to be modulated solely by surface functional groups in a chemically gated-all-around configuration. The removal of physical gates significantly simplifies the device architecture and enables photolithography-free, highly scalable fabrication of transistor sensors in nonconventional configurations that are otherwise impossible. We show that concomitant FET sensitivity and single-mismatch selectivity can be achieved with Tube∧2 even in a two-terminal, thin film transistor device configuration that is as simple as a chemiresistor. Miniaturized two-terminal field effect point sensors can also be fabricated, using a straightforward dice-and-dip procedure, for the detection of tuberculosis biomarkers.
The Information Age
started with our ability to modulate current
in a semiconductor by an electrical field. Exploitation of this gating
effect, through chemical binding events, has generated sensitive field
effect transistor (FET) sensors capable of detecting a variety of
biological and chemical species.[1−5] Owing to its real-time, label-free, and miniaturized size features,
electrical sensing is an attractive platform for on-site detection
of viruses and protein biomarkers. Current diagnostic techniques still
typically rely on methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR)[6] and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)[7] which are time-consuming, and require sophisticated
instrumentation and specialized technicians due to multistep procedures.
However, a critical challenge to translating FETs into biochemical
sensor platforms is the requirement of a gate electrode.[8,9] The gate electrode is used to apply an electrical potential in order
to capacitively switch the semiconductor to a highly sensitive ON-state.
Since the semiconductor has to be exposed to the analytes, the devices
are typically gated through a back-gated electrode or an immersed
electrochemical electrode. This gate electrode requirement imposes
significant restrictions on sensor device architectures, limiting
them typically to planar structures, and also results in added expense,
poor scalability, and electrical noise.[5,10,11] On the other hand, the recent innovations in inexpensive,
two-terminal nanowire and carbon nanotube (CNT) chemiresistor sensors
with high sensitivity have opened up new directions for sensor development.[10,12−15]Here we show a thin film field effect sensor composed of synthetic
tube-in-a-tube (Tube∧2) semiconductors, which can
be electrostatically gated through chemically attached groups, eliminating
the need for a physical gate electrode and dielectrics. Tube∧2 is uniquely composed of a semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotube
nested in a charged, impermeable covalent functional shell that allows
the semiconducting conduction pathway to be modulated solely by surface
receptor groups in a chemically gated-all-around configuration (Figure ). The semiconducting
channel and receptor shells are separated only by a subnanometer,
van der Waals spacing. In a comparison to the conventional FET sensor
device architecture, our new device architecture requires only two
electrodes, source and drain, without the need of the third, gate
electrode. The removal of the physical gate electrode significantly
simplifies the device architecture and enables photolithography-free,
highly scalable fabrication of nonconventional FET sensors. Miniaturized
two-terminal point sensors are fabricated as an example to illustrate
this important advantage using a simple, straightforward dice-and-dip
procedure. We show that concomitant FET sensitivity and single-mismatch
selectivity can be achieved with Tube∧2 even in
a two-terminal thin film device configuration that is as simple as
a chemiresistor.
Figure 1
Schematic of chemical gating of a Tube∧2 semiconductor.
(a) Schematic of a conventional top-gated silicon FET. (b) A chemically
gated FET based on Tube∧2. Note that the gray clouded
dots represent charged moieties.
Schematic of chemical gating of a Tube∧2 semiconductor.
(a) Schematic of a conventional top-gated silicon FET. (b) A chemically
gated FET based on Tube∧2. Note that the gray clouded
dots represent charged moieties.To demonstrate this gate-electrode-free detection, Tube∧2 thin film transistor (TFT) sensors were created through
covalent,
outer-wall-selective functionalization of thin films of semiconducting
double-walled carbon nanotube (DWCNT) precursors that were presorted
using density gradient ultracentrifugation.[16,17] Although the major goal of this work is to demonstrate the possibility
of eliminating the need for gate electrodes, the fabricated transistors
can be back-gated globally using the hole-doped silicon substrate,
which allows us to quantitatively compare chemical gating in Tube∧2 with conventional TFT characteristics including threshold
voltage (Vth) and carrier mobility.[18,19] Additionally, we will show it is possible to fabricate free-standing,
two-terminal field effect point sensors.
Materials
and Methods
Tube∧2 Thin Film Preparation
Double-walled
carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs; Unidym DW411UA) were dispersed in 1 wt %/vol
sodium cholate and sorted by density gradient ultracentrifugation,
as reported by Hersam et al.[16] DWCNT thin
films (50 mm diameter) were fabricated using a vacuum filtration method[20,21] where solutions containing 0.4 μg of DWCNTs were filtered
over 50 nm pore size nitrocellulose membranes. The formed DWCNT thin
films were transferred to silicon wafers with 300 nm thermal oxide
coating (Silicon Quest International) through application of heat
and pressure. Nitrocellulose membranes were dissolved using an acetone
vapor bath, and the DWCNT film was rinsed copiously with isopropyl
alcohol, ethanol, and water, followed by an annealing step at 200
°C in vacuum.
Fabrication of Microfluidic Channel-Integrated
On-Chip Devices
On-chip devices were fabricated using a procedure
described in
our previous work.[20] Briefly, DWCNT TFTs
were prepared from thin films transferred on the silicon wafers. To
reduce hysteresis associated with the charge transfer from the oxide
layer, a monolayer of hexamethyldisilazane was spin-coated on the
substrate prior to the transfer. Channel lengths of 15 or 20 μm
were defined using photolithography, with Cr/Au electrodes (10 and
75 nm thickness, respectively) deposited using electron beam deposition.
Devices were characterized for conductance and transport properties
using a Keithley 4200 Semiconductor Characterization System followed
by an electrical breakdown step to remove metallic DWCNTs. Furthermore,
polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic channels (300 × 300 μm2 cross-section) were attached to the chip for solution introduction.
Electrochemically Accelerated Functionalization with Diazonium
Salts
DWCNT TFTs were reacted with 3-fluoro-4-carboxylbenzenediazonium
tetrafluoroborate electrochemically. The reagent was synthesized from
4-amino-2-fluorobenzoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥97%), fluoroboric
acid, and sodium nitrite using a previously described method.[22] The diazonium structure was confirmed by 1H NMR (Bruker DRX-400) and FTIR (Thermo Nicolet NEXUS 670
with ATR attachment) spectroscopies. For NMR analysis, samples were
dissolved in acetonitrile-d3 (99.8%, Cambridge
Isotope Laboratories, Inc.). Covalent functionalization was achieved
by flowing a 1 mM aqueous solution of 3-fluoro-4-carboxylbenzenediazonium
tetrafluoroborate at a rate of 25 μL/min through microfluidic
channels attached to the TFTs for 1 h. A source–drain voltage
(VSD) of 1 V was applied to the transistor
region to electrochemically accelerate the reaction. The residual
byproducts and reactants were then removed by flowing Nanopure water
through the microfluidic channels for 30 min at the same flow rate.
Raman spectroscopy (Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRAM Raman microscope, model
ARAMIS) with an excitation line of 632.8 nm and FTIR were used to
characterize the extent of covalent functionalization.
Oligonucleotide
Attachment
To efficiently link amino-modified
oligonucleotides to Tube∧2 thin films with carboxylic
acid terminal groups, 1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide
(EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were used to
activate the carboxylic acid to the more reactive NHS ester terminal
group. The activation experiment was performed by flowing a mixture
of 20 mM EDC and 20 mM NHS at pH 5.8 at a rate of 25 μL/min
through microfluidic channels attached to the TFTs for 1 h to create
the NHS ester moiety. A concentration of 1 μM amino-terminated
single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was
then pumped through the microfluidic channels for 5 h to covalently
couple the DNA to Tube∧2. Unreacted ssDNA and chemicals
were removed by Nanopure water pumped through the microfluidic channels
for 30 min.
On-Chip Detection of Complementary Oligonucleotides
Complementary oligonucleotide detections were performed by microfluidic
flow of complementary DNA (cDNA) through Tube∧2
channels. Selectivity experiments were performed by flowing the noncomplementary
DNA (ncDNA) sequence through TFT channel regions using the same flow
rate, time, and rinsing process.
IS6110 Biomarker
Luria–Bertani (LB) plates containing
standard plasmid and the IS6110 123-base fragment were obtained from
the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital,
Taiwan 106. The white colonies were selected and grown in LB broth
containing 50 μg/mL ampicilin in a shaker at 37 °C at 225
rpm overnight. DNA was isolated from the culture using AxyPrep Maxi
Plasmid Kits and amplified using HotStar Taq DNA Polymerase to confirm
the presence of the 123-base fragment. A 10 μL portion of DNA
template was used in a 50 μL reaction mixture containing 0.6
μL of 25 μM primer, 4 μL of 2.5 mM dNTP, 5 μL
of 5× Q solution, 5 μL of 10× buffer, 0.25 μL
of 5U μL-1 HotStar Taq, and 24.55 μL of RNase-free H2O. For PCR, the DNA was denatured at 94 °C for 15 min,
followed by 35 cycles of PCR amplification when the denatured strands
were annealed at 94 °C, 68 °C, and then 72 °C for 1
min each, followed by 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products
were analyzed by gel electrophoresis in 2 wt % agarose in tris-borate-EDTA
buffer, mixed with fluorophore Novel Juice for visualization, and
bands were visualized on a UV-light transilluminator.The ssDNA
probe for IS6110 (/5AmMC6/GC GAG CGT AGG CGT C) was covalently coupled
to the carboxylic-acid-modified Tube∧2 devices using
the same procedure described in the oligonucleotide attachment part
of this section. IS6110 was heated to 95 °C for 10 min to dehybridize
the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). The solution was quickly transported
to a microfluidic injection system and flowed through the Tube∧2 channel at a flow rate of 25 μL/min. Nanopure
water was then flowed through the channel to rinse off nonspecifically
bound species.
Two-Terminal Field Effect Point Sensors
The Tube∧2 point sensors were fabricated by a
dice-and-dip procedure.
We first coated both sides of an undoped Si wafers of 20 μm
thickness (Virginia Semiconductor) with Cr (10 nm) for adhesion and
then gold (150 nm). Afterward, the metal–silicon–metal
wafer was diced into rectangular pieces (∼3.5 × 0.5 mm2). The freshly cleaved end was dipped into a 1% sodium cholate
stabilized aqueous solution of DWCNTs (20 mg/L) to allow a network
of Tube∧2 precursors assembled across the two gold
terminals. The residual surfactant was removed by Joule heating under
a source–drain voltage of 5–10 V and then immersed in
ethanol for 10 s; this process was repeated two additional times to
remove residual surfactants or contaminants. The DWCNTs were converted
to Tube∧2 by immersing the device in the diazonium
and then DNA solutions.
Electrical Characterization
Electrical
characterization
was performed on a Keithley 4200-SCS semiconductor parameter analyzer.
For back-gated devices and gated measurements, transfer characteristic
curves were taken after every covalent modification step to demonstrate
chemical gating effects. All current versus concentration measurements,
both on-chip and point sensors, were nongated with Vg = 0 V and a fixed VSD.
Results and Discussion
Tube∧2 was synthetically
created from DWCNT by
outer-tube-selective functionalization with 2-fluorobenzoic acid groups
using an electrochemically accelerated diazonium reaction.[23,24] Diazonium chemistry was chosen due to its outer-wall-selectivity
and the tunable functionalization of aryl substituents, as demonstrated
by us[20−22] and Martel et al.[25] Benzoic
acid terminal groups provide concomitant versatility as a linker[26] and an abundance of negative charge at neutral
pH (the pKa of benzoic acid is ∼4),
which is useful for chemical gating. We found that the presence of
fluorine at positions ortho relative to the carboxylic acid group
improved the functional degree by ∼40%. This significant improvement
in functional density is attributed to reduced polymerization of the
functional groups, which is known to inhibit the functionalization
efficiency of diazonium reactants,[27] by
the fluorine in place of an aryl hydrogen. Covalent attachment was
verified through Raman spectroscopy (Figure a) showing the growth of the D phonon around
1300 cm–1. The covalent functional degree of the
Tube∧2 channel was assessed using the peak area
ratio of the D and G bands, which quantifies the relative ratio between
sp3 and sp2carbon sites, respectively. By modulating
the reaction time and aryldiazonium salt concentration, various functional
degrees can be achieved. Transmission peaks indicative of the covalent
attachment of 2-fluorobenzoic acid were observed in the IR spectra,
which include the broad carboxylic acid feature of the functional
group and the absence of the diazonium peak that usually appears at
2250 cm–1 (Figure S1).
Figure 2
Chemical
gating mechanism of Tube∧2 thin film
transistors. (a) Raman scattering of a 2-fluorobenzoic acid functionalized
Tube∧2 thin film (red curve) and its precursor,
DWCNT (black curve). (b) Transfer characteristics of the DWCNT TFT
(black; current divided by a factor of 2), and the Tube∧2 TFT (red). (c) Vth shift as a function
of Raman ID/IG ratio for 35 Tube∧2 TFTs. The data points corresponding
to the black and red curves in parts a and b are highlighted as the
solid black and red dots, respectively.
Chemical
gating mechanism of Tube∧2 thin film
transistors. (a) Raman scattering of a 2-fluorobenzoic acid functionalized
Tube∧2 thin film (red curve) and its precursor,
DWCNT (black curve). (b) Transfer characteristics of the DWCNT TFT
(black; current divided by a factor of 2), and the Tube∧2 TFT (red). (c) Vth shift as a function
of Raman ID/IG ratio for 35 Tube∧2 TFTs. The data points corresponding
to the black and red curves in parts a and b are highlighted as the
solid black and red dots, respectively.After outer-wall-selective covalent functionalization of
DWCNTs
to generate Tube∧2, two approximately independent
and distinct changes in the electrical transport are observed. As
previously reported by us,[22] the first
change is approximately a 50% decrease in conductance associated with
the loss of electrical transport mobility of the outer wall. The second
change results from chemical gating effects associated with the charge
from the attached group[28] and can be measured
as shifts in the transport properties (Figure b). The threshold voltage (Vth) shifts of functionalized DWCNT films show a strong
linear correlation with the Raman ID/IG peak area ratios, after accounting for the
loss of outer-wall-mobility (Figure c). We deduce that the increasing functional density
of the negatively charged benzoic acid groups is generating shifts
in the transport properties indicating that the dominant sensing mechanism
for the Tube∧2 devices is chemically driven electrostatic
gating. This gating effect is a field effect similar to that in a
FET, but it arises from chemical binding events rather than a gating
voltage applied through a physical electrode. The mechanism of electrostatic
gating is further evidenced by the ability of the Tube∧2 devices to have higher sensitivity toward ammonium molecules at
higher pH when the carboxylic acid groups are deprotonated (Figure S2). The ability to chemically modulate
the gating environment of the Tube∧2 transistor
by simple tuning of the functional group and functional density allows
for new opportunities to use chemically attached groups as integral
gate components for the device architecture.Unlike unfunctionalized
and noncovalently modified single-walled
carbon nanotube (SWCNT) transistors, we have observed that our Tube∧2 devices have additional advantages such as minimal
nonspecific binding to the graphitic surface (Figure S3). This improved selectivity can be attributed to
the higher packing of functional groups in the outer functional shell
that creates sufficient steric and electrostatic repulsion to inhibit
nonspecific binding to the graphitic surface. Ruling out nonspecific
binding of target and interferant compounds, we can deduce that the
chemical gating of Tube∧2 TFTs are predominantly
a result of specifically bound functional groups.To demonstrate
the extensiveness of chemical gating in Tube∧2 and
its applicability toward sensing, a terminal
23-base amino-modified single-stranded oligonucleotide (ssDNA) (5′-/AmMC6/ATG
GTG GAT AGG CGA CTC ACG TT/-3′) was linked to the Tube∧2 benzoic acid moieties for DNA detection (Figure a). DNA possesses
a doubly negative charged phosphate group per base. With increasing
oligonucleotide base length, larger electrostatic gating effects can
be applied to the inner tube transducer. Upon attachment of the ssDNA,
the Vth shifts by an additional factor
of 2 compared with the fluorobenzoic acid groups and effectively turns
the transistor “ON” without the use of a physical gate
(Figure b). Accordingly,
when measured without a gate (Vg = 0 V)
at VSD = −1 V, the conductance
increases over 10 times (Figure c). These observations unambiguously demonstrate that
chemical gating can be used as a technique to switch Tube∧2 thin film devices from the OFF-state to the ON-state and can provide
the same amplification effect as that achieved through gating with
a conventional gate electrode.
Figure 3
Gate electrode-free ssDNA TFT sensors
show concomitant high selectivity
and sensitivity. (a) Scheme for the preparation of a 23-base ssDNA
tailored Tube∧2 sensor. (b) Transport characteristics
of pristine DWCNT TFT (black; current divided by a factor of 2), 2-fluorobenzoic-acid-modified
Tube∧2 TFT (blue), and ssDNA-modified Tube∧2 TFT (red). (c) Current values of the device at Vg = 0 V, VSD = −1 V,
at each modification step. (d) Threshold voltage shifts as a function
of cDNA concentration for nine Tube∧2 devices with
varying mobility. (e) Comparison of ssDNA-modified Tube∧2 response when exposed to cDNA and mismatched sequences. Note that
data in parts c and e were obtained through single point measurements
(not ISD–Vg sweep), only at Vg = 0 V (without
applying a gate voltage) and VSD = −1
V.
Gate electrode-free ssDNA TFT sensors
show concomitant high selectivity
and sensitivity. (a) Scheme for the preparation of a 23-base ssDNA
tailored Tube∧2 sensor. (b) Transport characteristics
of pristine DWCNT TFT (black; current divided by a factor of 2), 2-fluorobenzoic-acid-modified
Tube∧2 TFT (blue), and ssDNA-modified Tube∧2 TFT (red). (c) Current values of the device at Vg = 0 V, VSD = −1 V,
at each modification step. (d) Threshold voltage shifts as a function
of cDNA concentration for nine Tube∧2 devices with
varying mobility. (e) Comparison of ssDNA-modified Tube∧2 response when exposed to cDNA and mismatched sequences. Note that
data in parts c and e were obtained through single point measurements
(not ISD–Vg sweep), only at Vg = 0 V (without
applying a gate voltage) and VSD = −1
V.We further show that the ssDNA
tagged Tube∧2
TFT under non-gated conditions can perform as well as electrode-gated
TFTs. Varying amounts of the 23-base cDNA (sequence: 5′-/AAC
GTG AGT CGC CTA TCC ACC AT/-3′) were added to test the sensor
sensitivity (Figure d). All oligonucleotide solutions used for detection were prepared
in 10 mM PBS. The cDNA concentration could be approximately quantified
by Vth shifts in the electrical transport
after the addition of cDNA. Nine devices with different mobilities
(0.5–5.0 cm2/(V s)), but similar functional degrees,
were tested and show a strong correlation between cDNA concentration
and Vth shift down to below 5 nM, which
is comparable with three-terminal electrochemical[29] and FET sensors.[30] Upon hybridization,
higher concentrations of cDNA generated larger chemical gating shifts
resulting in significant modulation in the semiconductor conductance.
This large chemical gating effect enables the cDNA to be electrically
detected without the use of an external gate. The selectivity of ssDNA-modified
Tube∧2 TFTs were evaluated by differences in conductance
when exposed to a noncomplementary DNA sequence (ncDNA) versus the
cDNA sequence. Addition of ncDNA sequences with single (5′-AAC
GTG AGT CGC CTA TCC ACT AT-3′), double (5′-AAC
GTT AGT CGC CTA TCC ACT AT-3′), and
13 mismatched bases (5′-/TAT TAT TAT TAT TAT TTT/-3′) showed
progressively smaller conductance increase than the cDNA (Figure e). Single-mismatch
selectivity, at nanomolar concentrations and throughout the large
concentration range tested, can be achieved without the use of an
external gate and any amplification techniques. These experiments
clearly show that chemically gated Tube∧2 TFTs possess
simultaneous high sensitivity and selectivity similar to their electrode-gated
counterparts, which have further shown that when combined with amplification
techniques, femtomolar detection of oligonucleotides can be achieved.[31,32]For futher verification that electrostatic/chemical gating
is the
dominant sensing mechanism, oligonucleotide length dependence studies
were performed. In support of this hypothesis, longer ssDNA sequences,
which have more negative charge, generate larger chemical gating effects
and signal response upon hybridization due to a larger amount of bound
charge. By increasing the ssDNA probe and cDNA target from 10 to 23
bases, the projected detection limit improved by approximately 40%,
and the concentration dependence on Vth shift (the slope) decreased by a factor of about 2.5 (Figure S4). Furthermore, Tube∧2 TFTs can be reused multiple times by heating at 95 °C to dehybridize
bound oligonucleotides from their probe sequences followed by displacement
of free oligonucleotides by copious rinsing. The devices also show
excellent long-term stability of their electrical properties up to
9 months stored in a desiccator.To test the feasibility of
the chemically gated Tube∧2 TFT platform for detecting
realistic targets, we demonstrate the
detection of the 123-base Mycobacterium tuberculosis biomarker (IS6110). Although tuberculosis is treatable, its extremely
high transmission rate and few symptoms cause it to result in approximately
1.5 million deaths annually worldwide. Current diagnostic methods
are either low in sensitivity (only 34–80%, sputum smear microscopy),
time-consuming (requires 9–16 days for culture of bacilli),
or too sophisticated (molecular species diagnostics) to be adopted
for developing countries. Furthermore, a majority of newly infected
cases are in the developing countries, meaning a rapid, simple, low
cost, and highly accurate on-site detection platform for early diagnosis
can have a great positive impact on public health. To detect IS6110,
a 15-base amino-modified ssDNA probe (/5AmMC6/GC GAG CGT AGG CGT C)
that is complementary at the 3′ end of one of the IS6110 DNA
strands was linked to the functionalized Tube∧2
devices. The IS6110 double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) was dehybridized by
melting and immediately dispensed through the ssDNA-modified TFTs
using microfluid channels. Upon addition of the IS6110 marker, similar
to the binding of the model 23-base cDNA, chemical gating shifts in
transport properties that resulted in an increase in conductance were
observed (Figure S5). This is consistent
with specific IS6110 attachment to the probe-modified Tube∧2 TFT.Without the need for a third electrode and a dielectric,
a Tube∧2 field effect sensor can be fabricated as
a free-standing
point probe with only source/drain electrodes (Figure a). To demonstrate the functionality gained
through eliminating a physical gate electrode, a two-terminal field
effect point sensor was created using a photolithography-free, high
throughput dice-and-dip procedure (Figure S6). Electrodes are easily fabricated by double-sided deposition of
gold on an undoped silicon wafer, and individual devices are mass
produced by dicing the metal–silicon–metal wafer into
millimeter scale pieces (Figure b). The channel length (20 μm) of the device
is defined directly by the cross-sectional thickness of the Si wafer.
Tube∧2 sensing devices are created in parallel by
self-assembling DWCNT networks across the cross-section of the wafers
followed by diazonium functionalization and oligonucleotide coupling.
The overall conductivity between point sensors varied more than that
of the traditionally fabricated TFTs, which may arise due to varying
Tube∧2 densities and network morphologies from the
dice-and-dip procedure; however, for a set of 24 point sensors, all
readily achieved submicromolar sensitivity for IS6110 and selectivity
over other mismatched oligonucleotide sequences, closely matching
the performance of microfabricated on-chip devices (Figure c,d and Figure S7).
Figure 4
Tube∧2 field effect point sensor for
tuberculosis
biomarker detection. (a) Schematic of a Tube∧2 field
effect point sensor immersed in a drop of biofluid containing IS6110.
(b) Photograph of Tube∧2 field effect point sensors
fabricated from a metal–silicon–metal wafer (inset)
by a simple dice-and-dip procedure. Note that the paratrechina flavipes
ant that is exploring has a size similar to the sensors (3.5 mm ×
0.5 mm × 20 μm). (c) I–V curves of a representative Tube∧2 field
effect point sensor in response to IS6110. Inset shows the sequences
of the probe DNA and IS6110. (d) Current change of a representative
Tube∧2 field effect point sensor when exposed to
various concentrations of IS6110 (red, target) and 5′-(TAT)5-3′ (dark blue, 11 out of 15 mismatches). The sensors
are operated at a source–drain voltage of 0.1 V, without a
physical gate. The black dotted line indicates the current level equivalent
to 3 times the noise, which is defined as the current fluctuation
in 10 mM PBS control solution without any DNA.
Tube∧2 field effect point sensor for
tuberculosis
biomarker detection. (a) Schematic of a Tube∧2 field
effect point sensor immersed in a drop of biofluid containing IS6110.
(b) Photograph of Tube∧2 field effect point sensors
fabricated from a metal–silicon–metal wafer (inset)
by a simple dice-and-dip procedure. Note that the paratrechina flavipes
ant that is exploring has a size similar to the sensors (3.5 mm ×
0.5 mm × 20 μm). (c) I–V curves of a representative Tube∧2 field
effect point sensor in response to IS6110. Inset shows the sequences
of the probe DNA and IS6110. (d) Current change of a representative
Tube∧2 field effect point sensor when exposed to
various concentrations of IS6110 (red, target) and 5′-(TAT)5-3′ (dark blue, 11 out of 15 mismatches). The sensors
are operated at a source–drain voltage of 0.1 V, without a
physical gate. The black dotted line indicates the current level equivalent
to 3 times the noise, which is defined as the current fluctuation
in 10 mM PBS control solution without any DNA.
Conclusions
We demonstrated that Tube∧2 semiconductors can
be gated solely by chemically attached groups enabling gate electrode-free
thin film transistor sensors. Two-terminal thin film transistor sensors
were shown to reach nanomolar detection limits toward the detection
of a 23-base cDNA sequence, while simultaneously achieving single
base mismatch selectivity. Our chemically gated TFT sensors have also
demonstrated the ability to detect IS6110, a known DNA biomarker of
tuberculosis. The ability to fabricate a high performance field effect
sensor without a gate electrode enabled the creation of a photolithography-free,
high throughput Tube∧2 point sensor with FET sensitivity
and selectivity, but using a two-terminal configuration that is as
simple as a chemiresistor[10,12−15] and significantly simplified compared to the conventional three-terminal
FET sensors. This two-terminal FET sensor architecture is readily
compatible with other versatile fabrication techniques such as paper
electronics[33] and lab-on-a-chip devices[34] to maximize the portable, real-time, and label-free
advantages of electrical sensing. Prototypical devices have shown
detection limits of oligonucleotides and tuberculosis biomarkers comparable
to state-of-the-art three-terminal counterparts that are physically
gated.[31,35] This new concept thus may open up new opportunities
for materials chemistry and device innovation.
Authors: Jia Huang; Allen L Ng; Yanmei Piao; Chien-Fu Chen; Alexander A Green; Chuan-Fu Sun; Mark C Hersam; Cheng S Lee; YuHuang Wang Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yongki Choi; Issa S Moody; Patrick C Sims; Steven R Hunt; Brad L Corso; Israel Perez; Gregory A Weiss; Philip G Collins Journal: Science Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Tassaneewan Laksanasopin; Tiffany W Guo; Samiksha Nayak; Archana A Sridhara; Shi Xie; Owolabi O Olowookere; Paolo Cadinu; Fanxing Meng; Natalie H Chee; Jiyoon Kim; Curtis D Chin; Elisaphane Munyazesa; Placidie Mugwaneza; Alex J Rai; Veronicah Mugisha; Arnold R Castro; David Steinmiller; Vincent Linder; Jessica E Justman; Sabin Nsanzimana; Samuel K Sia Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Iddo Heller; Anne M Janssens; Jaan Männik; Ethan D Minot; Serge G Lemay; Cees Dekker Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2007-12-28 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Zhiwei Peng; Allen L Ng; Hyejin Kwon; Peng Wang; Chien-Fu Chen; Cheng S Lee; YuHuang Wang Journal: Carbon N Y Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 9.594