Literature DB >> 28168396

Effects of visual feedback and memory on unintentional drifts in performance during finger-pressing tasks.

Stanislaw Solnik1,2,3, Mu Qiao1,4, Mark L Latash5.   

Abstract

This study tested two hypotheses on the nature of unintentional force drifts elicited by removing visual feedback during accurate force production tasks. The role of working memory (memory hypothesis) was explored in tasks with continuous force production, intermittent force production, and rest intervals over the same time interval. The assumption of unintentional drifts in referent coordinate for the fingertips was tested using manipulations of visual feedback: young healthy subjects performed accurate steady-state force production tasks by pressing with the two index fingers on individual force sensors with visual feedback on the total force, sharing ratio, both, or none. Predictions based on the memory hypothesis have been falsified. In particular, we observed consistent force drifts to lower force values during continuous force production trials only. No force drift or drifts to higher forces were observed during intermittent force production trials and following rest intervals. The hypotheses based on the idea of drifts in referent finger coordinates have been confirmed. In particular, we observed superposition of two drift processes: a drift of total force to lower magnitudes and a drift of the sharing ratio to 50:50. When visual feedback on total force only was provided, the two-finger forces showed drifts in opposite directions. We interpret the findings as evidence for the control of motor actions with changes in referent coordinates for participating effectors. Unintentional drifts in performance are viewed as natural relaxation processes in the involved systems; their typical time reflects stability in the direction of the drift. The magnitude of the drift was higher in the right (dominant) hand, which is consistent with the dynamic dominance hypothesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finger; Force; Optimization; Unintentional movement; Visual feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28168396      PMCID: PMC5350033          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4878-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task.

Authors:  J P Scholz; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Foot and ankle sensory neuropathy, proprioception, and postural stability.

Authors:  R W van Deursen; G G Simoneau
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks.

Authors:  M L Latash; J F Scholz; F Danion; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Optimization-based models of muscle coordination.

Authors:  Boris I Prilutsky; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Intermittency in the control of continuous force production.

Authors:  A B Slifkin; D E Vaillancourt; K M Newell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Daniel M Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neural basis for the processes that underlie visually guided and internally guided force control in humans.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Keith R Thulborn; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Virtual trajectories, joint stiffness, and changes in the limb natural frequency during single-joint oscillatory movements.

Authors:  M L Latash
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Visual control of isometric force in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  D E Vaillancourt; A B Slifkin; K M Newell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  10 in total

1.  Perturbation-induced fast drifts in finger enslaving.

Authors:  Joseph Ricotta; Cristian Cuadra; Jacob S Evans; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stability of hand force production. II. Ascending and descending synergies.

Authors:  Sasha Reschechtko; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  On the origin of finger enslaving: control with referent coordinates and effects of visual feedback.

Authors:  Valters Abolins; Alex Stremoukhov; Caroline Walter; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Force illusions and drifts observed during muscle vibration.

Authors:  Sasha Reschechtko; Cristian Cuadra; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Stability of hand force production. I. Hand level control variables and multifinger synergies.

Authors:  Sasha Reschechtko; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Unintentional drifts during quiet stance and voluntary body sway.

Authors:  Omid Rasouli; Stanisław Solnik; Mariusz P Furmanek; Daniele Piscitelli; Ali Falaki; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Performance drifts in two-finger cyclical force production tasks performed by one and two actors.

Authors:  Fariba Hasanbarani; Sasha Reschechtko; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Finger pressing task data collected with and without post-trial performance feedback.

Authors:  S Balamurugan; S K M Varadhan
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2020-01-11

9.  Production and Perception of Intentional and Unintentional Actions.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 10.  Efference copy in kinesthetic perception: a copy of what is it?

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.